Wednesday, February 28, 2007

So-called Conservatives

What's conservative about them? Recent statements by Conservative Party leaders in Britain give us pause. WSJ:
Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague's Jan. 31 speech to the Royal Institute of International Affairs -- Chatham House -- spoke of a "solid but not slavish" alliance, and called for "the effective management of the relationship with the United States of America." These controversial words caused significant political damage here. It echoed Mr. Cameron's "liberal conservative" speech given on the fifth anniversary of 9/11, where he spoke of the need for "humility and patience" in conducting foreign policy.

Mr. Hague's carefully chosen description of America's and Britain's "loss of moral authority," and the need for Britain to shift more political weight to "the relationships of the Asia-Pacific region," is viewed in Washington as a fundamental reassessment of the special relationship, with far-reaching implications for both the U.S. and the U.K.

What was missing from the speech was any display of solidarity with the U.S. when thousands of British soldiers are fighting alongside their American counterparts in Iraq and Afghanistan, a stunning omission at a time of war.
Kneejerk opposition to Tony Blair and America on the war will damage our historic close relationship in the view of many Americans.

Are they seeking to join their neighbors across the Channel in Euro-hell?

Perhaps Conservative Party leaders should consider a world without America.

Obama the Dream

Despite early indications that black support was iffy for Obama, the numbers are climbing for him. Will it be enough? WaPo, via RCP. Most of the self-anointed (and aging) black liberal leadership are in the Clintons' corner. There's been some backlash at home in Chicago, and black attendance was light in Springfield. We'll have to see how it plays out, but I don't imagine Hillary and Bill will just sit by. Maybe they will trot out Al Sharpton to run again---he likes the expense-account trappings of a Presidential campaign.

Up until now Obama's base has been among the MSM and the liberal white elite---you know, journalists and English teachers still working on the meaning of their great American novel, stymied because they don't really believe in the American Dream. Obama is their Dream Candidate.

We'll see how he holds up over the next year. But even if he wins the Dem nomination, short of Dennis Kucinich Obama is the most liberal candidate running, which will not serve him well in the general election. Dream on.

Previous posts: Political Bedfellows, What Then, Barack?

UPDATE: James Taranto, Best of the Web:
In 1993 the Washington Post infamously referred to evangelical Christians as "poor, uneducated and easy to command." The amount of attention the press pays to buffoonish "leaders" like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson suggests this stereotype is widespread. Journalists are unlikely to describe black Americans as "poor, uneducated and easy to command." But the deference that they gives to buffoonish "leaders" like Jackson and Sharpton leads us to suspect that they may harbor such stereotypes.

If Giuliani and Obama win their parties' nominations, it would represent a diminution of the power, respectively, of evangelical and black "leaders." It would show that evangelical and black voters are more sophisticated than the press has heretofore recognized, and thereby strike a blow against prejudice.

UPDATE: At the RCP Blog, Obama on the war in 2002, the Jeff Berkowitz interview---"Give Inspections A Chance". Ah yes, a whole host of critical issues to consider. (After all, he did "major in international relations", which he cited as his foreign policy experience.) But never to act on. What then Barack?

If, God help us he ever got elected, I fully expect a Carteresque "Crisis of Confidence" speech at a critical moment, blaming someone else for his indecision and and incompetence. I'd trust Hillary over Obama on foreign policy. Shudder.

Legislative Overkill

Another study on the HPV virus. Tribune headline "27% of women have HPV":
Women ages 20 to 24 had the highest overall HPV prevalence in the study, 44.8 percent. Prevalence increased each year from ages 14 to 24, then dropped off gradually, confirming that young, sexually active women face the greatest risk.
The vaccine, which some want to have mandated for schoolgirls as young as eleven, would only cover 4 strains of the virus which affect 3.4% of women.

If parents think their kids might have sex at the age of 11 and wish their children to have this vaccine, fine. At age 18, girls can make their own decisions. The schools should stay out of it.

It is presumably not a communicable disease on school premises.

We just had some legislative worthy propose a law to mandate hand washing, which has passed the Illinois House. This is silly micromanaging, though obviously well-intentioned---it's common sense. But this kind of intervention can be very invasive and damaging to privacy rights, as well as undermining parental authority and values, which a healthy society should be in favor of supporting.

What will they want to mandate next in the schools? PC psychological profiles?

Illinois legislators should stick to the basics---fix our failing schools, balance our bankrupt state budget.

Previous post: Invasion of Privacy

Rezko Cools His Heels

Tony Rezko will cool his heels at home until next spring. Trial date Feb. 25th, 2008. (When's the Illinois presidential primary going to be?) Tribune:
Antoin "Tony" Rezko, once a top adviser and fundraiser to Gov. Rod Blagojevich, won't have to go on trial on kickback charges for a full year.

U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve set trial for February 2008 after Rezko's lawyer complained about the complexity of the case. The lawyer, Joseph Duffy, also expects to be involved in a major trial in Ohio next fall. [snip]

On Tuesday Duffy sought to ease bond restrictions for Rezko, but St. Eve ordered that he remain on home confinement.

Prosecutors opposed lifting home confinement, arguing that Rezko had misrepresented his finances three times to the judge.

According to Niewoehner, Rezko had falsely claimed to pay off the mortgage on his Wilmette house, only to have the check bounce; tried to post the house for bail even though he had signed away his interest in the property; and failed to disclose $330,000 in personal property.
Tony Rezko, hanging around the neighborhood.

Related post: Political Bedfellows

Letter on Gross Receipts Tax

(Guest post: Letter from my friend Tom Sparks, posted with his blessing. Reference is made in the letter to a study of school spending needs by a group of experts, which Mr. Sparks questions, outlined in this series in the Tribune.)

Friends,
I am writing you all just to keep you apprised of the latest initiative from our Governor and many of the State's pols: namely the Gross Receipts Tax.

The gist is that many activists and special interests have sought more tax money for schools for years, but they could never get a higher sales tax or tax swap done politically. The idea now being floated is basically a VAT tax of 1%. Every transaction will be taxed at 1%. The guy who grows hardwood will pay 1% when he sells to the lumber yard; the lumber yard will pay 1% when it sells boards to a cabinet maker; the cabinet maker will pay 1% when he sells his cabinets to the wholesaler; the wholesaler 1% when she sells to the retailer; the retailer 1% when he sells to the remodeler; the remodeler 1% of her net business on the project. You can see how this is both hidden (and thus easy to raise over time) and will serve to drive prices of everything higher. This is projected to raise $13B; They propose scaling back the sales tax, but still plan on net additional taxes of about $4B, with $3B for most school districts. The "correct" funding # was calculated by some group of "experts"; interestingly, almost no district in the State spends this number, including Glencoe, so I can't see how they got this #.....

I would note that ILL currently spends $20B on schools, so this is a 15% increase. It assumes that spending money is the answer to all ills. It assumes that the State of ILL is a lean mean spending machine, ie, there's no fat to cut. In essence, they are asking ILL taxpayers to do with less because they can't do more with the same amount. (As has every business in the country in the last 20 years; you've all experienced the fun of increase productivity/efficiency). It also assumes that other taxes will be repealed and that no extra spending will be crammed onto this change.

FWIW, I oppose this tax increase, and in particular, its form. It's a hidden tax that will be VERY easy to quietly raise over time. You never see it, like you do sales taxes or income taxes. Prices just keep going up and your dollar doesn't go as far, but, folks are more apt to blame the service provider.

If you support higher taxes, I would suggest you write your Rep to tell them to just raise the Sales or income tax. It's cleaner and, more importantly, visible.

My suggestion is that the State reevaluate its spending; ban tax credits and tax deductions that are really off-balance sheet Enronesque spending in the dark. If something is so important that it needs taxpayer funding, then it can and will be funded in the sunshine by a direct appropriation from the treasury, not some hidden credit or deduction. There simply has to be pork that can be taken away from special interests. The State should voucherize its school spending for the bottom 1/3 of districts, and, any money saved by eliminating pork should go to bumping up the value of the vouchers. The beauty of this idea is that school districts that work, like ours, will not be impacted. Those that have issues, which some blame solely on a lack of tax money, will get more tax money. The politicians will have to decide between their buddies and the bottom 1/3 of school districts. Vouchers will allow parents who value education to find each other and free their children from the cycle of poverty that has been so intractable. Currently, the parents that care are sentenced to schools with parents who dump their kids on the school. Vouchers will force the same efficiencies and innovations onto underperforming schools as businesses have been doing for years.

The politicians are asking you to do with less, by taking more of your money; I would put the shoe on the other foot, and ask them and their bloated cronies to do with less, and give it to those who they claim need it.

Whether you agree with me or not, I just wanted to make sure all were informed. I would be happy to discuss this further with anyone interested.

Tom Sparks


Previous education posts: Pushy PTAs?, Core (In)Competencies

Pushy PTAs?

NY Times with an accurate portrayal of PTAs today, at least relatively affluent suburban ones. As a former PTA president I can vouch for it (though I didn't wear business suits to preside, I wore mom sweaters):
“It can be a fine line between parental involvement and overinvolvement,” said Joel R. Reidenberg, a school board member in Millburn, N.J., who called the new breed of parent groups both a “great asset” and a “tough challenge” for a school system. “Right now in the suburban schools, our society is grappling with the right balance,” he said.

While few school officials were willing to speak publicly about their specific conflicts with parent groups for fear of antagonizing them, many said parents routinely go over their heads to the superintendent or school board as matter-of-factly as if they were complaining to a restaurant manager about bad service. Other principals said that some PTA parents request special treatment for their children, like assigning them to a popular teacher or excusing them from gym.
Bad service. What a concept for public schools to grapple with---the idea that we are education consumers. Let's push a little harder.

That said, some PTA parents are like stage moms---their little darlings are prima donnas. That's their payoff for their volunteer work---preferential treatment.

And that's why more suburban parents don't opt out to private schools.

One trend that I hope continues is independent PTOs. The national PTA takes a slice of local chapters' dues and uses it for liberal lobbying. They work hand in glove with the NEA, which has destroyed most urban public schools.

Other education posts: Math: Stuck on Stupid, Mediocrity Rules, Say Yes to Single Sex Education, Core (In)Competencies, Outdated Education

The Jihad Apologist Press

The culture war is getting serious, with Newsweek giving only one religion a pass from its usual god is dead approach. Oh, no. We can't have an uppity formerly Muslim woman step out of her prescribed PC role---she's supposed to beat up on Western Civilization, not embrace it. LGF: "Newsweek Joins Islamists, Attacks Ayaan Hirsi Ali". This corroborated by Anne Applebaum, in her WaPo column on European attitudes to Hirsi Ali.

And the NY Times (via LGF) suggests the movie "Obsession" is propaganda, when most of it is just showing jihad recruitment tapes. So yeah, a lot of it is propaganda. Is that what you mean NY Times? I thought not.

They find critics who think the movie needs more context on the peaceful side of Islam, and so it shouldn't be shown at all. Well, the movie did cite that as a caveat. I know the NY Times was also sympathetic to IRA terrorists, but I don't remember them ever feeling they needed to write long paragraphs about the great contributions of the Catholic church throughout history in any story on the IRA. And if the Catholic church were still indulging in The Inquisition I can't imagine the NY Times giving them any kind of pass.

It's the Jihad Apologist Press gone mainstream.

Related posts: Hirsi Ali Speaks Up, Earned Contempt, The Terrorist Media

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Katie of the Fervent Hopes

Perky Katie, in search of the perfect dress, and the conventional wisdom. Her fervent hopes revealed:
But my fervent hope is that Hollywood’s embrace of Al Gore doesn’t give people an excuse to condemn and mock the effort — and oppose taking steps that we as a society need to take to deal with the issue of climate change. Some people find anything trendy repugnant, but this is a trend that’s really important.
Awk. News as a "really important trend".

Sen. Levin InstaHawk

Is it really Sen. Carl Levin?

A total 180. He wants to go after IRAN AND SYRIA as they are letting insurgents and arms in to kill our troops.

RedState with the story.

And video.

Maybe Dems are looking at a huge shift in poll numbers. Or maybe they're scared they might have to deal with a Middle East that's broken if they don't support the President to the hilt in "HIS war".

Or maybe we finally have a responsible foreign policy Democrat, since they forced out Sen. Joe Lieberman. Maybe he is getting to the right of Hillary in her party to save her from the Left.

UPDATE: Video of Lt. Gen. Odierno on finding Iranian marked weapons caches as a result of the neighborhood policing of the surge. They have also picked up 600 insurgents in 60 days, so they haven't all run off to Iran.

A Sequel We'd Rather Skip

John Fund on the Democrat unease with Hill and Bill:
That's why it's important for Democrats to take Mr. Geffen's unkind comments seriously and have a candid discussion about them now rather than later, when they are wedded to her as a nominee. It's entirely possible that Mrs. Clinton's many strengths outweigh her drawbacks. But ignoring the issues Mr. Geffen raised or dismissing them, as Mrs. Clinton did, as "the politics of personal destruction" only delays the day when they will have to be addressed forthrightly.
" Wedded to her". It's advice kindly meant.

Well, make that unease general. And as for the politics of personal destruction, the Clintons are masters of it, making even their own former aides (not working for them this time) describe the prospect of a new Clinton administration as a sequel they'd rather skip.

America At Work

Recent excerpt from the Gartman Letter out of London, by Dennis Gartman:
AMERICA, THE MIGHTY ECONOMIC MACHINE: We do tend to forget just how massive is the American economic engine. When were hear of a gross domestic product that is heading toward $13 trillion annually, the mind numbs up. This is an impossibly large number to try to comprehend, and so we simply sigh and let the number pass into oblivion. Thus, we came across a wonderful map last week whilst in Canada that compares the GDP's of the various states of the union to nations around the world. For example, it is worthy of note that the "GDP" of Texas is very near to the GDP of Canada; that the "GDP" of Florida is roughly equal to that of S. Korea; that the "GDP" of California is roughly equal to that of France; that Virginia equals Austria; that Ohio equals Australia; that Russia's economy is but 80% of that of Ohio; that Illinois equals Mexico; that N. Carolina equal Sweden... and we could go on.

When presented in this fashion one can get a sense of the sheer majesty of the US economy, lost amidst the data of GDP, and industrial production, and retail sales and the like. But to know that N. Carolina equals Sweden... well that puts it all in perspective. This is one large country, and one enormous global engine for the world... a magnet for immigrants... the great "sucking sound" moving in direct opposition to what Ross Perot warned us about those many years ago.
Capitalist America---making the world economy work.

Muir's New Series

Chris Muir is back from Iraq. Care about his characters. Here and here.

Related UPDATE: Former NY Mayor Koch, RCP "Appeasing Our Enemies Won't Bring Peace". Sen. Joe Lieberman on what is at stake. IBD on the Democrats "Do Over". RedState on the surge. And the Iraqis reach accord on oil revenues.

Related post: Outlaw War Now!

Model Daughter, French Style

Yes, I actually did first read the Wall St. Journal as a teenager when it was the only reading material available in the dentist's waiting room. I soon discovered what I call the wacko column, that offbeat offering in the middle of the front page. Today we find a story on the daughter of French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, who ditched her university studies in banking to become a model.

Marie is now the face of the new Givenchy perfume, "Ange ou Démon". Her dad has dropped out of the French presidential race. You might say his demons were some "youths" on strike last year, and a few other strange chapters in French politics. Appointed to his position, it would have been the first time he had run for office. WSJ:
"There's less pressure on my dad because he's not running in the presidential elections, so I took an agency in Paris," Ms. de Villepin said. Mr. de Villepin did not reply to a request for comment. "I did everything I could to dissuade her," Mr. de Villepin said in October, according to news agencies. "But it seems she's doing it, and that she's talented."
More bon mots from Ms. de Villepin:
"I dumped it all, my past and my studies," she said, "to do something where you don't need a brain."
The only mystery is why her daddy tried to dissuade her---she seems to be much more successful at functioning brainlessly than he's been.

Latest de Villepin utterances at No Paseran. Oh well, he can always go back to his poetry, signing guest books, and his study of Napoleon, etcetera. And his daughter can support him in the style to which he's accustomed.

Iran's Realities

No talks, no "detente" with Iran? Edward N. Luttwak, WSJ on Iran's ethnic realities:
Kurds account for some 7% of the population, and their nationalism is Kurdish and not Persian, having been much strengthened by the successful example of virtual Kurdish independence in Iraq. Their demands for autonomy have become sufficiently forceful to start an insurgency. The same is true of two smaller nationalities that are even more violently disaffected with frequent fire-fights and bombings: the Arabs and the Baluch, which account for another 3% of the population. But the largest of Iran's subject nationalities are the Azeris. While many have been assimilated, at least 20 million still speak an entirely different Turkic language, and increasingly form the core of a united Azeri nation that extends beyond western Iran to include the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan.

The religious extremism of Iran's regime creates its own divisions. The bloody persecution of the Bahais, the new persecution of the Sufis and the institutional subjection of Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians have attracted greater attention, but the ill-treatment of the 9% of the population that is Sunni is more important politically: In Tehran where more than a million Sunnis live, there is no Sunni mosque as there is in Rome, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C.

And the US is squeezing the regime with financial sanctions, which appear to be working. More from Fouad Ajami, via RCP:

Hyperinflation, the drying up of international credit lines, and the astounding growth in energy consumption in Iran are bringing the country to the edge of crisis. The price of bread and meat and basic commodities has risen by as much as 25 percent. To tranquilize the realm, gasoline is subsidized well below its cost, and domestic consumption now accounts for a stunning 40 percent of Iran's oil production. Dire predictions now hold that the country will be unable to export much oil a decade from now.
The West can't go wobbly now. The message to Iran is stop your nuke development. Then we'll talk.


Related posts: Iran Nuke Animation,Women Only Island, Iran on the Brink, Schooling the Gliberals

UPDATE: Mainstream Iranian "political analyst" calls Zionists "genetically bloodthirsty". MEMRI video via RCP Blog.

Chicagoans for Jihad

Update on the alleged local recruits for jihad. Tribune:
Two Chicago-area cousins linked last week to a terrorism conspiracy traveled to Egypt in 2004 and planned to head to Pakistan for military training, federal prosecutors told a judge Monday.

Zubair A. Ahmed, 27, and Khaleel Ahmed, 26, were seeking "training in jihad," prosecutors said during a detention hearing on whether Khaleel Ahmed should be kept in custody as he is transferred to Ohio to face the charges.
Khaleel is on tape requesting sniper training. His defense lawyer:
Khaleel Ahmed's defense attorney, Brian Sieve, argued that his client is not a danger, is employed and has been living with his family.
Ahmed has no criminal history and no drug use in his past, Sieve said.
Well, that's a relief. They also claim they wanted to go to Pakistan for a vacation.


The judge ordered him held.

Previous post: Terror Tactics Hit Home

Political Bedfellows

Governor Blagojevich, the gift of sleaze that just keeps on giving. Uh, no, I guess it's we Illinois taxpayers who keep on giving.

Front page of the Sun Times about two of Blago's employees. The chief of staff of the state Human Services Dept. has been accused of sexual harassment by her "personal assistant". State legislators are now providing "oversight":
Others wondered how a state agency that provides social services to the poor could afford to equip its top two officials with personal assistants like Estes, who court and state records indicate was paid $70,000 a year primarily to chauffeur Wertz.
And here's the story of a he-said, she-said claim and denial of harassment by a couple of the governor's political bedfellows.
Sun Times:
After raising money for Gov. Blagojevich's campaign in 2002, Rajinder Bedi landed a $106,908-a-year job traveling the world for the state's International Trade Office.

A former female co-worker had political ties, too. Her father gave money to the governor and had business ties to Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a former top Blagojevich fund-raiser now under federal indictment.

But a December 2004 holiday party conversation between Bedi and the co-worker went well beyond politics and trade, an internal report says.

One subject? The woman's date. "You tigress you, how did you get him?" she claimed Bedi said after meeting her boyfriend. "He is gorgeous, what a body, what height."

And Rezko sure did get around. Makes you wonder, though, how anything ever gets done under the Blagojevich administration.

The accused was also a Kerry supporter and vice president of the Extra Wide Sock Company.

Blagojevich and his political bedfellows---the tab and the joke are on us.


P.S. Fortunately for Obama, or perhaps unfortunately, Rezko's wife sold her lot next door to his mansion to one of Rezko's lawyers who wants to build condos or something.


Related posts: Cronyism for Goons, It Never Ends, In No Way Related

U. of I. Stiffs Vets

The University of Illinois, after encouraging veterans to apply for scholarships funded under the Illinois Veteran Grant program and admitting Vets to its newly expanded MBA program, has shamefully reneged on the deal. Politicians such as Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn and Congressman Rahm Emanuel touted the program.

John Ruberry, Marathon Pundit and a U of I alum has an exclusive interview with the whistleblower who was appalled by these lies and broken promises and refused to implement them.

You may also recall our Governor awarding jobs to his friends rather than veterans. What does Tammy Duckworth, (new Director of the Illinois Dept. of Veterans Affairs) have to say about this?

Iran Nuke Animation


The latest bizarre animation from Iran. Faceless little nuke workers busy building in the desert.


At least the evil USA character has a face. MEMRI via HotAir.

UPDATE: And US finds a factory and another major weapons cache in Iraq with Iranian components. They are killing our soldiers.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Peaceniks: Arrest Patty Murray

Peacenik loonies on the loose in the state of Washington. Law enforcement has their hands full. Patty's happy to have them on hand. She can barely handle the peaceniks, how would she handle real terrorists? Oh yeah, Osama's just a daycare provider. Video at HotAir.

ACLU Head Charged with Child Porn

ACLU leader in Virginia arrested on child porn charges. Pushing parents aside so they can get at our kids. Ignored by the MSM (except apparently ABC) What a surprise.

What an OUTRAGE!

Liberals push to sexualize our children at younger and younger ages. This guy was a leader in opposing porn filters in libraries. As always, with liberals politics is ME FIRST---

It's personal, and it's your kid at risk. From them.

More at Stop the ACLU.

Related posts: Purposely Provocative, Your Liberty, My Liberty

Jihad's Campus Collaborators

Fordham, MIT, CUNY, Georgetown? Caroline Glick, RCP: "Jihad's Campus Collaborators":

Fordham University is far from alone in providing a platform for Holocaust deniers. Last Thursday the Dean's office at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology co-sponsored an event on the Arab-Israel conflict called, "Foreign Policy and Social Justice: A Jewish View, a Muslim View." The man invited to provide the Jewish view was Dovid Weiss, a member of the crackpot Neturei Karta sect. Weiss rose to prominence when he traveled to Teheran last December to participate in Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Holocaust denial conference. [snip]

At an "Israel Apartheid Week" event at City University of New York, after watching a propaganda film, 19-year old Binyamin Rister rose and politely asked the ISM presenters if they supported terrorism. When he received no reply he politely repeated the question. Rather than wait for an answer, CUNY security guards dragged Rister from the room and then repeatedly banged his head against the wall of an elevator and threw him head first down the stairs. Rister's injuries from the assault by campus security required him to be evacuated by ambulance in a neck brace to the hospital.
Don't forget Penn's president (who did NOT get the nod for Harvard) smiling with the student jihadist in costume. This Wednesday night DePaul University is hosting an event with quite a lopsided panel. I plan to go. We will see what is said. Maybe I should wear my bike helmet.

Burying Girls Alive

In the Islam of today, "women tend to be seen as subjects of the law, rather than its shapers".

A Sunni Islamic scholar, safely ensconced at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, but also a "working alim" who has fatwa authority, has found historic evidence of women as teachers and makers of holy law. It sounds like he is treading lightly, but persistently. NY Times (HT Ann Althouse, via Instapundit):
Akram’s work has led to accusations that he is championing free mixing between men and women, but he says that is not so. He maintains that women students should sit at a discreet distance from their male classmates or co-worshipers, or be separated by a curtain. (The practice has parallels in Orthodox Judaism.) The Muslim women who taught men “are part of our history,” he says. “It doesn’t mean you have to follow them. It’s up to people to decide.”

Neverthless, Akram says he hopes that uncovering past hadith scholars could help reform present-day Islamic culture.
Of course, the latest evidence cited in this story was from the 15th century. Got a little time to make up. More than a few generations of what Akram describes as "decline in every aspect of Islam" to reverse. Apparently women are not even allowed to pray in mosques these days. The alim counsels more real scholarship, less politics and seeks to persuade:
When Akram lectures, he dryly notes, women are more excited by this history than men. To persuade reluctant Muslims to educate their girls, Akram employs a potent debating strategy: he compares the status quo to the age of al jahiliya, the Arabic term for the barbaric state of pre-Islamic Arabia. (Osama Bin Laden and Sayyid Qutb, the godfather of modern Islamic extremism, have employed the comparison to very different effect.) Barring Muslim women from education and religious authority, Akram argues, is akin to the pre-Islamic custom of burying girls alive. “I tell people, ‘God has given girls qualities and potential,’ ” he says. “If they aren’t allowed to develop them, if they aren’t provided with opportunities to study and learn, it’s basically a live burial.”
Burying girls alive?!!!

We are left to wonder the whys of this custom. Apparently it has evolved into today's honor killings, according to this interpretation by an American Muslim woman. (This was written in June 2001, pre-Sept. 11th. She was on the board of CAIR then, obviously treading lightly there as well. She has since started her own group and is apparently carrying CAIR's water on supposed "hate speech". At The Volokh Conspiracy. )

Obviously this discussion is not merely an academic one. And as we have seen recently in Chicago, it is not limited to Islam. But this culture of cruelty toward women emanates most openly and destructively from today's Middle East. And that is where we need to confront it as best we can, and do what we can here in America.

Related posts: Hirsi Ali Speaks Up, The Multiculti Trap, They Call Me Infidel, This is Sharia, An Ancient Culture Extinguished

Sanctimonious Schoenberg

Tribune:
Bolstered by last fall's election successes, the Senate's Democratic majority achieved a long-sought ideological victory Friday by giving overwhelming approval to a measure to encourage stem-cell research in Illinois.

The 35-23 vote, sending the highly symbolic and political measure to the House, reflected in part the gains made in the Nov. 7 election by Democrats who embraced the controversial medical research in winning campaigns for four seats previously held by Republicans who opposed the research. A vote more than two years ago on a similar measure fell two votes shy of approval.
We need to do this. We need to do this today---so says the moral arbiter of the North Shore, and perhaps of all Illinois! Sun Times:

"The reason why we need to do this and do this today is because this research holds great promise for life-saving breakthroughs," said Sen. Jeff Schoenberg (D-Evanston), the bill's lead Senate sponsor.

Researchers believe embryonic stem cells have potential to help in the treatment of diabetes, Lou Gehrig's disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer, stroke, Crohn's disease, Alzheimer's disease, AIDS/HIV and sickle cell anemia, among other things.

But in order to obtain the cells for that research, human embryos are destroyed, which makes the process so controversial among groups that believe life begins at conception.

Potential? Great promise? Name one life saved by embryonic stem cells. Instead, life is being deliberately destroyed for political posturing.

I haven't read in the Illinois press about the recent discovery of the live-saving properties of cells from amniotic fluid. And let me remind Sen. Schoenberg that stem cells from adults and umbilical cord blood are already yielding tangible benefits.

This is a despicable action. One would expect better from a politician who reminds us of the evils of the Holocaust, which also destroyed life for medical experimentation, supposedly to improve the human race. A new Holocaust museum is being built in Skokie to commemorate those who died. This is a new chapter.

And all in aid of placating the feminazis, those who kill their own, putting a bland face on their assault on life---it's for the greater good, after all.

Finally, this reality, visible to all. More than half don't make it at this age, but shouldn't we give them a chance? 21 weeks, viable before the end of the 2nd trimester. Baby Amillia.


Related posts:
Do no harm, Stem Cells and Babies, Just another lifestyle choice

UPDATE: More on the liberal avalanche in the Illinois legislature at Illinois Review.

Turn the Question Around

Death penalty debate in Maryland, with a new Democrat governor. Gregory Kane, Baltimore Sun:

In your address to the legislative committees, governor, you posed a question yourself: Would we want to risk a member of our family being wrongly executed? Let's turn that question around and apply it to a Maryland with no death penalty.

Let's say there's an inmate serving life without parole. He has it in for a corrections officer, one like McGuinn, whose only fault was doing his job the right way. This inmate knows three things:

• He's got life with no parole.

• Maryland has no death penalty.

• He can kill the corrections officer and not get punished for it because he knows he has already received the maximum penalty Maryland allows.

Now, governor, would you want one of your relatives working as a corrections officer under those conditions?

I have gone back and forth on the death penalty. Because I am pro-life it would seem consistent to be anti-death penalty. But this is very persuasive. Kind of like how do you deter people who are willing to blow themselves up.

Outlaw War Now!

Michael Fumento, Weekly Standard, RCP, exposes the Democrats' ignorance and grandstanding on defense. Read his essay on our military and its special units. The defense budget is the only one Democrats ever want to cut. President Clinton cut the defense budget to the bone and ran our troops ragged in police actions around the world, while depleting our cruise missile stocks with sporadic and useless hits on a few empty buildings.

We need to replace equipment and increase the size of our forces at least back to where we were before the end of the Cold War.

President Bush has acknowledged some of these problems with a proposed fiscal year 2008 defense budget increase of 11.3 percent or $481.4 billion. Yet an October Congressional Budget Office report indicates that may be far too small, that DoD will require an annual average of about $560 billion through 2024 to pay for ordered weapons and rising operational and personnel costs. So far the Democrats, while promising to do so, have not yet directly challenged defense spending. Let's hope they don't try to use their special ops doubling fantasy as leverage. If they really want to demonstrate how they've become advocates of national defense, they should earmark that extra $80 billion that the CBO report says is required.

Sheer numbers of troops and sophisticated and well-maintained equipment are no substitute for the skills and courage of Special Operations Forces. But neither can SOF substitute for a large army of well-trained and disciplined troops or for top-quality, operative hardware. We obtained our "peace dividend" by gutting the military.
Democrats may say they want to defeat terrorists (apparently it was in their written plan for their first 100 hours, I haven't actually heard much actual talk from them about defeating terrorists.)---but saying doesn't make it so. The "Outlaw War Now" Democrats are about as effective in the execution of our foreign policy as they are with their "Ban Bad Guys" prescription for Homeland Security.

Related posts: Terror Tactics Hit Home, Death And Politics, Obscene Amenities, Dead Souls Democrats

UPDATE: As noted in the comments, Michael Fumento's home site has this referenced article with links and pix.

Greenies, Stay Home

Some pointed and amusing commentary by Caroline Overington from Australia on itinerant greenies.

Patrick J. Michaels, NRO on Al Gore's science fiction:
According to satellite data published in Science in November 2005, Greenland was losing about 25 cubic miles of ice per year. Dividing that by 630,000 yields the annual percentage of ice loss, which, when multiplied by 100, shows that Greenland was shedding ice at 0.4 percent per century.

“Was” is the operative word. In early February, Science published another paper showing that the recent acceleration of Greenland’s ice loss from its huge glaciers has suddenly reversed.
(Not Melting here.) And even if we implemented Kyoto to solve this underwhelming "problem", what would be the effect?
The Kyoto Protocol, if fulfilled by every signatory, would reduce global warming by 0.07 degrees Celsius per half-century. That’s too small to measure, because the earth’s temperature varies by more than that from year to year.
So Al, relax, you've got the Oscar. Bill is probably seething because he has given by far the better performance over the years, but this is your consolation prize from the liberal glitterati. Enjoy. And I think the musicians, or whoever was giving them their cue, had it about right. The Swamp---
DiCaprio asked Gore when they came on stage if he had an announcement to make, which Gore ignored, but when the actor asked again, the former vice president pulled what appeared to be a speech out of his coat pocket.

At this point, the orchestra struck up the music which signals that it's time to get off the stage.

So get off the stage, stay home. Please.


Previous posts: The Stuff of Nightmares, Think Again

UPDATE: OK, so the music was staged too. I only watched the tail end, when thankfully Gore was followed by Clint Eastwood. The Politico has more on Al's political pretensions, uh aspirations. Looks like Obama has some competition running for President of The Planet. And The Academy has officially gone green! Here are their helpful tips. You notice they suggest leaving the car at home, but no mention of abandoning the Lear Jets.

UPDATE: Via Drudge:
The Tennessee Center for Policy Research, an independent, nonprofit and nonpartisan research organization committed to achieving a freer, more prosperous Tennessee through free market policy solutions, issued a press release late Monday:

Last night, Al Gore’s global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, but the Tennessee Center for Policy Research has found that Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy.

Gore’s mansion, [20-room, eight-bathroom] located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).

Friday, February 23, 2007

Bright Colors and Cats

Right now I have spring fever, so I fished out a pix from an Argentine spring. This is for those who like cats, and those who like a little bright color. (Just down the hill from where Evita is buried, by the way.) Have a good weekend!

What Then, Barack?

British historian and Harvard professor Niall Ferguson, and hardly a hawk, on "Obama's muddled view of intervention"---asking the questions that so far no MSM journalist has raised.
Tribune:
Take a look at Obama's arguments for a speedy U.S. withdrawal. Last month, he asserted that "redeployment remains our best leverage to pressure the Iraqi government to achieve ... political settlement between its warring factions." The key is "to give Iraqis their country back" because "no amount of American soldiers can solve the political differences at the heart of somebody else's civil war."

But Obama's claim that a U.S. withdrawal would somehow pressure the Sunni and Shiite "to come to the table and find peace" is a fraud. Withdrawal is much more likely to lead to an escalation of the internecine conflict that is tearing Iraq apart. In a devastating 2006 paper for the Brookings Institution, Daniel L. Byman and Kenneth M. Pollackpointed out that "the only thing standing between Iraq and a descent into a Lebanon- or Bosnia-like maelstrom is 135,000 American troops."
Professor Ferguson points us to Obama's foreign policy advisor, Samantha Powers, "
whose Pulitzer Prize-winning "A Problem from Hell" was an indictment of Western impotence in the face of successive genocides" and wonders if Obama has absorbed its message.

If we leave when Barack Obama wants us to, what then?

Previous posts: Flower Power Obama, Scarlett O'Bama

UPDATE: WSJ has a sympathetic piece on Obama's ability in Illinois to work across the aisle and turn former foes into friends. They missed a few of his extremely liberal votes. Also here. As for his former foes, presumably on ethics legislation among other issues, the political spoils system still works for Obama's new supporters, like state Rep. Rickey "Hollywood" Hendon.
Sun Times story today. And Obama manages his business as usual as well. Yup he knows how to work the ropes around corrupt Cook County and Illinois.

UPDATE: Dan at Reverse Spin has some news on Obama's "wimpy logo". (Here's my earlier take on the Big O:) Sounds like yet another waffle.

Perle at DePaul

(Sent to me by PBS, from their press release:)

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle, an advocate of the war against Saddam Hussein and the subject of a new film to air on PBS, The Case for War: In Defense of Freedom, will participate in a discussion on the merits of the war in Iraq at DePaul University on Wednesday, February 28th, 6:30p.m (Merle Reskin Theater 60 E. Balbo Avenue). In addition to a highlight screening of The Case for War: In Defense of Freedom, Gangs of Iraq (Co-Presentation with FRONTLINE) which documents Iraqi security forces and Operation Homecoming: Writing the Wartime Experience that explores the searing firsthand accounts of American troops through their own words will also be shown.

Award winning journalist, Bill Kurtis will moderate the panel which includes; Richard Perle; Abdel Bari Atwan, Editor of Al Quds; Mahmood Mamdani- Herbert Lehman Professor of Government in the Departments of Anthropology and International Affairs, and Director of the Institute of African Studies at Columbia University; Sherman Jackson- Associate Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Department of Near Eastern Studies at The University of Michigan.

(Looks like a gathering that calls for some conservative support in the audience.)

UPDATE: More background from John Ruberry, Marathon Pundit, who follows DePaul and academic freedom issues closely.

Related posts: An Ancient Culture Extinguished, Terror Tactics Hit Home

Support Our Troops

If you'd like to support our troops in a tangible way, here are a few good sites. Congressman Kirk's office alerted us to some, friends to others.

A group out of Wadsworth, Il sends wounded heroes care packages (click on survival care package). They also established a foundation to help families of wounded veterans with immediate expenses:
For the time being, the all-volunteer foundation uses money it raises to help families get back on their feet, Dosev said. They help pay mortgages and energy bills, and grant money for plane tickets and hotel rooms so families don't have to choose between staying with their loved ones or making ends meet.
America Supports You, an official site with lots of ways to help and links to local groups around the country.

Operation Bit of Home, providing everyday personal care supplies, and an oasis of R&R in Iraq.

And this group, the ComPadres, founded by a Catholic priest and Wilmette native, Fr. John Barkemeyer, who is currently serving with the Army in Anbar province in Iraq. Donations can be made to the site, or if you live near Wilmette, one of the collection points will be the Loyola Academy Boat House. Volunteers will be sending new and used DVD's to the Camp. Also, any recent Sports Illustrated, news magazines, or other interesting reading would also be welcome. Ditto for chess, checkers, and playing cards. Collections for the care packages will be made through the end of next week.

God Bless our troops.

The Stuff of Nightmares

Well, you know the hysteria over global warming has reached its height when a supermarket chain is doing surveys. According to their numbers, half of UK children are having nightmares, anxious and losing sleep:
The most feared consequences of global warming included poor health, the possible submergence of entire countries and the welfare of animals.

Most of those polled understood the benefits of recycling, although one in 10 thought the issue was linked to riding a bike.
Enough already. Scaring little children. For shame. Al has a big award in his sights so he won't desist. You other pols who push this might consider you are creating a generation of cynics on climate change.

But then we know long term effects and unintended consequences are not your forté.

Previous post: Think Again

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Flower Power Obama


I thought Obama's recycled policies dated back to the 70's, but Thomas Sowell says he's even more outdated than that:
Senator Obama is being hailed as the newest and freshest face on the American political scene. But he is advocating some of the oldest fallacies, just as if it was the 1960s again, or as if he has learned nothing and forgotten nothing since then.
So Barack, in case your 60's file is not complete, here's a learning aid. Turn on, tune in, drop out.

Previous post: Scarlett O'Bama

Math:Stuck on Stupid

The math text used in Wilmette's District 39 is Everyday Math. K-4. This is math stuck on stupid. Despite protests of parents over the years, despite the NCTM acknowledgement that fuzzy math has fizzled, our kids are still stuck with these kind of books. In fact, we just replaced one fuzzy math set of books with another one.

Major portions of the text are devoted to geography-- "world tours" and the like. Pages and pages pay detailed attention to calculators----and why not---the authors think efficiency in arriving at correct math answers is a waste of time---just use a calculator.

So they encourage roundabout and error-prone ways of thinking about math to come up with the answer, ways their parents can't help them with. Lattices?? I can just imagine boys being told they have to draw little pictures before they can do the math problem.

And then they have to write math journals.

Watch this explanation by a meteorologist and a parent in the state of Washington, where they are struggling with the same issues. It's an eye opener.


Link to Illinois parent site that flagged the video here. More must-see videos. And find out what is going on in your Illinois district here.

Previous posts: Mediocrity Rules, Fuzzy Math Fizzles

An Ancient Culture Extinguished

Jews in Yemen, who have lived there for generations, have been threatened to leave or die. Many left for Israel years ago, but some did not want to leave their ancestral homes. This happened back in January:
Many of Yemen's Jews fled their homes last weekend after receiving death threats from Islamic militants accusing the country's tiny Jewish community of serving as agents for "global Zionism."

The Jews said they feared for their lives. It was disclosed that they had been forced to pay special taxes that Islam imposes on Jews and Christians in return for protection and security.

About 45 Jews left their village in Sa'ada county in Yemen after Dawoud Yousuf Mousa, one of the heads of the local Jewish community, was warned on Jan.10 that if the Jews don't leave within 10 days they would be exposed to killings, abductions and looting.

Four masked militants approached Mousa and delivered a letter to him warning that the Jewish community had been under Islamic surveillance.

"After accurate surveillance over the Jews residing in Al Haid, it has become clear to us that they were doing things which serve mainly global Zionism, which seeks to corrupt the people and distance them from their principles, their values, their morals, and their religion," the letter stated.

"Islam calls upon us to fight against the disseminators of decay," the letter said. The threats have been attributed to disciples of Shi'ite religious leader Hossein Bader a-Din al-Khouty.

They are now sheltering temporarily in a hotel in a regional city. Latest reports cite clashes between the government and Islamic terrorists. Reuters:

The clashes in Saada were re-ignited in late January after al-Houthi supporters threatened to kill members of a small Jewish community in Saada if they did not leave the country within 10 days.

Violence escalated after parliament on 10 February authorised the government to suppress the rebellion. The consultative Shoura council has also called on the government to settle the sedition in Saada in a way that maintains security and stability.

"By this rebellion, al-Houthi [the grandson], the terrorist, and his group want to enter the country into the kiln of conflicts in the context of a plot that aims to rip the nation apart and serve the interests of foreign parties," Abdul-Aziz Abdul-Ghani, Shoura Council Chairman, said.
Keith Roderick, The American Thinker exposes the double standard demanded by some Muslims in the West, while failing to confront intolerance by Muslim countries in the Middle East:
"Islamophobia," coined as a term to describe prejudice and fear against Muslims and Islam, has gained institutional legitimacy. It is now used to fend off criticism of anything negative arising from Muslims or Islam. Less a psychological state of irrational fear, it creates a pseudo-racial classification for Muslims and Islam that allows criticism of, or opposition to it, to be defined as racist.

Politically, the language of phobia is being used as a battering ram to weaken security measures and strengthen the radical agenda of Islamists who do not hide the fact that they want to transform the United States into an Islamic country governed by shari'a. These Islamists offer a caveat, that is, they want this transformation to be done without terrorism or violence, using only the political process to Islamicize American society.

There is another phenomenon of prejudice which has no such name, but whose effect is ongoing and devastating throughout the Islamic world. The "other' phobia demonizes non-Muslim minorities living in Islamic majority countries. Loathing of the "other" has been embedded into legal and political institutions in Islamic countries.
What was the supposed "crime" of the Yemeni Jews? Selling wine. "Their presence in the country predated the Muslims by centuries." And at the beginning of the 20th century, 20% of the population of the Middle East was Christian. Now it is 2%. Lebanon used to be a majority Christian country. No more.

Christians are being driven out of Bethlehem itself.

This is how an ancient culture is extinguished. Now they are coming after our younger, but still rich and more tolerant one. Dr. Roderick has an excellent suggestion for CAIR---open centers for religious tolerance for their co-religionists in the Middle East.

Just another lifestyle choice

The latest euphemism for abortion. Sex-screening. Page one story NY Times, "Korean Men Use Brokers to Find Brides in Vietnam:
The widespread availability of sex-screening technology for pregnant women since the 1980s has resulted in the birth of a disproportionate number of South Korean males. What is more, South Korea’s growing wealth has increased women’s educational and employment opportunities, even as it has led to rising divorce rates and plummeting birthrates.
This is not unique to South Korea, nor even to Asia.

Millions more baby girls than boys are being killed in the womb.

Just another lifestyle choice.

Previous post: The Other Global War

Check Your Mats

Sounds sensible. Tribune:
Citing a lack of space, Northwestern University athletic officials informed students last week that they would not be able to set aside a secluded area for Muslim students to pray during athletic events.

"Unfortunately, we are not able to meet your primary request to have designated prayer space at Ryan Field or Welsh-Ryan Arena," John Mack, external media affairs for Northwestern athletics, wrote in a letter. "There just aren't any spaces that are sufficient to meet your needs of a clean, quiet, enclosed space."

Mack said students are allowed to pray during games and can "feel free to use whatever available space they can find," as long as it does not disrupt traffic flow. Students can bring prayer mats to the stadiums and will be allowed to use the coat check to check their mats if there is one available.
Students continue to look for a "creative" solution. Leaving the stadium for a break and praying outside would work. Check your mats, hold your stubs.

Terror Tactics Hit Home

Today's Sun Times:
Two Chicago area cousins were charged Wednesday with scheming to "kill, kidnap or maim" Americans overseas, including troops in Iraq.

Zubair Ahmed, 27, of North Chicago and his cousin, Khaleel Ahmed, 26, of Chicago, had traveled to a convention in Cleveland and discussed sniper tactics with a trainer and "their desire to receive training in firearms and counter surveillance techniques," according to the indictment.

A little recruitment in Chicagoland.

Underlining the meaning of the words---we need to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them at home.

As you may recall, recently in the UK a "bookshop" owner, released from Gitmo, was arrested before he was able to kidnap and behead a Muslim British soldier who had arrived home after serving in Iraq.

Meanwhile, over there, for now, the latest terror tactic is using chlorine gas dirty bombs against civilians. NY Times:

It was at least the third truck bomb in a month to employ chlorine, a greenish gas also used in World War I, which burns the skin and can be fatal after only a few concentrated breaths. The bomb killed at least two people and injured 32 others, police and medical officials said.
Oh yes, of course there was no WMD in Iraq. Nope. Never. Not a trace. Not a drop. Saddam just had an inordinate appetite for chlorine, enough to fill the entire country with swimming pools and clean them several times over.

Previous posts: Your Liberty, My Liberty, The Invisible Jihad

UPDATE: More here from the Tribune. They are expected to go on trial in Cleveland this spring and are also accused of " planning to send money and computers to the Middle East". And this bit of info:
Two of those who were recruited were the Ahmeds, according to court documents. They were allegedly brought into the conspiracy by El-Hindi, who has Chicago ties. The Tribune has reported that El-Hindi, who used to live in the suburbs, ran a travel agency in the Loop near the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse that opened in the late 1990s and closed a few years ago.
UPDATE: Guess Saddam just stockpiled that chlorine by the palace pools. Providing a little R&R for Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Recently the US launched an airstrike on the village of Damadola in Pakistan. Predictable protests were lodged. We may not have gotten Zawahiri, but we got this guy, Abu Khabab. A little background on Al Qaeda's mad scientist, by Dan Darling, The Weekly Standard:
The unit was to be headed by Khabab; a large sum amounting to several thousand dollars was approved as its start-up budget. As of May 26, 1999, another computer file noted that Khabab had made "significant progress" with his work, a comment made all the more ominous by the discovery of al Qaeda videotapes aired on CNN in 2002, which showed Khabab and several assistants killing three dogs in crude chemical weapons experiments using what is believed to have been hydrogen cyanide, the same agent used by the in gas chambers in Nazi death camps.

How far Khabab got with al Zabadi before the war in Afghanistan is unknown, but according to the Robb-Silberman commission on weapons of mass destruction, U.S. intelligence had assessed prior to the invasion that al Qaeda "had small quantities of toxic chemicals and pesticides, and had produced small amounts of World War I-era agents such as hydrogen cyanide, chlorine, and phosgene . . . Training manuals . . . indicated that group members were familiar with the production and deployment of common chemical agents" and that unconfirmed reports "indicated that al-Qa'ida operatives had sought to acquire more modern and sophisticated chemical agents." [snip]

Since the failed European plots, Khabab's location and activities have been unknown


to the general public with the exception of a January 2004 report in the New York Post claiming that U.S. intelligence agencies were mounting a worldwide manhunt for him based on new intelligence that he had resumed his activities and may have been involved in the construction of a "dirty bomb" or other devices for use in terrorist attacks in the United States. [snip]

Those wishing to view his legacy need look no further than the extremely crude but deadly chemical and biological experiments set up under the auspices of Ansar al-Islam in northern Iraq prior to the U.S. invasion.

Home Invasion Murders

Two murders in two suburbs in broad daylight. A knock on the door, then death. Motives?

Very disturbing. In both cases, nearby schools and day care centers were closed as a precaution.

In Schaumberg, and Niles.

UPDATE: Trib puts the two stories together.

An Insult


Kareem the Egyptian blogger was sentenced to 4 years in prison yesterday. His crime? BBC:
A former student at al-Azhar, he called the institution "the university of terrorism" and accused it of suppressing free thought.

The university expelled him in 2006 and pressed prosecutors to put him on trial.

During the five-minute court session the judge said Soliman was guilty and would serve three years for insulting Islam and inciting sedition, and one year for insulting Mr Mubarak.

Al-Azhar is the country's "top Islamic institution". How much foreign aid do we give Egypt? On a hopeful note, al-Azhar's grand sheik agrees to meet with the pope in Rome. This should be on the agenda.

UPDATE: WaPo:

Egypt arrested a number of bloggers last year, most of them for connections to Egypt's pro-democracy reform movement. Nabil was arrested in November, and while other bloggers were freed, Nabil was put on trial _ a sign of the sensitivity of his writings on religion.

Hafiz Abou Saada, head of the Egyptian Human Rights Organization, described the verdict as "very tough"

Note to Hillary

The latest liberal attempt to show they care, (while attacking the Bush administration) but reveals their ignorance. Michelle Malkin, NRO, RCP, recently back from Iraq, on Hillary and her MSM allies continuing to charge that our troops are underequipped :
But the Army reminds its critics that it began the War on Terror “with equipment shortages totaling $56 billion from previous decades. In the last several years, the Army has transformed itself more than any other military in history and rapidly acquires ever-improving equipment on a scale not seen since World War II.” In Iraq alone, officials report, “the Army has gone from a low of 400 up-armored Humvees to nearly 15,000 up-armored Humvees patrolling neighborhoods, protecting troops and mitigating risk from most types of enemy munitions. As of this date, the Army has produced enough Frag Kit No. 5 Retrofit kits to outfit every Humvee in Afghanistan and Iraq. Thousands of these kits are being flown into theater every month and they are being installed in theater, 24 hours a day, seven days a week to ensure Soldiers have the best protection available.”

Capt. Aaron Kaufman of the Dagger Brigade at Forward Operating Base Justice, the unit my Hot Air partner Bryan Preston and I embedded with in Baghdad last month, told me: This is simply another red herring.
There's more good information in Michelle's piece.

So let's up the Defense Budget, which was starved under Bill Clinton, who wasted cruise missiles in wag the dog diversions. Let's be sure we budget the funds to pay for comfortable recuperation at home for our wounded troops.

Note to Hillary---put your money where your mouth is.

And here's another note. Tony Blankley:
Everyone from Democratic Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden to the liberal Brookings Institute to fierce and admired war critic Gen. Anthony Zinni to every Middle East diplomat one talks to (Turkish, Saudi, Jordanian, Israeli, Egyptian, et.al.) express the most profound concern for the consequences of American forces leaving Iraq naked to the raging passions and fears of the Middle East.
Given the fantastic pace and irresponsibility of the Democratic presidential primary campaign, this emerging What-me-worry? view of the day after we leave, probably will quickly become the de rigeur position of even the recently sensible candidates.
What next Hillary? Do you have a secret plan?

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

A Matter of Public Safety

Democrats are trying to sneak through a bill that will ensure mediocrity and complacency in an area where we can't afford it. WSJ:
Democrats figure they owe Big Labor for helping them take Congress, and now comes the payback. Tucked away in House and Senate bills that purport to implement the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission is a provision that the Commission most assuredly did not recommend: collective bargaining rights for the Transportation Safety Administration's 43,000 airport screeners.

Congress created TSA in 2001 without union rights on common sense grounds that the agency overseeing airport security was more like the Defense Department than, say, Agriculture. Unionization, with its myriad work rules, would make it harder for the executive branch to hire, fire, train and reassign workers to best meet changing terrorist threats.

No way do we want screeners to feel like they work for the union, and not for the public. It's a matter of public safety and we need full flexibility and accountability.

Life Issues

Another old video has surfaced of Romney on abortion which looks bad.

Here's his first ad.

And here is more video and a detailed defense of his actual record on life issues in Massachusetts, which put him to the test several times. It's actually a very decent record.

There is also video of McCain speaking on abortion.

Women Only Island


No, it's not a Bond movie set, or a feminist plot, it may be in scenic Iran, and you'll get to wear swimsuits like these for a little carefree sunbathing. I guess you get to take off the cap and "overcoat" when not in the presence of men. At Hot Air. Fashion here. I guess they are making better bloomers these days. We should only be thankful.

Oh, and this is the relatively racy look for moderates who allow members of the opposite sex to mix.

Scarlett O'Bama

Mr. Geffen of Hollywood has a high "level of disappointment in the behavior of America". He wants to bring the country together and has dumped the Clintons this time round. Hillary is polarizing and:
“I don’t think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person.”
Sounds like a little disappointment in the behavior of Bill and Hill.

So whO is the anOinted One (he picked so well last time)?

Enter the great Barack. Here's Maureen Dowd:
Barack Obama has made an entrance in Hollywood unmatched since Scarlett O’Hara swept into the Twelve Oaks barbecue. Instead of the Tarleton twins, the Illinois senator is flirting with the Dreamworks trio: Mr. Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, who gave him a party last night that raised $1.3 million and Hillary’s hackles.
Barack compared to Scarlett. The mind reels.

But Scarlett's most memorable phrase was "I'll think about it tomorrow", so it makes a certain amount of sense applied to the Big O'Bama, who has yet to come up with a plan on anything. He strikes me as more of a posturing Ashley Wilkes though.

But who can tell? Obama has himself said running a national campaign will be much like running the country. Win Hollywood and you win the world! Things are heating up, as he who claims the mantle of Lincoln dares to taunt Hillary about the Lincoln Bedroom.


Previous posts: Obama No Crisis, Obama an Inspiration

UPDATE: Tom Bevan on the risks of Obama going negative, already in play. And--Bill in the wings for the kill?

Death and Politics

Every life is precious, but some perspective here. Dadmanly, via Jules Crittenden:
Jonah Goldberg, posting at The Corner (here and here), highlights the factual basis behind what a lot of military people know intuitively, and goes virtually unrecognized by the media and the public whose trust they so willfully neglect.

We lose no more soldiers in Iraq than we would lose, on average, through training accidents, other accidents, and other causes. In other words, soldiers are no less safe (or no more in danger) in Iraq than they are anywhere else.

Sound incredible? It shouldn’t.

Because our soldiers are in Iraq, they are a target for terrorist attack, just as they are virtually anywhere in the world, and have been for two to three decades. Just as are diplomats, business people, and journalists.
Our soldiers sacrifice for us and in wartime and in peacetime. And the world has become a riskier place.

UPDATE: More perspective later in the same post:
The bottom line is that we're fighting this war with lower casualties than that expected from normal training accidents in a peacetime army.
And this:
The total military dead in the Iraq war between 2003 and this month stands at about 3,133. This is tragic, as are all deaths due to war, and we are facing a cowardly enemy unlike any other in our past that hides behind innocent citizens. Each death is blazoned in the headlines of newspapers and Internet sites. What is never compared is the number of military deaths during the Clinton administration: 1,245 in 1993; 1,109 in 1994; 1,055 in 1995; 1,008 in 1996. That's 4,417 deaths in peacetime but, of course, who's counting?
Meanwhile the defeatist Democrats demagogue these deaths to belittle their sacrifice and suggest our troops are not up to the task and can't win. What lies.

Previous posts: Die by the poll Dems, The Right Side of History, Dead Souls Democrats

The Flying Rock Menace


Flying Rocks in Space. The next menace. Dateline San Francisco. (that gives you a hint about where this is going.) Read about it here at the Powerline Forum. Pix courtesy of NASA.

Somewhat related post: Think Again

Red Skirt: Multiculti Trap


My updated post on the Multiculti Trap up at my Red Skirt column. Blue Skirt retreats to definitions and counsels diplomacy. As I've said before, it's hard to turn the other cheek when someone is trying to cut off your head.

More press on the hosting BoomerGirl site here.

Related posts: He had been disrespected, Hirsi Ali Speaks Up

Compare and Contrast

Tom Bevan, RCP blog:
You have to read all the way to the end of this Washington Post article on the Justice Department's willful neglect in handling the Sandy Berger case before being confronted with this astonishing quote by Berger's attorney, Lanny Breuer:
"It never ceases to amaze me how the most trivial things can be politicized. It is the height of unfairness . . . for this poor guy, who clearly made a mistake," Breuer said.

Stealing highly classified documents from the National Archives is "trivial?" You've got to be kidding.

Read it all. Compare and Contrast.

Related posts: The Steyn Variations, Trial in Error

Your Liberty, My Liberty

Unless supposed civil libertarians are planning on picking up a gun (which they've probably banned in their own communities--there go my civil liberties) and taking up arms against the US, and renouncing their US citizenship, they're safe from the indefinite arrest they so loudly protest. The Tribune headline blares, "Gitmo Detainees Denied":
In a 2-1 ruling, judges said the Constitution does not extend habeas corpus to non-citizens who are held outside the sovereign territory of this country. "Cuba--not the United States--has sovereignty over Guantanamo Bay," wrote Judge Raymond Randolph.
WaPo story here. They are non-citizens, held outside this country.
And they were captured on the battlefield, fighting against us. They do have the right for redress through military courts, under the law passed by Congress. Hmm, and wasn't one of those released from Gitmo in the news lately? Ah yes, a "bookshop owner" in the UK who was arrested in the thwarted plot to behead his neighbor.

So pick a better subject for your human rights' demonstrations. Like maybe the real political prisoners in Castro's hellhole of a country. Or maybe those who suffer in Iran.


Related post: Vive la Difference!

Family Members Gathered

(Sent to me with underlined emphasis by a regular reader and this comment: Family members gathered to remember the boy?!? No one questions the mother's decisions in life??!!) Tribune:
Cop knocks, mom rushes to her dying son
13-year-old beaten to death in gang fight

Pamela Hester-Jones woke up at 10:30 p.m. Monday to a Chicago police detective knocking on her apartment door.

"He asked me if I was Lazarus Jones' mother and when I said yes he said, `Your son's been injured,'" Hester-Jones said.

But it was worse. Lazarus, 13, an 8th grader at Budlong Elementary School, had been fatally beaten during a gang-related fight Monday night in the Albany Park neighborhood, police said.

Hester-Jones arrived at Children's Memorial Hospital in time to hold her son's foot and say a prayer before he died early Tuesday.

And although police have not determined if Lazarus was a gang member, his family insists he had no gang ties and was a good student who had no enemies.

"I don't know what happened to my son. It was a tragedy, a mistake. He wasn't in any gangs," his mother said.

Lazarus, of the 2500 block of West Foster Avenue, was "beaten with a blunt object" around 9:45 p.m. Monday outside a liquor store at 3132 W. Lawrence Ave., said Chicago Police Officer Hector Alfaro.

Hester-Jones said she last spoke to her son at 1:30 p.m. Monday as she was heading out the door to visit her other son, Jasper, who is in Cook County Jail.

She returned about 6:30 p.m. to an empty home but did not think much of it because Lazarus often plays outside with friends and has his own key, she said.

Assuming Lazarus would be home before 10 p.m., and exhausted from a long day, Hester-Jones, who is five months' pregnant, took a nap and woke up to the detective's knocking on her door.

On Tuesday, family members gathered to remember the boy who they said enjoyed roller skating, writing in his journal, drawing, surfing the Internet and golfing.

He was looking forward to going to high school and possibly running track or playing golf, Hester-Jones said.

On Tuesday, balloons, teddy bears and flowers created a makeshift memorial where he was killed.

Police had no one in custody Tuesday evening.
Family members gathered...after he was dead.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Obama No Crisis

Endorsement from Gov. of Virginia. Big crescendo. Using the royal we, Obama tells us his identity crisis is over. Video at WaPo.

Huh?

(as you can tell I am already bored of this Obama campaign. Good night.)

Previous: Obama an Inspiration

Gore the Greatist Gift

The American Spectator's The Prowler, on Penguin Politics (scroll down):
Former Vice President Al Gore has been spending the bulk of his time campaigning hard with voting members of the Academy for Motion Picture Arts, committing more than $500,000 of his own money to the PR campaign set up to win him an Oscar.

When Gore and his aides were approached about providing similar dollar amounts in support of ending the slaughter in Darfur, he declined, say fundraisers for the Darfur initiative.
Another anecdote that shores up the Who Really Cares research. Al Gore---compassion in action!

Remember when Gore ran for president his tax returns showed he only gave something like $300 to charity? I guess he considers himself the greatest gift of all.

Vive la difference!

Wow. The French combine foreign policy appeasement of terrorist states with ruthless anti-terrorist measures at home. And they openly admit it, with pride. Bret Stephens, WSJ:
"Every single attempt to bomb France since 1995 has been stopped before execution," notes a former Interior Ministry senior official. "The French policy has been [to] make sure no terrorist hits at home. We know perfectly well that foreign-policy triangulation is not sufficient for that, [even if] it helps us go down a notch or two in the order of priority [jihadist] targets. So we've complemented our anti-U.S. foreign policy with ruthless domestic measures."
We know the Dems are headed down the road to appeasement, but have they thought it all through? Even the French know we are the number one terror target in the world, aside from Israel. Will the Dems follow through on the logical consequence of not fighting terror abroad?

Yup, fighting it at home. And unless the Dems want the FDNY or the CFD (that's Chicago) to be our first defenders against terror after the fact, a compromise in civil liberties may have to pick up the slack under Dem "leadership".

Are the Dems be prepared to be ruthless a la the French model? Given liberals' propensity to view their innocent neighbors with great suspicion, while granting terror suspects every benefit of the doubt, we'd all be in for a rough ride. Here are the measures the French routinely use, inherited from, ahem, Napoleonic Law:
Consider the powers granted to Mr. Bruguiere and his colleagues. Warrantless wiretaps? Not a problem under French law, as long as the Interior Ministry approves. Court-issued search warrants based on probable cause? Not needed to conduct a search. Hearsay evidence? Admissible in court. Habeas corpus? Suspects can be held and questioned by authorities for up to 96 hours without judicial supervision or the notification of third parties. Profiling? French officials commonly boast of having a "spy in every mosque." A wall of separation between intelligence and law enforcement agencies? France's domestic and foreign intelligence bureaus work hand-in-glove. Bail? Authorities can detain suspects in "investigative" detentions for up to a year. Mr. Bruguiere once held 138 suspects on terrorism-related charges. The courts eventually cleared 51 of the suspects -- some of whom had spent four years in preventive detention -- at their 1998 trial.

In the U.S., Mr. Bruguiere's activities would amount to one long and tangled violation of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution.
So maybe the Dems should support our troops over in Iraq. And get a grip at home. W is no emperor. Vive la difference!

Iran on the Brink

On the eve of the latest UN deadline Iran continues to defy the international community in developing nuclear capabilities, supposedly for peaceful energy purposes, laughable from a major world oil supplier. And at the same time it proclaims this peaceful development Iran openly calls for the destruction of one of its neighbors---the one nuke final solution for Israel.

But for those who still think ignoring the whole issue will make it go away, think again. The MAD deterrence of the Cold War won't work here. As Iran realizes, Israel is not far. But neither is Iran from other threatened and interested parties. Robert Haddick, TCS, RCP says passivity will lead to an arms race:
We won't find these stabilizing conditions when a complicated, three-sided nuclear arms race breaks out among Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. In the Middle East missile flight times are too short - a sneak attack would be very effective. Early warning systems are fragile or non-existent, and retaliatory forces and command and control structures will be vulnerable to destruction in a first strike. Relatively small nuclear arsenals will result in no survivable retaliatory redundancy. Nuclear forces will have to be kept on extremely high alert, a launch-on-warning status. The slightest hint of attack, even if false, will trigger a nuclear weapons launch. Under such conditions, there would be a tremendous incentive in a crisis for any of the countries to rapidly use its nuclear forces before they were destroyed. National survival will depend on disarming the enemies before being so disarmed.
Iran is on the brink of making a monumental mistake. Will the West just watch, or hold firm to hold back the coming catastrophe.

UPDATE: Don't count much on Europe, as usual, especially Germany and France. WSJ:
In the absence of an official embargo against Tehran, private EU companies have sought commercial opportunities in Iran. But the real story here is that these businesses are subsidized by European taxpayers. Government-backed export guarantees have fueled the expansion in trade. That, in turn, has boosted Iran's economy and--indirectly by filling government coffers with revenues--its nuclear program.

Die by the poll Dems

Since the Dems make a practice of sticking their fingers in the wind, it may be live by the poll, die by the poll. A couple of polls show a shift in the winds for winning the war. AP-Ipsos, via Brendan Miniter, WSJ, RCP:
In mid-January an Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that public support for President Bush's troop surge increased to 35%, up from 26% a few weeks earlier. The same poll found that a slim majority of Americans were against the war in Iraq, but 68% said they opposed shutting off funds to fight it, and 60% said they would oppose Congress's withholding funds necessary to send additional troops.
Now we have a poll released today, by the well-regarded POS. Summary at Powerline:
These poll results suggest that, apart from the irresponsibility of their position on the merits, the Democrats' defeatist approach to Iraq may not be a winning political strategy. In fact, the Dems' approach may be a dubious political strategy precisely because of its weakness on the merits.

According to the survey, conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, 57 percent of Americans say “The Iraq War is a key part of the global war on terrorism.” 57 percent also “support finishing the job in Iraq, that is, keeping the troops there until the Iraqi government can maintain control and provide security for its people."

Also an earlier poll from Investors Business Daily. The outcome in Iraq is not certain, but the Democrats' strategy embraces certain defeat. Americans don't like gutless defeatists and whiners. We want to support our troops, finish the job in Iraq and win the war on terror.

UPDATE: Ed Koch, former mayor of NYC, "Will Embarrassing the President Make Us Safer?":
Democrats and some Republicans in Congress are seeking to humble, embarrass and, if they can, destroy the President and the prestige of his position as the Commander-in-Chief who is responsible for the safety of our military forces and the nation's defenses. By doing so, they are adding to the dangers that face our nation. And so I ask again them again: do you think that leaving a power vacuum in Iraq will make us safer? If, as a result of the power vacuum, the terrorists are emboldened and God forbid we sustain here in the U.S. civilian casualties comparable to those caused in Iraq by car bombs, will you publicly accept responsibility?

Kirk Statement

(Although I don't support his vote, and have told him so, here is Congressman Kirk's full statement. Congressman Kirk went on active duty in Navy intelligence for the months of November and December, and continues to be in the Naval Reserve) This statement is posted on his blog.)

Feb. 16, 2007
Iraq War Resolution
Our uniformed men and women gave great service to our nation by ending a tyrant’s reign and fostering elections in a region that only knew dictatorship. In my judgment, the time for military action led by American or British forces is ending and the Iraqi stage should be delivered to the new local leaders to work out their own differences.

I support the House resolution that recommends against the troop surge. The United States should increase the responsibilities of the elected Iraqi government to solve its own problems, while reducing the number of American combat troops sent overseas.

I did not come to this conclusion lightly. The long-term security of our country depends on the United States not being defeated in the Middle East. To prevent a collapse of democracy, tolerance and our supporters in that region, we should implement a new plan that relies on America’s key strengths, building support among all our citizens and allies.

Looking back in the last years, our troops in Iraq achieved two major objectives. First they ended the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein, a leader who invaded two separate United Nationals member countries and ordered the murder of several hundred thousand Iraqis. Second, they backed the United Nations and its sponsorship of Iraq’s three national elections that approved a new constitution and government. Iraq is no longer a military threat to her neighbors or minorities – especially Kurdish families – who no longer fear that a third genocide campaign will be launched by their very own government. These are major achievements worthy of the bravery and sacrifice of Americans in uniform.

Iraq now faces new challenges that should be solved by Iraqis – not the U.S. military. Iraq’s government, lead by a Kurdish President and a Shia Prime Minister, face a daunting enemy, composed of people who would restore the old dictatorship or worse. This struggle is primarily political, not military. Foreign troops – be they American, British or otherwise – are not well-suited to advance the elected government’s writ.

In the coming months, we should build a longer-term plan for the United States and our allies in the Middle East. Man-for-man, Iraqi combat troops operating under the authority of their own elected government are better suited for this mission than Americans for the front lines of Iraq. The U.S. military does offer unique advantages to the Iraqi government in our ability to provide the Iraqi Army and Police with logistics, communications, training and intelligence. Over the coming months, Americans should be focused on these missions, making our Iraqi allies more effective in extending the authority of the elected government. By winding down the combat duties of Americans, we will dramatically lower the risk to our men and women stationed overseas while still providing a decisive advantage to Iraq’s elected government. This is how to win the battle to secure a lasting democratic government for the Iraqi people.

Our plan should be strengthened by a major diplomatic initiative among Iraq’s neighbors and the World Bank to support the elected government’s plans for reconstruction. To date, the World Bank has been absent without leave in Iraq, despite Iraq’s status as a founding member of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank’s official title). Our effort, based on key American advantages while reducing the number of American combat troops, will improve the prospects for peace and build support for our goals here and among our allies. I join with many numbers today to say that if it were up to us, we recommend a different course of action that involves less risk to Americans.

As a military man, I am fully aware that the Constitution does not place 535 Members of Congress in the military chain-of-command. Americans who wear the uniform are also not shy in discussing various courses of action. They have as many opinions on various options as any civilian community.

That is their birthright as Americans.

But as volunteers who wear the uniform, they take on an additional heavy obligation to make a decision, to bring an end to debate and confront the enemies of the United States as brothers and sisters united by a common bond.

In the coming days, our troops will face danger, not as Democrats, Independents or Republicans, but as Americans. We in Congress should draw on their strength that once the decision is made. When a course of action is set, we are not neutral in the contest. If Americans are engaged in combat, we are for the Americans winning. We will give them the tools to bring an end to the conflict as rapidly as possible. The debate in Congress will soon close and the course will be set. For those Americans who serve farthest from home, they should know that after a vigorous debate, their democracy will make a decision, and back those men and women charged with its implementation with everything needed to succeed.

Purposely Provocative

So the NY Times has a story on a children's book with the word scrotum on the first page, chosen for a Newbery Award by the powers that be, who huff censorship at the questions some children's librarians have raised. (Another argument for school choice.)
“This book included what I call a Howard Stern-type shock treatment just to see how far they could push the envelope, but they didn’t have the children in mind,” Dana Nilsson, a teacher and librarian in Durango, Colo., wrote on LM_Net, a mailing list that reaches more than 16,000 school librarians. “How very sad.”
You have to wonder as well why the Newbery committee chose the book, hmm, possibly to push and provoke just such a reaction, or see if they could get away with it. We all need to be educated, you see, that parental prudery is not to be tolerated. (Parents would call it being protective.) No, the little darlings should benefit from what the Newberry PC brahmins think is age-appropriate. Here's the author, from LA:
Reached at her home in Los Angeles, Ms. Patron said she was stunned by the objections. The story of the rattlesnake bite, she said, was based on a true incident involving a friend’s dog.

And one of the themes of the book is that Lucky is preparing herself to be a grown-up, Ms. Patron said. Learning about language and body parts, then, is very important to her.

“The word is just so delicious,” Ms. Patron said. “The sound of the word to Lucky is so evocative. It’s one of those words that’s so interesting because of the sound of the word.”

Oh, and the Washington Post also has a story on young people the same day, "Saying Goodbye to Girlhood"---on how psychologists are concerned that young girls are being sexualized at too young an age.

Some may blame the media, some the fashion industry, but I would say feminists and liberals should shoulder some of the responsibility, by "celebrating" sex for its own sake. And delighting in undermining moms and families with more traditional values.


Related posts: It's Educational!,Plan B Over the Counter, Inappropriate Behavior,Taking Their Innocence

UPDATE: Apparently the Trib saw the same story in the NY Times, the liberal journal of record. The Trib pooh-poohs objections, but inadvertently makes the case for a little discretion on children's bookshelves in the public schools. Potty humor could also be left off the school reading lists. But the Tribune itself says the word is gratuitous "It's a tale that could have been told without the word scrotum", and ends with this " If librarians don't want to answer those questions, we have three more words to suggest: "Ask your parents." Precisely. But that's also the point. Parents might also not want to explain sex graphically to a 10 year old, the basics are enough.

You see, these are the public schools, not even the public libraries, where parents could exercise some discretion of their own. Maybe they cherish their child's childhood, what a concept. I remember my kids' 5th grade, where book after book was about death. 10 years old. Kind of depressing, even for an adult.

Parents should have an expectation that the public schools have higher standards, not lower ones. But that is probably too much to ask, I know.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Portman the Porkbuster!!!

Arguably the preeminent porkie politician in Congress, even Sen. Robert Byrd is supposedly on board to eliminate earmarks. Or maybe he's finally gotten bored of naming the entire state of West Virginia after himself. Whatever the reason, we'll take it. WSJ:
On Thursday, White House budget director Rob Portman issued little-noticed guidance to all federal departments and agencies that no Congressional requests for spending should be accommodated unless they are "specifically identified in statutory text" -- which is to say, the law.

This may sound like it ought to be regular practice, but it's a revolution in the Beltway. That's because, in order to dodge the legislative earmark limits that Mr. Byrd has been bragging about, Members have been speed-dialing executive branch officials and asking them to fund their specific earmark requests out of agency budgets even though they were purged from the larger budget bill. This Congressional lobbying can be hard for the average federal bureaucrat to refuse, since he doesn't want to offend those on Capitol Hill who control his budget. Mr. Portman's directive is intended to stiffen these backbones against such Congressional extortion.

If the attempt succeeds in reducing earmarks, this means the Fiscal 2007 federal budget could have the fewest number of these pork-barrel projects in many a year.
Kudos to Rob Portman, who used to be a congressman himself, and hopefully has shut down the big-talkin' big spenders.

Schooling the Gliberals

David Warren, our friend to the North, on the gliberals, via RCP:
For such people, a threat is just a threat, a warlike act -- unless it is directed towards President Bush, or some more local bogeyman, in which case it becomes a natural expression of a nearly cosmic antipathy. The most blood-curdling cries from Iranian ayatollahs, to exterminate all Americans and Jews in a nuclear holocaust, can be shrugged off as just a little overdone. But should the U.S. president reply, “We will defend ourselves,” he will provoke a great glowing rage among them. How dare Bush utter threats?

They do not think of themselves as siding with, e.g. the ayatollahs. Not even the Iranian man in the street does that. They think they are on the side of pellucid virtue. But the paradox there is: no, they are on the side of the ayatollahs.
Trying to explain the concept of Reagan's peace through strength to the next generation of well-schooled fools.

Related post: Schakowsky the Holocaust Denier

SIX repeat SIX BILLION


Here it is. Crain's:
Contending that Illinois business doesn't pay its fair share of the cost of government, Gov. Rod Blagojevich is crafting a sweeping revamp of the state's corporate tax system that would cost business as much as $6 billion a year.
Hat tip Reverse Spin with more commentary. But that will just be a drop in the bucket, so we're all next.

And there's evidence we'll get hit anyway of course:
Mr. Johnson, the former revenue director, raises another concern: research indicating that about 70% of the cost of levies such as a gross-receipts tax either are passed on to consumers or forced onto workers in the form of lower wages, he says.
And Michigan just got rid of this kind of tax because it made their businesses uncompetitive. Worst of all, this tax is not being used to pay down debt, but to start yet another new program we can't afford.

Family Disowns Egyptian Blogger

Michelle Malkin:
There's a horrid development in the case of Abdul Kareem Nabeel Suleiman, the Egyptian blogger on trial for posting to his website statements calling for equal rights for women and protection of free speech, as well as other statements critical of the Egyptian government and Islam. The Free Kareem website reports:

Reported by Al-Masree Al-Yawm (The Egyptian Today), with thanks to Dalia.

The article is in Arabic. Here’s my translation:

Family of Al-Azhar Student, Accused of “Contempt of Religion”, Disowns Him Before His Court Verdict Session

Written by Nabeel Abu Shal and Tamer Al-Sharqawy
18/2/2007

The family of Al-Azhar student Abdul Kareem Nabeel Suleiman, accused of “contempt of religion”, has disowned him before his court verdict session on the upcoming Thursday. His father, a retired mathematics teacher, has demanded applying the Sharia [Islamic law] ruling on him by giving him three days to repent, followed by having him killed if he does not announce his repentance.

He had been disrespected

Well, this is a new one. Sun Times:
A man charged with the beating death of his wife and two female relatives allegedly videotaped himself on his cell phone after the attack, apologizing and saying he felt he had been disrespected, a law enforcement source said Sunday.
The man, recently arrived from Iran, also expressed regret to his surviving daughter. Investigators are reviewing the tape to determine a motive. He had been disrespected...motive enough for some.

If she'd killed him back in Iran, she might have been stoned to death. And he might have been hung, but probably not if it was considered an honor killing. They save the hangings for political prisoners over there.

Related post: Hirsi Ali Speaks Up

UPDATE: Trib story here. (Note, the earlier version of the Tribune story has been updated. The earlier version, which I linked to this morning, clearly stated that the man was a Christian, escaping religious persecution in Iran. But I would say, he didn't escape the culture.)

UPDATE: Honor killing spurs outcry in Syria. CSM via NRO.

Think Again

John Linder, Washington Times, RCP, "Global warming theory and the eugenics precedent", pointing out the last time we had such a massive wave of politicized science, such an overwhelming consensus of opinion from the bright and beautiful Boxers and Waxmans of the world. Read it all, but here's this:
Twenty-nine states passed laws allowing sterilization. Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were sterilized -- some legally. The Germans were the most progressive. They had help. The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its central racial scientists, one of whom was Josef Mengele.
Ultimately the "mental defectives" in Germany were brought to newly built houses where they were interviewed. They were then shown to a back room where they were gassed. Eventually the German program was expanded into a vast network that killed 10 million undesirables. After World War II many of the public adherents to the pseudoscience of eugenics went silent. Colleges removed the textbooks and stopped teaching it.
But not everyone went away. As recently as July 24, 2003 Tony Platt testified before the California Senate Judiciary Committee on S.R. 20 relative to eugenics. He agreed that the state should apologize for its actions.
One must ask, "How in the world did university researchers come to conclusions that defended this outrageous affront to society?" A look back at the research concluded that the researchers adjusted their outcomes to support the theory of those paying for the research. This is not unusual. It is very easy to believe that the settled science regarding climate change is just as suspicious, and indeed may be another example of pseudo-science capturing the imagination of politicians, actors and the media elite who have a desperate need to embrace some "science" which may force us to change the way we live our lives. H. L. Mencken once wrote, "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it." We see pictures of huge blocks of ice crashing into the sea from the Antarctic Peninsula, which comprises about 2 percent of the continent. The fact that the remaining 98 percent of Antarctica is growing by 26.8 gigatons of ice per year is ignored.
Linder presents other observable facts that have been largely ignored. And those who question global warming are equated to Holocaust deniers. Think again.

Previous post: Always Hysterical, Czech President: Gore Meltdown

The Other Global War

Not a bad article by Nancy Gibbs in Time on the grassroots efforts to win hearts and minds in the abortion war. Crisis pregnancy centers now outnumber abortion clinics. The print issue tilts the bias left with a cover shot of tiny models of fetal development, and asks---are they playing fair?

I wonder if Time has ever done a cover story---Planned Parenthood, are they playing fair?

I seem to recall a story about Planned Parenthood covering up the abortion of a 14 year old girl who was impregnated by a 21 year old. The NY Times neglects to mention that the older man was the girl's soccer coach, and she was 13 at the time of the statutory rape. I guess Planned Parenthood and the NY Times think sex is always consensual. The case is still pending. Playing fair?

And oh, let's see, according to Planned Parenthood, Time's last big cover story, for which they received an award from the group, was "The Population Curse" during the Reagan administration. Sounds like a balanced title, hmm?

Of course, now much of the developed world is facing a population BUST, especially in Old Europe. But the developing world is facing a particular population bust, with started with the advent of legal abortions, and in particular, China's one child policy.

Girls are being aborted now all over the world at greater rates than boys.

Has Time magazine done a cover story on this?

Has the UN raised the alarm?

Here is a reference to the problem by Physicians for Life:
Renowned scholar Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt [American Enterprise Institute (AEI)] made a striking presentation at the UN 7Dec06 when he pointed out the global epidemic of sex selected abortions that is permanently skewing the demographic profile of the world. He warned delegates of the growing global gender imbalance due to prenatal sex selection and sex selected abortions. Calling the trend a “Global War Against Baby Girls”, Eberstadt delivered extensive statistics on the rise of “son preference” in every part of the world.
Refuting the assumptions that preference for baby boys is a localized cultural phenomenon or due solely to coercive population programs, Eberstadt’s research reveals that imbalance is due to several factors: an existing preference for sons, a decrease in overall fertility, and the exponential increase in the use of technology which facilitates sex selection in the prenatal stages. He also emphasized that a rise in education levels does not slow the problem and in some cases is associated with increases in aborting baby girls.
According to Eberstadt, natural birth rates are about 105 males for every 100 females born. Some regions of the world are experiencing upwards of 115 boys born for every 100 girls, some are as high at 150 boys born for every 100 girls. He warned delegates that this could just be the beginning and that the world is “moving to the realm of science fiction” as the ratio of baby boys to baby girls was already at levels “beyond nature.” Citing a recent study, Eberstadt said that even now there are 20 million “missing” baby girls in Asia alone, that sex-selected abortions have permanently skewed the demographic balance of China and are in the process of skewing the demographic balance of India. He also showed the way that the trend has crept into Eastern Europe and Latin America, and that almost every African state is showing signs of vulnerability to the phenomenon.
Full text here. And what are the other consequences of that imbalance? An increase in sex trafficking of girls, and yup, national security issues.

So some perspective here is wise. It's a healthy trend to have more crisis pregnancy centers in the US than abortion clinics. Because there's more than one kind of unintended consequence to consider. And the moral dimensions are greater than any of us might have expected over 30 years ago when Roe v. Wade was decided, when the feminists and their allies on the Supreme Court decided to play God.

I remember when my kids were little, I was so upset I put a bumper sticker on my car---SHE's a child, not a choice. I thought maybe I could get through with that message. Someone keyed it off at the Park District Parking lot. So after that I was kind of bitter and thought, why should I care so much if feminists are killing their own babies? Why indeed.


UPDATE: Related story on the dangers of the conventional wisdom powered through as policy by the elites, "Global-warming theory and the eugenics movement". John Linder, Washington Times, RCP:
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was one of the most vocal adherents. She established the first "birth control" clinic in 1916.
They believed that "the best" human beings were not having as many children as inferior ones -- the foreigners, immigrants, Jews, Blacks, degenerates, the unfit and the "feeble minded." Sanger said "fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty." She spoke of the burden of caring for "this dead weight of human waste." H.G. Wells spoke against "ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens." Roosevelt said, "Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind." George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind.


Related posts: Hot Talk and the Skeptics

Cronyism for Goons

If there's anything that illustrates more clearly the wrongs of the patronage system, it's the criminal behavior of Todd Stroger's goons at Cook County Hospital. Beating up pregnant women, old men, and now caught on camera cuffing reporters. Sun Times:
In operating independently of the Sheriff's Department, the security force at the hospital gets away with hiring the equivalent of bouncers -- many of them patronage workers with no law enforcement experience. The sooner the plug can be pulled on what looks like cronyism for goons, the better. Other institutions in the city and county have outsourced their security; Stroger Hospital should come to terms with this pattern of misconduct and do the same.
I suppose these guys are more of Todd's close, personal friends. Now that they've been caught beating up reporters maybe something will be done. We would have preferred more power of the press on behalf of the people before the election though.

And what do Stroger's powerful Dem supporters have to say about this cronyism for goons?

........Riiiight.

P.S. Related story on a Rezko firm remodeling our Goon, uh good Governor's house. Sun Times:
Chicago Construction was tapped for the Blagojevich project after Rezko sought favors from the governor. In January 2003, Rezko submitted a list of 19 names he wanted Blagojevich to appoint to state boards and commissions. Ten of those either got appointments, won lucrative state business or had relatives placed on the government payroll.

Besides helping people on Rezko's wish list, Blagojevich named two former Rezko employees to high-ranking state agency directorships starting in late January 2003.

In October, federal prosecutors accused Rezko of defrauding Illinois taxpayers and said he helped shake down a company seeking state pension business for political contributions to the governor. Rezko is fighting the charges, and Blagojevich has said he knew nothing of Rezko's alleged wrongdoing.

The governor's use of a political fund-raiser to make his home more comfortable contradicts the governor's campaign pledge to change business as usual, the BGA's Stewart said.

"I'm quite confident if this fact pattern had occurred with George Ryan or Jim Ryan, candidate Blagojevich would have talked about it in 2002 and pointed to it as a bad thing," Stewart said, referring to Blagojevich's predecessor and GOP opponent five years ago.

It's a BAD THING. Read the rest of the story for Rezko's roll call of real estate deals with other pols and pals.

And because Chicago's clout affects us all, and we all love the beautiful City on the lake Mayor Daley has worked to rebuild, please mayor, lead the way as well in cleaning up corruption in Chicago. Trib editorial and qualified endorsement for reelection here.


Previous posts: Cut Cook County Fat, The Four Felons, It Never Ends, In No Way Related

Obama an Inspiration

The Obama backlash starts at home in Chicago. Via the LA Times:
As the 24-year-old mentor to public housing residents, Obama says he initiated and led efforts that thrust Altgeld's asbestos problem into the headlines, pushing city officials to call hearings and a reluctant housing authority to start a cleanup.

But others tell the story much differently.

They say Obama did not play the singular role in the asbestos episode that he portrays in the best-selling memoir, "Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance." Credit for pushing officials to deal with the cancer-causing substance, according to interviews and news accounts from that period, also goes to a well-known, pre-existing group at Altgeld Gardens and to a local newspaper called the Chicago Reporter. Obama does not mention either one in his book.

"Just because someone writes it doesn't make it true," said Hazel Johnson, a longtime Altgeld resident who worked with Obama on the asbestos campaign, and who began pushing for a variety of environmental cleanups years before he arrived.
Rep. Bobby Rush backs her up. Another agrees, but says, "we did all the work, but he was our inspiration". But Hazel Johnson's daughter asks, "why did he paint us all as so pathetic?". The answer from another community organizer---"It's his movie".

Quite a testimonial.


Previous post: Dowd's Delicious Dish, Barackometer

McCain: We're Americans

John McCain has his new site up. Lots of good video. Crisp, clear.

On the issues. "Common sense conservatism". A timely tribute to Reagan---America the force for good in the world.

He seems quietly determined in his videos. And he's got that pride in America that he fought for. And is still fighting for.

Northern Lights Probed


The US and Canada cooperate in a NASA rocket launch.
Scientists hope the $200 million US project will help them figure out what causes the substorms behind the shimmering northern lights, or aurora borealis, seen in northern skies.
Even growing up in northern Wisconsin I don't remember seeing the northern lights very often. It's like the cry of a loon. Unearthly and beautiful.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Schakowsky the Holocaust Denier

Meg brought this post to my attention, see previous post and comment, "The Invisible Jihad", and discussion of the Democrats' and the Left's anti-Christian bigotry. Paul Miller in The American Thinker points out its increasing anti-Semitism, and specifically the behavior of Jan Schakowsky:
The Illinois representative ignored blatant anti-Semitic attacks in her presence two years later when she attended a mock Judiciary Committee hearing. In plain view of a C-SPAN audience she sat behind Congressman Moran as he questioned former intelligence analyst Ray McGovern. The ex-intelligence analyst claimed that the U.S. went to war for oil, military bases and Israel. Moran thanked McGovern for his "candid answer," which also included comments claiming the war was conducted so the "U.S. and Israel could dominate that part of the world." Schakowsky just sat there and didn't raise an eyebrow.

A large crowd watched the hearing at DNC Headquarters. During the broadcast, activists handed out documents that claimed an Israeli company had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks. Once again her political allies unleashed anti-Jewish propaganda as she kept her head in the sand. Not until Washington Post Reporter, Dana Milbank, wrote an article exposing the event did any apology come from the DNC. Schakowsky never criticized her colleagues or personally apologized for the incident.

Recently Jewish Leftists have acknowledged there is an anti-Semitic agenda among Progressives, one that has gained prominence within the anti-war movement.

Of course, liberals, actually Marxists like Schakowsky view the world through a class warfare lens, whether it has any basis in reality or not. In truth, the biggest profiteers in that part of the world are Leftie countries like France and Russia, not the capitalist US. But in this case they are giving a state-terrorist country like Iran the rope to eventually hang them. Iran, with its avowed one-nuke final solution for Israel. I noticed Schakowsky wasn't at the rally for Israel last summer, when its existence was threatened yet again. And one of the reasons we went to war in Iraq was surely to stop this:
And real torture under Saddam Hussein in Iraq here from a British government dossier, and here, according to the State Dept:
A system of collective punishment tortures entire families or ethnic groups for the acts of one dissident. Women are raped and often videotaped during rape to blackmail their families. Citizens are publicly beheaded, and their families are required to display the heads of the deceased as a warning to others who might question the politics of this regime.
And mass murder of several hundred thousand occurred in Iraq under Saddam Hussein.
Yes, Congressperson Schakowsky, who is on my ballot like it or not in the 9th, always says she's fighting for you. She's a "fighter for families". But when it really counts, she sides with the ayatollahs of intolerance. She sides with the terrorists of Tehran. She sides with the murderers who bomb women and children in bakeries and pizza parlors. Yes,
quite the warrior feminist, issuing proclamations. And her Wikipedia bio says she's of Polish and Jewish origin.

But I guess that's only convenient at election time.

The rest of the time she is a present-day and future Holocaust denier.


Previous posts: The New Anti-Semitism, A Clear Choice, The Anti-Semitic Enablers of the Democrat Party, The See No Evil Peaceniks

The Invisible Jihad

It's "sudden jihad syndrome".

It's the invisible jihad in America.

Investor's Business Daily:
It looks like the Muslim teen who opened fire on shoppers in a Salt Lake City mall is yet another case of "sudden jihad syndrome," a condition in which normal-appearing American Muslims abruptly turn violent.

Taken together, this and other cases add up to an invisible jihad inside America. But don't tell that to the FBI. The politically correct bureau does everything it can to avoid recognizing the obvious Islamic factor in these heinous crimes.

They say it was 'inexplicable".

There have been at least 8 other "inexplicable" incidents around the country. Others have been prevented, due to monitoring of "inexplicable" plots. Thankfully only liberals find the monitoring itself inexplicable. No need for any undercover stuff. They see obvious plots among their neighbors--- supposed Christian theocrats. It is not Christians, though, who are engaging in mass shootings.

It's not just the FBI that has been reluctant to talk about this. The MSM has chosen to edit out that part of the story as well, not just stories here, but those abroad. Hirsi Ali, in her talk here the other day, suggested that America was guilty of appeasement by not publishing the Danish cartoons.

And then there was Sept. 11th itself. Jihad has come to America.

Oh, and the matter of a CAIR package here or there.

Shopping malls. As American as apple pie.


Earlier related post: Why Do They Hate Us?, A Random Act

UPDATE: Here's another one. From 10 years ago, we find out the truth about an attack at the Empire State Building. Oh, and the "martyr's" daughter now works for the UN. She reveals this as she is proud of her father. At LGF.

Obscene Amenities

WaPo does a story on shortcomings at Walter Reed for our recovering soldiers. Guess these are the "obscene amenities" their blogger William Arkin sneered about. We need to do more. Dems threatening to block funds for reinforcements and the rest of the military budget is not the way.

Think about what is at stake. You deny funds you defeat a soldier. And Bush's defeat is America's defeat.


Related posts: The Right Side of History, Dead Souls Democrats, The McGoverning Dems

UPDATE: Dems, you break it, you own it. Robert J. Caldwell, via RCP, on "The party of defeat". Ushering in AGAIN a mass slaughter that will make Darfur look like a picnic. Which they still will have done nothing about.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Trial in Error

What a farce. Byron York, WaPo, RCP on the question-that-must-not-be-asked. And Victoria Toensing has questions of her own about the prosecution by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald is one of the few bright spots in cleaning up corruption in Chicago and Illinois, but has erred badly in selectively prosecuting Scooter Libby, where no underlying crime was committed.

Previous post: Trib gets it wrong

Friday, February 16, 2007

Always Hysterical

R. Emmett Tyrrell with the definitive word, "Global Warming is our Friend":
No one can count on dinner at an outdoor cafe until June, and it was not until mid-June that President Bill Clinton would forsake his tricky indoor recreations for his beloved golf course. Now it is rumored that the forthcoming report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will predict that its earlier reports of global warming were exaggerated.

Thus, we might all ask why the opponents of global warming are so hysterical. Basically they are led by the same environmentalists who have been so wrong in the past, and they are always hysterical.
So take the only sensible approach and embrace global warming. What's a degree or two among friends. And throw a bucket of cold water on Al-ways hysterical Al Gore.

Previous post: Czech president: Gore Meltdown

Dragging us down to defeat

This rings true.

If ever there were a party that judges people by the color of their skin, not the content of their character, it is the Democrats. And this--- " multi-generational grief and trauma, and cultural and ethnic self-hate." They can't get over themselves. Jeffrey Lord, The American Spectator, cites numerous examples and concludes:
While it is understandably pushed under the rug at all those Jefferson-Jackson Day dinners, not to mention seemingly ignored altogether at party gatherings, the hard, inescapable fact of life for Democrats is that the Party's "childhood" or formative years was brutally traumatized by the support of slavery. Just as an individual child could be traumatized for life by growing up in a home where a pattern of alcoholism or drug addiction later created an adult incapable of maintaining healthy relationships, one looks at the seemingly instinctive if not unconscious reactions by Democrats -- almost any Democrat -- to any issue involving race and sees a very distinctive pattern.

They are stuck on race.
Impaired judgement. Moral myopia.
Because of this cumulative trauma, the party of race followed its support for subjugating millions of black Americans to slavery with support for a hundred years of segregation. After abandoning millions of people of color in their struggle against Communism, it now seeks to do the same as Iraqis struggle against Islamic fascists.
They hate America. And they would drag us all down to defeat with them.

The Right Side of History

Hirsi Ali Speaks Up

Ayaan Hirsi Ali came to town last night. The audience was mostly women, as her talk was sponsored by a women's group as part of the tour for her book, Infidel. We gathered in an old church turned meeting hall. Her bodyguards flanked the stage. She entered quietly and we stood and applauded.

She spoke with grace and dignity, with flashes of wit and spirit. The genesis of the book was a post-Sept. 11th debate in the Netherlands on Islam vs. the West, held about a year after the attack. She was appalled that 5 of the 6 speakers baldly accused America of being under the control of the Jews and responsible for much of the violence in the world, and portrayed Muslims as victims and Islam as the source of civilization and peace. Ayaan spoke up, and was immediately besieged with questions. She felt the tribal culture longing for a utopia based on the Koran had failed and needed to allow self-reflection. She described herself then as a liberal Muslim. Now she describes herself as a classical liberal.

A woman publisher approached her to write a book about her experiences, to "give us an insight into a world that is closed to us". The publisher gave her books to read written by feminists, but Ayaan "didn't want to write a self-help book based on my life, I thought that was pathetic". She didn't agree with the premise of multiculturalism that was being pushed on her---"cultures are not equal, individuals are"---equality before the law, respect for individuals and private property, that was what was important. All this anti-white male talk seemed wrong to her, as it was white males in America, "the Great Satan" who enshrined in law the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. She wrote her book for the 140 million women who have endured genital mutilation, to put a face on what was wrong with the culture she came from. After her talk, she graciously answered questions. I took her picture before she signed books.

Q. Had she read, While Europe Slept, and was the book accurate?
A. She had, and said it was, that the author had fled the US because fundamentalist people here wanted to deny him as a gay person the right to marry, but he realized that in Europe they wanted to kill him. As the book relates, there is a tendency toward anti-Americanism in Europe and appeasement of radical Islam, but she said more people are waking up.

Q.Why do Leftists ally themselves with jihadists?
A. They confuse faith with race. People on the Left fought for blacks, and present Islam as race, so those who criticize are called racists and Islamophobic, and they have grown up with multiculturalism which does not make judgements about culture, so they view all cultures as equal. She finds this very curious, to suggest that a culture which champions life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness should be viewed on the same level as a dogmatic culture incapable of self-reflection.

Q. How comfortable a home at a conservative think tank?
A. Very comfortable in the US. Democrats took her to AEI. AEI said they like to attract controversial scholars to advance debate, which she found very impressive, and they allow her the freedom to pursue her ideas.

Q. Why does Islam demand we convert? How do we prevent the practice in the US under Islam of beating women and treating them as inferior?
A. Need to make a distinction between Islam as a philosophy and Muslims. She does not believe Islam withstands the test of reason. It must reform. They demand rights! To beat women!! Europeans have taken the value of freedom very much for granted. They see the Muslims as the new Jews. They don't want to make the mistakes their fathers did in WWII, but the demands are all one-sided, intolerant, and take away individual freedom.

Q. Why does the press hide the truth during the cartoon riots and other riots, calling rioters immigrants and not Islamists?
A. Yes, this is very disturbing. But in The Netherlands, and even in France, the greatest appeaser, they republished the Danish cartoons. Yet they were NOT published in the UK and the US. There is an element of accommodation and fear in the US, with one difference---in Europe people look to the government for leadership---Americans seem to organize themselves to defend freedom of speech.

Q. Why don't we hear from American Muslims to renounce these acts of violence?
A. There are some, but so few we know them all by name: Irshad Manji, Wafa Sultan, Nonie Darwish, and Salman Rushdie in the UK. They are afraid if they speak up they will risk their lives and those of their families. She herself has bodyguards. That is the physical fear. The other is psychological---if you disagree with Allah, with the Koran, if you don't want to kill infidels, you risk hell. There must be a generally accepted move toward less literal interpretations of the Koran, but there is a large group of believers in jihad being paid by the Saudi government to spread jihad. (many US mosques are financed by this extreme Wahhabi sect). And if you as a moderate Muslim oppose this extreme view you are labeled infidel, Islamophobic, racist, and the argument is shut down, because some of these extremists as we know believe in using violence.

Q. (A woman got up and described herself as an American Muslim woman, a feminist and a professor. She made a rambling accusation about you people and your remarks condemning all Muslims and doesn't it bother you that you are harming the image of Islam, and that the West has had slavery and that she has suffered discrimination in this country as a Muslim, and Americans and Christians are Islamophobic.) A woman got up from the audience and said in response---they are not blowing up women and children!
A. Hirsi Ali said I would like to ask you---why doesn't it bother you that 140 million Muslim women have suffered genital mutilation, that many suffer honor killings, get little or no education and in some countries as many as 80% are raped (I think I heard that right). And if you want to protect the image of Islam, then the first step is to acknowledge what is wrong with Islam. Killing infidels, beheading cartoonists, while holding the Koran---not one Muslim stands up and says---this is not my faith! I am not making excuses for the West, but it is a culture of self-reflection.

Q. What next?
A. She is working on another book, a scholarly work. The prophet Mohammad wakes up in the NY Public Library and has a conversation with John Stuart Mill, Friedrich Hayek, and Colin Powell.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.


Previous Post: The Multiculti Trap

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Train Station at Dusk

Awful Reality of the 70's

In case you missed it, local economist Brian Wesbury with an excellent piece in the WSJ on our unsung economy. Key graf:
One would think that the unbelievably dramatic turnaround in the economy from the malaise of the 1970s to the boom of the past 24 years would prevent the return of big government. But it appears that a growing number of American politicians, journalists and their constituents have forgotten the awful reality of the 1970s economy. Part of the problem is that people younger than 45 don't have even the slightest idea of how bad it was, or what caused it. They also have no idea that when Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan turned away from socialism in the late 1970s and early 1980s, continental Europe (Germany, France and Italy) kept going. Then while the U.S and U.K. boomed, continental Europe fell behind.
I remember 1975 as a junior in college. There were very few jobs for the previous class. It was very glum. The Misery Index was climbing. When I graduated in 1976 I got one offer and I took it. This year my 30th reunion had a back to the 70's theme.

I didn't go.

Giuliani Warms Up

Looks like Giuliani needs to do some more research on global warming, before he officially gets in the race. Video at Pajamas Media, HT Bill Baar. But he scores on Gore.

Related posts: Czech president: Gore Meltdown, Is Rudy Right for America?

UPDATE. Transcript of Giuliani on Larry King. HT Tom Bevan, RCP blog. Excerpt:
GIULIANI: And maybe it's because I, you know, I ran a government and I tend to be a decisive person. I like decisions. And I think one of the things wrong with Washington is they don't want to make tough decisions anymore.

KING: You know, if you're...
GIULIANI: Non-binding resolution about Iraq; no decision on immigration; no decision on Social Security reform; no decision on what to do about energy independence; no decision. No decision.

You know why that happens?

Because it's unpopular.

KING: I've got to take a break.

I don't want to break your heart, but if you're president, you can't root for the Yankees.

GIULIANI: You've got to make decisions.

KING: You have to root for everybody.

Rudy Giuliani's our guest, the Republican candidate. He's running.
I like Rudy a lot. (Even tho I can't stand the Yankees.)

Redrawing Kenilworth

More proposed development along Green Bay Rd., this time in Kenilworth, based on their proposed comprehensive plan, developed by a Naperville consultant. Wilmette Life:
The draft plan suggests retaining some buildings on the Green Bay Road commercial corridor, and replacing or refitting most others. It recommends buildings up to five stories high, with all levels above the second floor set back to reduce the perception of height.

The upper floors would include some offices, but mostly residential units, to provide new stores with customers and give residents who wish to leave expensive single-family homes someplace less costly to go within the village.

The AH agenda is undoubtedly driving the height to 5 stories, going higher to spread out the cost of subsidizing AH units. A related story reveals the draft plan calls for the destruction of single family homes, presumably having an immediate impact on the resale value of those homes, and not for the better.

They are talking about doing a Wilmette on Green Bay Rd., with lanes dropping to one each way, with a turn:

The plan also discusses changes for Green Bay Road itself, including a landscaped median and features such as signature benches, bike racks and trash receptacles, and conversion of the road from a four-lane highway to a two-laner, with turn lanes at intersections.

Some of the road improvements would be undertaken by the Illinois Department of Transportation, which would pave and rebuild the road before turning it over to the village for future maintenance. Some other costs could be covered through a tax increment financing district plan, which would allow the village to skim off funds from commercial property taxes as they rise above current levels due to any redevelopment.

Kenilworth also has a train crossing similar to Wilmette's, so presumably IDOT will fool around with their lights like they've done with ours, making them staggered, fanning driver road rage and creating confusing crossings menacing to pedestrians. The other day I drove north on Green Bay at the evening rush hour. The southbound lane was backed up all the way from the Evanston border, through Wilmette and Kenilworth to north of Winnetka Ave. And traffic is typically backed up at least 2 blocks waiting for trains to pass through on the east-west arterial streets in Wilmette at least a couple of times a day.

And Kenilworth is talking TIF. We haven't heard that yet in Wilmette. As you know, that freezes the schools out, so they may get increased enrollment with no way to pay for it.

UPDATE: In other local news, Backfence Evanston has a crime map feature with pinpoints.

Cut Cook County Fat

A little revolt in the commissioners' ranks. Sun Times:

A dozen Cook County Board members Wednesday proposed whacking hundreds of high-paying political jobs in favor of more prosecutors, public defenders, nurses and police.

Their alternate budget came in response to County Board President Todd Stroger's budget plan, which would wipe out thousands of front-line jobs while preserving many higher-paying positions.

The Tribune editorialized yesterday that Stroger was cutting bone, not fat, and pointed out many of the management "sacred cows" left untouched were Dem precinct captains on the public payroll. Their story here today.

It's a good move if it can stick. Apparently one or two of the commissioners are having second thoughts. Why? You guessed it. Some of their relatives hold these management positions on the chopping block. Clueless.

The final vote on the $3 billion budget is next week.

Free the Cubs!


The Sun Times goes to bat for cursed Cubs' fans, putting the Tribune on Trial. I have to say, the Cubs have seemed more like a mascot of the Trib, good enough for corporate expense account fans, not a real team. But then I'm a Sox fan. Still, the Crosstown Classics would be a lot more fun with a more viable team. So sell the Cubs. We enjoy beating them in a fair fight. Free the Cubs!

Dead Souls Democrats

Young as I was, I remember when JFK was elected. My parents were very proud he was our first Irish Catholic president. And I remember when he died. I was in grade school. The nuns told us the president had been shot, and we knelt down on the floor beside our desks and prayed. That's the only time I ever remember doing that. Then we heard the church bell tolling and we knew he was dead.

Maybe I knew it then, maybe I read and heard some of what he had said when I was older. One phrase that sticks with me is of course, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country". The other is, "We will fight any foe, bear any burden in defense of freedom". Those are from memory. Here is the full quote, from Kennedy's inaugural address, at the height of the Cold War:
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans - born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage - and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
The address drew to a close with these words:
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shank from this responsibility - I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavour will light our country and all who serve it -- and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.
And so now we face a new world, a new threat. And are led in Congress now by Democrats. They offer resolutions to bleed our troops slowly. And they smile and smile.

They lean forward. Not to support our troops...but...grasping... ask what your country can do for you. Fighting for...power. They are the Dead Souls Democrats.

UPDATE: WaPo,via RCP has a story on the 11 Republican turncoats in the House joining in. Here's the list. Matthew Continetti, Weekly Standard, calls them the MoveOn Republicans. Shameful. Meanwhile the surge starts, "meeting little resistance" in Baghdad despite the AP headline, and that skunk Sadr has fled to Iran.


Previous posts: Old nag Dems, The McGoverning Dems

Palestinian Child Abuse

At LGF.

UPDATE: More child abuse. Polio spreading in Pakistan and elsewhere due to fears of "an American plot to sterilize innocent Muslin children". At Marathon Pundit. These children are being robbed of their childhoods, and now of their lives, one way or another.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Hirsi Ali in Winnetka

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Infidel, will be speaking in Winnetka tomorrow night. Sponsored by The Women's Exchange.

Thursday, Feb. 15th


7:00pm. Author and Activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali. No charge, but reservations required at 847-441-3406 or by email judi@womens-exchange.org


Related post: The Multiculti Trap.

A Cold Day in Euro-hell

"One Cold War was quite enough."

Defense Sec. Gates in response to Putin's outburst. Article by Peter Brookes, RCP. And this:
But the SecDef also exposed some glaring Russian hypocrisy: "We wonder, too, about some Russian policies that seem to work against international stability, such as its arms transfers and its temptation to use energy resources for political coercion."
Do the anti-American Eurobrat elites with all their anti-hyperpower talk really want another Cold War? Russia's one of their main energy suppliers. Do they really want a resurgent Russia allied with Syria and Iran, supplying them with weapons and nuclear materials? Who will provide Europe's nuclear umbrella then?

France?

It may be a cold day in Euro-hell. Before we rush to help Europe again. Tant pis.

Related post: Focus of Hate

Dowd's Delicious Dish

Have been doing a bit of shoveling today, so not so much blogging, but if you haven't read Maureen Dowd yet on Obama, it's as delicious as anything dished out during the Clinton years. She's good on celebrity-politicos. Here's one snippet:
He was eloquent, if not as inspiring as his advance billing had prepared audiences to expect. He made his first Swift-boat-able slip when he had to apologize for talking about soldiers’ lives “wasted” in Iraq. He sounded self-consciously pristine at times, as if he was too refined for the muck of politics. That’s not how you beat anybody but Alan Keyes.
And this:
Using the dreaded third person that some candidates slip into, he told the press that one of their favorite narratives boiled down to “Obama has pretty good style, he can deliver a pretty good speech, but he seems to prioritize rhetoric over substance.” After an ode to his own specificity, he tut-tutted, “You’ve been reporting on how I look in a swimsuit.”

He poses for the cover of Men’s Vogue and then gets huffy when people don’t treat him as Hannah Arendt.

Guess I'll have to put her back on my reading list until the Dem primaries are over.

Previous post: Barackometer.

UPDATE: The Obama Men's Vogue currently for sale at ebay for $20. Autographed copy goes for $225. One of his fans is cashing in now. Hmm.

Focus of Hate

Vice President Cheney is heading Down Under, so expect the predictable protests you will find anywhere in the world---the politics of envy, the focus of hate among the haters, no matter what we do. Janet Albrechtsen, The Australian, RCP, "Protector of the free world deserves better":

Anti-Americanism has less to do with US politics and policies and more to do with what Markovits calls the "perfectly respectable human need to hate the big guy". Half a century ago, Hannah Arendt commented on the same psychology of mistrust aimed at the US. It was, she said, the inevitable plight of the big, rich guy to be alternately flattered and abused, remaining unpopular no matter how generous they were.

And so Norwegian Nobel laureate Knut Hamsun hated the US for being too big and too fast. Anti-Americanism has morphed into a desire to bring America to heel, something that coincides with the goal of Islamists. But if the big, fast rich guy retreats, it's worth asking who will step up to the plate when the West needs things fixed. The dawdling burghers of Europe may recall that small and slow did not help the Kuwaitis, Bosnian Muslims, Kosovars, Afghanis or the tsunami victims.

It illustrates the further decline of Europe, that they must blame others for their own shortcomings. The Marshall Plan gave them a boost, but since their fullscale embrace of socialism in the 70's they have fallen way behind, and join the Islamists in their irrational hate. And it is no coincidence that such clear-eyed commentary comes from Australia, a country that has historically been one of our strongest allies. They are naturally isolated, and so understand better than most the importance of valuing their friends.

Is It Love?


Giving a whole new meaning to Patsy Kline's "Crazy", scientists say love is akin to insanity. The "chemical storm that romantic love can trigger in our brains" is powerful stuff. WSJ, "Is it Love or Mental Illness?":
Using brain scans to study emotional changes is still a new science. But the images signal the potential toll of relationship problems. "It's not a good combination," notes Dr. Fisher. "You're feeling intense romantic love, you're willing to take big risks, you're in physical pain, obsessively thinking about a person and you're struggling to control your rage. You're not operating with your full range of cognitive abilities. It's possible that part of the rational mind shuts down."
My husband pointed this story out to me. I expect some chocolate to soothe my mind. There's more:
The lesson is that sharing new experiences with your spouse appears to trigger changes in the brain that mimic the early days of being in love.
Maybe a trip somewhere warm? It's for my health.

Happy Valentine's Day!

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Iraqi MP: God Bless America

MEMRI TV, via HotAir. A brave cleric speaks up and thanks America for bringing freedom to Iraq.


UPDATE: Related news on a radical cleric, a supporter of Hezbollah, who gave the invocation at the recent DNC retreat. Powerline points out the Dhimmicratic press has not covered this.

Barackometer

Al Sharpton opens his mouth again on Obama, and SNL introduces their Obama shtick. At HotAir.

Previous posts: Just Say I'm Sorry, The Big O

Romney Runs

It's official. Mitt is in. The former governor of Massachusetts announces at the Henry Ford Museum in Michigan, where his dad was governor. Story here, Video here. Via RCP. He says he's a real world, experienced guy with executive experience who can transform Washington.

I like those electric cobalt blue signs.

More from MyManMitt. Official site here.

Edwards' Loses Backyard Vote

A friend with North Carolina connections writes me that Rudy Giuliani's appeal is widespread. One of Rudy's early and vocal fans is a neighbor of John Edwards and Edwards' Own Piece of America. Pix and commentary originally at TigerHawk. And no, this neighbor isn't of Edwards' ilk of hypocritical conspicuous consumption. He's a turnip farmer.

Related posts: Metro Republicans, Is Rudy Right for America?

UPDATE: In related news, Edwards has finally fired his foul-mouthed feminazi, anti-Christian "official" blogger. At Hugh Hewitt.

Trib gets it wrong

Can we please drive a stake through the heart of the assertion that Saddam Hussein didn't seek yellowcake in Niger? He did. The Bush administration was trying to get the TRUTH out. Apparently that is a crime in the Alice in Wonderland world of the MSM. And this from an earlier post:
The Tribune story goes on to summarize the Senate report which dismisses the the intel on Iraq trying to buy yellowcake in Niger as "apparently fabricated" and that a connection between Iraq and Niger "did not exist". But this intel has been corroborated (see pages 6 and 7 of Podhoretz) by the bipartisan 9/11 commission, and Joe Wilson has been discredited in this and in his accusations that the Bush White House attempted to smear him and out his CIA wife. Even the Washington Post has concluded that Wilson himself is the one most reponsible for outing his wife, and one of their veteran political observers stated Karl Rove is owed an apology. As for the connection between Iraq and Niger, what was Saddam Hussein's top nuclear diplomat doing there?

Having tea? About the only marketable commodity in Niger is uranium, all you have to do is go to Wikepedia for that answer.
Joe Wilson is a liar, a Kerry operative, and Patrick Fitzgerald has reprehensibly engaged in very selective prosecution. And as far as selectively revealing information, I seem to recall the "crude political reasons" behind the NY Times' release of classified information that our intel was using the SWIFT network to track and capture terrorists. (And note to Sun Times, the Dems and their allies in the press who leak classified information for political gain are themselves in part responsible for hampering our intelligence-gathering capabilities and damaging our national security.) The Trib backed the NY Times on that one. The Tribune gets it wrong.

Yes to Single Sex Education

The gender gap continues, as boys in our feminized schools fall further behind, across racial groups, income levels, urban and suburban, across the country. Michelle Easton, Sun Times:

The solution isn't to feminize little boys or medicate them into compliance, but to create learning environments that respect who they are and what they bring to society. One obvious way to do that is through single-sex education where instruction can be more effectively tailored to the learning styles and motivations of each gender.

Until recently, single-sex education was only available in private schools, but it could become widespread within the public school system if local school authorities take advantage of new U.S. Education Department regulations adopted last year.

Closing this gap is important not only for the boys, but for the formation of families, the bedrock of a healthy society. Parents need more choice to help their sons learn as well as their daughters.

Easton is president of the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute. Added to my blogroll.


Previous posts:Core (In)Competencies, Open the Schoolhouse Doors, Gender Gap in Suburban Schools, We Are Failing Our Boys

Just Say I'm Sorry

Another non-apology apology, this time from Sen. Obama, on his "gaffe":
By Monday, reporters covering Obama making his first visit as a presidential candidate in New Hampshire, asked Obama, campaigning in a Nashua home, if military families deserved an apology. "Well as I said, it is not at all what I intended to say, and I would absolutely apologize if any of them felt that in some ways it had diminished the enormous courage and sacrifice that they'd shown.
The man who aspires to be president, according to Lynn Sweet "assailed the 'trivialization of politics' where 'it is all about who makes a gaffe." Please. A simple sorry would be best. Got the guts for that?


UPDATE: NY Post via RCP on Obama insulting one of America's oldest allies. And the Rothenberg Report on Obama's tendency to vote "present" in Illinois, rather than take a stand. Here's one example:
In 1999, Obama voted "present" on SB 759, a bill that required mandatory adult prosecution for firing a gun on or near school grounds. The bill passed the state Senate 52-1. Also in 1999, Obama voted "present" on HB 854 that protected the privacy of sex-abuse victims by allowing petitions to have the trial records sealed. He was the only member to not support the bill.
There are more.

UPDATE: Just so you recall, here are a few issues Obama did take a stand on.Tribune:
He voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive. He supported allowing retired police officers to carry concealed weapons, but opposed allowing people to use banned handguns to defend against intruders in their homes.

Brady on North Shore

State Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington) spoke at our area Lincoln Day lunch on Sunday, had just been in McHenry County, and was headed for more venues around the state yesterday. Sen. Brady said Illinois is 8th worst among the states in job creation, losing out to neighboring states, and given our natural assets and infrastructure we should be among the top performers. We have lost roughly 500,000 jobs due to higher taxes and fees, robbing our young people of opportunities. Meanwhile the governor introduces new programs without paying for existing ones, going further into debt. Estimates are Illinois debt is approaching $100 billion.

Senator Brady also subscribes to Lincoln's philosophy that government does best when it does only for people what they cannot do for themselves.

(Pix with Evanston Republican Committeeman Linda LaFianza)

Designer Dirt

The NY Times on the latest in "natural building". These devotees are so refined they are beyond mundane considerations of saving energy, though let it be noted they are on the fringe:
They are part of a small movement interested in “natural building” on the fringes of green architecture. But they consider green architecture to be overly focused on energy efficiency, while they are concerned with the eco-friendliness of the entire process. The idea, according to Lloyd Kahn, a former shelter editor of the Whole Earth Catalog, is to use “materials that have as little processing as possible, like dirt, straw and bamboo.”
The Times feels compelled to instruct its readers:
It is hardly a new or chic movement: millions of poor people around the globe use natural materials like dirt for their homes whether they want to or not. But with the growing environmental awareness in this country, Mr. Kahn said, there is greater interest in natural building materials like dirt.
Imagine that. Right now it remains a Left Coast phenom, as "the East Coast tends to be much more conservative". Well that is news.

And the dirt is dirt cheap. But I'm sure some enterprising soul will come up with some designer dirt. Maybe someone from flyover country.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Obama Begins

Does he begin as he means to go on? He calls the lives of our troops who have died wasted. He wants to be our president? Video.


Previous post here.

Sharia Couture

How sick is this. Link via Drudge

Sharia couture in London.

The gagged Maleficent look.



This is the previous one.

What are they thinking?

UPDATE: Meanwhile, also in London, the trial of the failed British bombers goes on. Video at LGF.

Old nag Dems

Making the point once again on Iraq, because it bears repeating. You break it now Dems, you own it. Well done here in an OpEd piece on the pages of the NY Times (who better to benefit from these words), "Why are the Pacifists So Passive?":
A failed state in Iraq would breed more terrorism, not less, by becoming a haven for more radical training camps.

Most in Congress, in fact, are not eager to replay Vietnam. The United States has had far fewer casualties in this conflict. Our national security interests here are high. If we falter now, it would be read as a “defeat” and embolden more terrorist attacks on us. Once again the world would begin to doubt American strength. This would undermine our ability to conduct credible diplomacy, while electrifying Islamists to further jihad.

The truth is that the Democrats in Congress would rather sit back and let the president take the heat in war than do anything risky. That way they get to prepare for the next election while pointing fingers of blame and spinning conspiracy theories. It is odd to see the Democratic Party turning toward isolationism, bonding with paleoconservatives, and so bitterly averse to the ideals of democratic nation building.

The Democrats have no claim to the moral high ground here. Those bitter old men and aging feminists, self-absorbed and blinkered. Old nags plodding along the old blame America first track. The jihadists are much better at it.

Keep an eye on Dem Senate

A section of the Legislative Transparency bill in the Senate was narrowly defeated. It would have required bloggers, among others, to register as lobbyists if they engaged in efforts to reach more than 500 people to encourage them to contact their elected officials. So say you put your blog article in a newsletter and paid to send it out, like many grassroots groups do. Former journalist and now blogger, Sara Pentz. Read the whole post, but this excerpt is key:
In effect, the red tape bureaucracy of 220 would have ‘blocked’ my freedom of speech.

A separate report would have been required for each policy issue that I wrote about or advocated. If I failed to complete each of the required actions of 220, I would have suffered severe civil and potentially criminal penalties. That is, if I failed to register, report or omitted some required information in my reports, I might be jailed.

The Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007, S. 1, 220, section (17) would have been a silent threat that would hang over my head like the sword of Damocles.

The purpose of 220 (17) was not to make sure that I did not pay any government official some amount of money to sway his thinking or vote. It was, instead, clearly written to stop anyone––from any end of the political spectrum––from swaying (meaning disagreeing) a government official or anyone who had the power to write or shape the laws of the land.

[snip]
In fact, 220 was finally ‘defeated’ at the last minute when an amendment to S. 1 removed the controversial section from the bill.
As the friend who sent this to me remarked, I thought only Bush/Ashcroft censored Americans? From this blog, Lighthouse Patriot, comes word that Republican Senators Bennett and McConnell acted to amend the bill to strike this out.

Everyone is getting richer

Fast facts for us capitalists to counter Dem class-warfare misrepresentations on the state of the middle class. Nick Gillespie, Reason, RCP:
But everyone is getting richer. In real dollars, every quintile has posted significant annual increases over the past 35 years, ranging from $3,000 for the lowest quintile to $13,000 for the middle quintile to over $25,000 for next-to-highest one. And the individuals in those quintiles change all the time, something even The New York Times, which wrings its hands on class matters like an obsessive-compulsive, admits. Urban Institute economists Daniel P. McMurrer and Isabel V. Sawhill estimate that between 25 percent to 40 percent of individuals switch quintiles in a given year and that "rates of mobility have not changed over time." Research tracking individuals in the lowest income quintile in 1968 found that 23 years later, 53 percent were in a higher quintile and that half had spent at least a year in the top income quintile.

More important, basic indicators of wealth and opportunity drive home the reality that the middle class' place at the table is pretty secure--maybe not the best seat in the house, but arguably better than ever. A historically high 70 percent of Americans own their homes (see table 956). And two-thirds of high school graduates go on to college (up from half in 1970) [see table 265]. That wouldn't be happening if the U.S. was fast turning into the Brazil of the North.

Also National Review in their Feb. 12th issue presented an excerpt of analysis arguing current government reports do not adjust for family size, making it look like the rich are getting richer. In fact, consumption rates are highest among the lowest quintile of income. And "family units with higher incomes are more likely to include children". Here's the summary and link to the full paper:

We develop an alternative that relies on data from the National Income and Product Accounts. Our data reveal that real median incomes have been increasing in the recent period, albeit at a slower rate than the long-term average. Using the same methodology for consumption, we find that consumption for all income groups, including the middle, has been growing robustly in recent times. This is in contrast to statistics reported by the Consumer Expenditure Survey, the most often cited data for all consumption analysis, which show middle class consumption declining.
So---robust consumption and upward mobility. Two Americas is a myth. And the "rich" are often families with children, who the liberals rely on as potential slaves to social security.

Czech president: Gore Meltdown

Czech president Vaclav Klaus, doubtless clued in to the perils of groupthink by his familiarity with the old Soviet system, speaks out on the politics of global warming and says it's " obvious environmentalism is a new incarnation of modern leftism". Klaus is incredulous at the "undignified slapstick" of treating this summary report by politicized scientists as the final word on global warming when the full report does not come out until May. And there's this exchange:
Q: Don't you believe that we're ruining our planet?• A: I will pretend that I haven't heard you. Perhaps only Mr Al Gore may be saying something along these lines: a sane person can't. I don't see any ruining of the planet, I have never seen it, and I don't think that a reasonable and serious person could say such a thing. Look: you represent the economic media so I expect a certain economical erudition from you. My book will answer these questions. For example, we know that there exists a huge correlation between the care we give to the environment on one side and the wealth and technological prowess on the other side. It's clear that the poorer the society is, the more brutally it behaves with respect to Nature, and vice versa.• It's also true that there exist social systems that are damaging Nature - by eliminating private ownership and similar things - much more than the freer societies. These tendencies become important in the long run.
Translation of an interview with a Czech financial publication by Harvard professor Lubos Motl. At Drudge.

Mark Steyn with more enviro-skepticism. (This column also appeared in the Sun Times.) Also good editorial, NY Sun, via RCP.


Previous posts: Not Melting, Misleading Information, Not So Fast, The Cosmic Ray Theory

Cook County Hemorhagging

Tribune headline yesterday, "Why Cook hospitals are losing millions"---workers are not even asking people whether they have insurance, and just leaving this money on the table, even as Cook County is struggling with a huge deficit--half a billion dollars. And even if they do bill, paperwork is completed so poorly 39% of Medicaid bills are rejected. In one county clinic, 25% of the encounter forms doctors filled out were over a year old, in not a pile but a wall of boxes, and ineligible for reimbursement. And that stat is from 5 years ago.

Wouldn't it be better to just outsource at least the administrative operations? But of course, those patronage jobs would go by the wayside. Oh, apparently the county has hired 3 consultants and is planning to hire more. Sounds like a bandaid. Maybe they are more relatives of Todd.

Today Dennis Byrne in his column reminds us that Cook County is providing "free" health care for the collar counties as well.

And all of this has human costs.

Hemoragging dollars and providing poor care as well.

The Big O


You may have thought he was running for President of the United States. Barack Obama's running for President of Earth. Lynn Sweet, Chicago Sun Times, on hand Saturday in Springfield for his histrionic, uh historic announcement (along with media acolytes Chris Matthews and Howard Fineman) presaged his path in her column on his visit to yet another Continent, a mere prelude to his ultimate plans. He ended his speech calling for a "new birth of freedom on this earth!!!" And then he said "I love you!!!!"

Lynn Sweet after the speech says Obama is a "global narrative", a "story greater than himself".

Yes, the Big O is the Promise of the Planet.

No, Obama thankfully didn't use the word "planet", but Howard Fineman did---the "echo of Lincoln is global", his speech will have "very profound" impact on the "planet".

And Obama talked about the challenge of the millennium. Those
better angels of our nature weren't chorusing Hosanna stuck in this century, it was O-bama for the millennium.

It's "destiny", a call to rise above the "smallness of our politics". I guess Hillary is pretty short.

Yes, Obama's got the big picture. He's tall like Lincoln.

He comes as the candidate from corrupt Cook County, the favorite son of the Illinois business as usual machine. He's above all that. He just likes to get along.

Obama, man of destiny says "this campaign can't only be about ME. (emphasis not really just mine) It must be about us. It must be about what we can all do together." Why can't we all be liberals like him? Why can't we all just get along? You know, make a difference. Light candles. Strum a few chords together. Smoke the peace pipe. Turn a blind eye.

No worries, he majored in international relations.

You notice, though, his campaign colors are a little off. A shade pastel. He has some difficulty in holding high the true colors of our flag. He falls short in understanding the tough fight for freedom in the world, and America's special role as guardian, America's sacred trust as a beacon of hope.

Obama with his facile words undercuts our troops in Iraq and demeans our honorable effort there to usher in democracy. Already, he's showing his ignorance. He's always looking for a better war to fight, but never finding a cause worth fighting for.

But when Abraham Lincoln ran for election and the country faced civil war over the greatest injustice of the time, in his House Divided speech, given in Springfield, Illinois, he didn't urge that we turn our backs, he engaged:
Our cause, then, must be intrusted to, and conducted by, its own undoubted friends-those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in the work-who do care for the result. Two years ago the Republicans of the nation mustered over thirteen hundred thousand strong. We did this under the single impulse of resistance to a common danger, with every external circumstance against us. Of strange, discordant, and even hostile elements, we gathered from the four winds, and formed and fought the battle through, under the constant hot fire of a disciplined, proud,and pampered enemy. Did we brave all them to falter now?-now, when that same enemy is wavering,dissevered, and belligerent? The result is not doubtful. We shall not fail-if we stand firm, we shall not fail.
They called him Honest Abe, and we remember him today. Lincoln lost that election for the Senate, but persevered and ultimately prevailed as President. He chose to fight the battle against slavery and preserved the Union.

At the recent Democrat "Retreat" candidate Obama got up on stage and said, NY Times:
“There are those who don’t believe in talking about hope: they say, well, we want specifics, we want details, we want white papers, we want plans,” he said then. “We’ve had a lot of plans, Democrats. What we’ve had is a shortage of hope.”

But some Democrats were scornful. “That’s nonsense,” Mr. Hart said. “It posits that it’s either-or. Who’s saying you can’t talk about hope? I’m not talking about white papers: I’m talking about one big speech about ‘How I view the world.’ ”

There are those who ask why, there are those who ask why not... there are those who just are.

Obama offers a great hot air balloon of hOpe.

But as his other rival Edwards says "I haven't seen a plan from him. Have you all?"

The answer so far is nOpe.

...pop?


Previous post: Bored of Barack

UPDATE: Obama whines about the press. Protesting too much. He loves the MSM. They are his base.

UPDATE: Tom Bevan, RCP blog, "Obama: Lincoln in 1860 or Dean in 2004?"

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Punk Putin

Reaction to WaPo story on Putin accusing the US of fomenting world instability. At RedState:
Sometimes words fail. Like when the kleptocratic leader of a third rate military power and economic basket case who endorses extortion as an element of domestic policy and sells weapons to pretty much anyone with a Visa or Mastercard accuses others of injuring the international system.
Punk Putin. From bad to worse.


Previous posts: Nuke-grade Uranium for Sale, Energy Answers, Vlad the Murderer, (and my favorite) He Didn't Go to Baghdad to Drink Coffee

Metro Republicans

Noemie Emery, The Weekly Standard, RCP looks at the 2008 race and "The Rise of the Metro Republicans". Well, I guess here we are in metro country. This little outpost of red may spread.

I especially like this bit:
Giuliani is not only pro-choice, but also anti-gun and gay-friendly, an urban cowboy who marches in gay rights parades (just like a Democrat), and appears in drag at a correspondents' assembly, though looking less like the plausible Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie than like Tony Curtis in Some Like It Hot. This should count him out in the South, and with social conservatives--but so far, at least, it has not. How come? Because they admire him despite his stance on those litmus-test issues. Indeed, they see him in some key respects as a fellow social conservative who brought law and order to a city in crisis, the head-banging crime fighter who bonded with cops, flushed the porn shops out of Times Square, and protested loudly when a dung-draped Madonna was shown at the expense of the public at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. He has endeared himself to conservatives everywhere by taking on, and often defeating, the New York Times and the American Civil Liberties Union. He is the enemy and the antithesis of the therapy culture that is at the core of the modern liberal project, the foe of relativism and friend of retribution and punishment, when it is called for. The word evil doers would not seem strange on his lips.
Yeah. Read it all. Send those liberals to their couches. Maybe play a little Tony Bennett as PsyOps.


Related post: Is Rudy Right for America?

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Frozen Harbor

Wrestling the Issue

Arnold is real, and has some honest things to say here wrestling (sorry, just slipped out) with the issue of immigration. He is, after all, an immigrant himself. These are thoughts that occur to any common sense and decent person, even if they are in favor of a comprehensive plan to solve the problem. The tapes leaked out, so read them in the full context. Tom Bevan, RCP.

Women Opt Out

Well, I know what I do with my mornings......surf the net and blog. What are other women doing? Not watching morning TV any more. Via Instapundit:
"Watching morning television for me is the equivalent of reading People magazine in the dentist's office," said Lauck, who writes for websites from her home in Santa Rosa, Calif. "They don't have anything new or particularly relevant to my life. It seems like a lot of fluff. I feel like I can get information faster and cleaner on the Internet."

Lauck's not alone in souring on network news programs. In particular, this season has seen a significant erosion of the morning shows' demographic sweet spot: 25- to 54-year-old women.

Just made that demographic. Sorry MSM.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Not Melting


Welcome back John Tierney !!!, the only writer I could stomach at the NY Times. Previously an Op-Ed columnist, now writing for its Science Times. Via Instapundit, the subject is "Greenland's Glaciers Take a Breather" (uh, it's not melting.) And since the pix is courtesy of NASA, and it is beautiful, I will reproduce it here.

(Little snow in Chicago, but very cold.)
Previous post: Misleading Information.

Amenities International

Response to hateful, anti-military WaPo blogger William Arkin, who sneered at our troops' "obscene amenities". At Michelle Malkin.

Bless our troops.

UPDATE: Good stuff, going on offense after Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Sickening

This is sick. Jules Crittendon and LGF.

Durbin the Ditz

Our Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin has done it again. I'll call this one Durbin the Ditz. Video at Powerline. Hat tip Dump Dick Durbin.



(Pix of Durbin with other Dark Age Democrats, Rahm and my Congressperson Jan Schakowsky)

Previous posts: Isn't That Special, Durbin Flips on Earmarks, Durbin Feeds at the Trough, Durbin the Dull,Dark Age Democrats II

Phoned in Pork

The next iteration, earmark requests by Congress phoned in to federal agencies. Kimberley Strassel, WSJ, RCP:
Congressional members, led by appropriators and an army of staff, have already figured out a new way to keep their favors in the money, and it might as well be called 1-800-EARMARKS (which unfortunately is already taken). All across Washington, members are at this moment phoning budget officers at federal agencies--Interior, Defense, HUD, you name it--privately demanding that earmarks in previous legislation be fully renewed again this year. There might not be a single official earmark in the 2007 spending bill, but thousands are in the works all the same.
Some agencies are resisting, others welcoming. OMB has issued earmark requirements, but perhaps the Bush administration needs to shame those porky politicos.

Bored of Barack

Call me bored of Barack already. Obama will be officially announcing in Springfield tomorrow. The WaPo and national media (hat tip Reverse Spin) are in a swivet, tho the Sun Times is more grounded here. The Tribune has a jaundiced story on various presidential announcements, with a guide to the local horseshoe sandwich and other delicacies for the national press.

As far as I am concerned, he has jumped the shark. Hillary will swallow him whole.

At least when she compared herself to Lincoln she had the NY Times do it for her.


Previous posts: Obama Secular Leftist, Obama, Behind the Curve?, Obama, The "Thinker", Obama: Man of the People Magazine

UPDATE: Well, yeah. Tucker Carlson, "It's hard to call that Christianity".

Is Rudy Right for America?

I've always been a social conservative, even when I was a Democrat in my young and foolish youth, but I've never been a single issue voter. To me the overriding priority of the federal government is to provide for our national security. And the number one domestic issue for me is keeping taxes low to grow the economy and provide jobs for families to provide for themselves.

There are a number of Republican candidates who claim the social conservative mantle in this race. But Sen. Brownback I consider soft on national security. Gov. Huckabee will probably go nowhere as the governor of a small state. Gov. Romney has evolved toward social conservative positions and has firmly put himself in that camp for this election. And Sen. John McCain has a consistent social conservative record, but never seems comfortable talking about it or espousing it. Both Romney and McCain support the surge. Sen. McCain has been a real statesman in making the case to win the war. (And if there is competition on who is the best supply-sider that is all to the good.)

Since the appointments of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito the urgency emanating from social conservatives has eased. At least it has for me. In recent interviews Giuliani indicated he was open to appointing strict constructionists. And despite his pro-choice record he is opposed to partial birth abortion, except to save the life of the mother, and will continue to limit Medicaid funding of abortion. Giuliani is in favor of school choice. He wasn't when he started out as mayor, but he came to see it was the best way to reform the schools. He says people may not agree with him on everything, but you've got to live with that, if your views change you've got to be honest with people, you've got to be yourself---you have strong views, but you have to learn from experience. He is open to states having different solutions on different issues. Hannity interview here and here.

And with the Democrat efforts to appeal this next election cycle to social conservative social engineers---on the environment, for the common good, (See Tom Bevan) Republicans need to appeal to an electorate that values altruism as best expressed in the private sector. (See the Lemonade Stand Approach) The ownership society and accompanying low taxes give more scope for charitable giving for those compassionate conservatives. At least Republicans have put corruption as an issue behind them---their corrupt congressmen lost in the last election, unlike Democrats who have lingering problems---Harry Reid, William Jefferson. And there's been some bipartisan porkbusting, at least on transparency of earmarks.

The Chicago Tribune has tried to undermine Guiliani's appeal to independent, inner suburban voters in a detailed but ultimately unpersuasive piece. Apparently he is guilty of engaging in capitalism. (I didn't even save it, after reading it. And yes, I did read all FOUR pages.) Richard Baehr, The American Thinker, RCP, calls it a pre-emptive strike by the Tribune to clear the field for Hillary and Barack, the Illinois favorites and go after the GOP favorite:
He offers the chance for the GOP to win back some of the libertarians, independents, and moderate voters who have defected in recent elections, but were once part of Ronald Reagan's large majority, since they were with him on his economic policies and his Cold War policies, if not on all his social stances.
I think that analysis is about right. Republicans lost the swing voters on the War in Iraq, but Rudy might well win them back for the War on Terror. He has that win one for the Gipper appeal, after fighting back for New York on 9/11. Here's a ringing endorsement from those who have seen him up close at City Journal:
But in a GOP presidential field in which cultural and religious conservatives may find something to object to in every candidate who could really get nominated (and, more important, elected), Giuliani may be the most conservative candidate on a wide range of issues. Far from being a liberal, he ran New York with a conservative’s priorities: government exists above all to keep people safe in their homes and in the streets, he said, not to redistribute income, run a welfare state, or perform social engineering. The private economy, not government, creates opportunity, he argued; government should just deliver basic services well and then get out of the private sector’s way. He denied that cities and their citizens were victims of vast forces outside their control, and he urged New Yorkers to take personal responsibility for their lives. “Over the last century, millions of people from all over the world have come to New York City,” Giuliani once observed. “They didn’t come here to be taken care of and to be dependent on city government. They came here for the freedom to take care of themselves.” It was that spirit of opportunity and can-do-ism that Giuliani tried to re-instill in New York and that he himself exemplified not only in the hours and weeks after 9/11 but in his heroic and successful effort to bring a dying city back to life.

And this:
To those of us who observed Giuliani from the beginning, it was astonishing how fully he followed through on his conservative principles once elected, no matter how much he upset elite opinion, no matter how often radical advocates took to the streets in protest, no matter how many veiled (and not so veiled) threats that incendiary figures like Al Sharpton made against him, and no matter how often the New York Times fulminated against his policies. In particular, offended by the notion that people should be treated differently and demand privileges based on the color of their skin, Giuliani was fearless in confronting racial extortionists like Sharpton. Early in his tenure, he startled the city when he refused to meet with Sharpton and other black activists after a confrontation between police and black Muslims at a Harlem mosque. And though activists claimed that Giuliani inflamed racial tensions with such actions, there were no incidents during his tenure comparable with the disgraceful Crown Heights riot under Dinkins, in which the police let blacks terrorize Orthodox Jews for several days in a Brooklyn neighborhood.
And I remember when he turned down a Saudi prince's blood money after 9/11. His first priority in New York was to restore public safety, and I imagine he'll set national security and fighting the war on terror as a high priority as well. Here's R. Emmett Tyrrell, the American Spectator, NY Sun, "Not Since T.R.":
Then came September 11 and he displayed to the nation the traits he had so successfully displayed in reviving his city. He was decisive, efficient, prudent, and — something only those at his side in Gracie Mansion already knew — brave. After the first plane struck the World Trade Center, he instantly rushed to the scene. Arriving just after the second plane hit he re-established governance nearby as the towers came down. He was in genuine peril but coolly oversaw the rescue work and communication with the outside world.

He had already demonstrated his awareness of the danger and nihilism of terrorists. In 1995 he expelled Palestine Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat from commemorations of the United Nations' 50th anniversary sponsored by the city, saying, "When we're having a party and a celebration, I would rather not have someone who has been implicated in the murders of Americans there." Mr. Giuliani's knowledge of international terrorism has steadily grown to the point that he is now acknowledged as one of the world's foremost authorities on terror. That alone in these times should commend him to the majority of the American electorate.
Rudy Giuliani has an abundance of common sense and lots of guts. He's an instinctive conservative. And that's good enough for me to consider giving him my vote.

Related posts: Choosing Up 2008, Sunny Conservatives, Giuliani vs. McCain, Does Hillary Measure Up?

UPDATE: Peggy Noonan on Rudy and Hillary (the limousine liberal). Tom Bevan looks at historic poll numbers on Rudy.

Why I Turned Right

Maybe it's the cold weather, but I have been reading a lot lately. Why I Turned Right is out, a collection of essays from notable Boomer conservatives.

Haven't read it yet, but will, since I started out on the Left as well, or maybe I just thought I was a leftist. Good take by Charlotte Hays at IWF, with this quote from Dr. Sally Satel:
"My Hill experience gave me a startling insight: Liberals and conservatives seemed to have mirror-image approaches to paternalism. Liberals made intrusive laws for the competent while conservatives preferred to rely on individuals to make their own decisions. Conversely, conservatives preferred intrusive laws for the incompetent to whom liberals applied a hands-off policy. Liberals were comfortable with public health paternalism: intrusive nonsmoking laws, taxes on unhealthy products, strict risk-averse EPA and FDA regulations. . . .Yet, when a person was incoherent, defecating in the streets, or freezing a limb off in the part, then -- and only then -- did the principles of autonomy apply."
Compassion turned on its head.

This book sounds like a cautionary tale for Democrats, who I imagine now that they are in power in Congress again will turn more than a few people off from their politics.


Related posts: The McGoverning Dems, Another Extremist Ideologue, Talk Left, Act Right

A Fruitless Effort

Tribune story this morning "2 suburbs move on affordable housing". The "affordable housing" law targeting 49 affluent Illinois communities is another illustration of the symbolism over substance of the Blagojevich administration---showy but no way to pay for it.

Formerly known as the Builder's Appeal Act, it was pushed through under the radar by Rep. Julie Hamos and State Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, among others, to further the interests of their friends, those profitable non-profits. Not to mention some other prominent real estate donors to the Democrat party and their proteges at IHDA. These stellar public servants held hearings in Chicago and around the state, but not in their own district, among the communities most affected.

So, as the Tribune story suggests, unless communities assert home rule, or fight it is as unconstitutional, they may be forced to squander millions on high priced land in order to prop up a few old homes or condos to award to a select few. Glencoe's average home price is $1 million, Wilmette's about $750,000. The state defines AH as selling for $125,000 or less. You do the math on the gap. Even Wilmette's Mallinckrodt senior condos don't qualify. Their supposed AH condos, essentially subsidized by other condo buyers, cost just under $200,000. The other units start in the $300,000s and go up to $1 million.

And unless they find a George Soros or his ilk to swan into the community, it may be financed by raising taxes on senior citizens and their retirement nest eggs through teardown taxes. Since this scheme is a money pit, I anticipate more taxes will be forthcoming, as Highland Park has done, making it more expensive for young families and single moms to live in Wilmette. The middle will be forced out, exacerbating income divides. A new second-class citizenry will be created, as the law will lock them out of realizing the financial gains of owning their own home, and passing them on to their children. They will be denied the American Dream by the same government that purports to help.

Supposedly this affordable housing will go to local government employees who wish to live in town. Aside from the fact that company town