Thursday, May 31, 2007

Syria in the Hot Seat

Exposing Syrian false "stability" and the now state-sponsored Al Qaeda terrorists the Democrats want to "talk" to. Nancy Pelosi sure "made a difference" there---Give terror a chance! Gateway Pundit:
The source explained that al-Qaida is "no more a solid-structure network. Many of its ranking members have joined several intelligence agencies and are used to infiltrate, control and direct local Qaida-inspired fanatics to carry out attacks that serve the interests of these intelligence agencies."

Fatah al-Islam, the source added, "is one of such local groups. Its members are inspired by al-Qaida ideology, but its attacks are directed by Syrian intelligence officers."
With the help of the democratic Lebanese government, the beneficiary of the Cedar Revolution which tossed the Syrian Army out, we continue to unravel the terror network, capturing a couple of Al Qaeda big fish. And with the UN finally approving a tribunal to examine the murder of Lebanese leader Hariri, thankfully Syria's in the hot seat.

UPDATE: WaPo:
The U.N. resolution, which will take effect June 10, was approved 10 to 0 by the 15-nation council. China, Indonesia, Qatar, Russia and South Africa abstained from the vote, saying that it bypassed the Lebanese parliament's constitutional role in approving international agreements.

Cicadas on the March


Cicadas on the march. They're in the honeysuckle bushes, and taking strategic, if hopeless positions on lawn chairs. Death by lawn chair.

Dark Days Loom for Illinois

Having dodged the bullet of the Gross Receipts Tax, the future of the Illinois economy is facing another assault from the Luddites in the legislature, including some timorous and short-sighted Republicans. The electric rate freeze is on the table again and headed toward passage.

And Illinois jobs will go down the tubes and its power infrastructure will continue falling apart.

Except for the Dem-dominated power infrastructure in Springfield, which is ushering in dark days for Illinois at an accelerated pace.

Related post: Power Politics II

Stuff it, Sun Times

The Sun Times in their two editorials today has the audacity to go after a private, Catholic school, whose parents have chosen to send their children there at their own expense, while advocating in another editorial that the state sanction and profit from a gross and pernicious expansion in casino gambling to fund public schools. Gambling disproportionately harms the poor and is a regressive tax.

Come on Sun Times, be more up front. Why not directly advocate that public school students' smoke cigarettes to swell state coffers with cigarette tax revenue?

And keep your nose out of private schools' business. You're not paying for them. When you support school choice, then you can have your say. Until then, keep your sanctimonious and hypocritical posturing to yourselves.

UPDATE: Great minds, and all that:)...John Ruskin, Illinois Review has a specific example of liberal hypocrisy that neatly ties these two issues together. You can't make this stuff up.

UPDATE: Dan Proft on the real school reform legislators should address.

More on Hillary's Donors

More news on Hillary's suspect donors. My previous post was on a donor who is facing repeated charges of sexual harassment. Other pols have given the money back. Not Hillary. Now this story from a Clinton supporter. Froma Harrop, RCP:

Sometimes I forget why the Clintons disturb me. Then they offer a reminder. Case in point are reports that one of Hillary Clinton's most pampered donors made big bucks off scams against the elderly.

Vinod Gupta heads infoUSA, a "list broker" that has been selling the names of elderly Americans to known con artists. In 2002, he flew the Clintons to a vacation in Acapulco on the company jet. The Omaha-based enterprise subsequently paid Bill Clinton more than $2 million in consulting fees. Gupta gave $1 million to his foundation.

They deliberately targeted people with cancer or Alzheimers. How despicable.

UPDATE: Hill and Bill profiled by Noemie Emery on the cover of the June 4th issue of the Weekly Standard "Days of Their Lives". Very on point, read it all. I like this excerpt:

It was only when she started running for president that it began falling apart. The Clintons had been running a very long time, and even some erstwhile fans were fatigued. Eight years had gone by since impeachment, and six years since Bill had left office; they now lived separate lives. In a strange way they had managed to trade situations: He had a symbolic role, she had a real one; she had real power, he had its memory; he was a show horse, trying to find ways to fill empty hours; she was a workhorse, grinding away at her job. Their schedules, their interests, their circles were different. They were seldom at the same place at the same time in their big houses. As the marriage lost traction, so did the story and the fascination with it: People once intrigued by the strapping young president and the trim blonde with long hair lost interest in the haggard man with white hair, and the hard-looking woman who seemed to fill out her pant suits a little too amply. As the scandals grew dim, so did her celebrity aura: She was no longer the controversial co-president, the would-be Evita, the long-suffering spouse betrayed for the dubious charms of the thong-baring bimbo. She was no longer Nora leaving the Doll's House to embrace a new destiny. She was now one of a hundred United States senators, industrious, but not all that outstanding--prosaic, pedantic, and dull.

The Odyssey Scholarships


An anonymous benefactor has showered the University of Chicago with a $100 million gift to eliminate student loans for needy undergraduates. Tribune:
"A quarter of our students will have a very different experience than they had before," Michael Behnke, vice president and dean of college enrollment, said in an interview Wednesday. "They will be free from this worry about debt. It will transform student life on campus."
They will be known as the Odyssey Scholarships, "
reflecting the university's commitment to study the classics and its rigorous academic curriculum." Sun Times:
The school released few clues about the donor, but said he came from a "modest" background and graduated in the 1980s, which would put him on the younger side for such a big benefactor. They would not say whether he was a local area resident or not, or how he earned his fortune.

However, John Boyer, dean of the liberal arts college, said the donor really enjoyed classes like Greek literature, which were part of the university's core curriculum.

The U. of C. "had a profound effect on my life and in particular on allowing me to survive untold failures and persevere in mad adventures that have rewarded me with the financial resources to make this gift,'' the donor's statement said.

Sounds like a capitalist to me.

Goracle, Boracle


Al Gore assaults us with his latest book promo, so pompous even the WaPo's Dana Milbank has dared to lampoon him.
Publication this month of Gore's jeremiad against Bush, "The Assault on Reason," has fed fervent hopes among environmentalists and others on the left that he will run again for the presidency -- an unlikely prospect, but one Gore does not completely dismiss. Yet reading Gore's book, or listening to his speeches, may remind some of those same supporters what they liked least about him the first time he ran, in 2000. Gore is usually smart and sometimes prophetic -- but, all too frequently, pedantic.
Gore's the smartest guy in the world, like Hillary's the smartest woman. And more people should recognize this. Goracle the Boracle.

Previous post: Gore's Racket

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Hillary has no shame

Dan Curry, Reverse Spin, is tenaciously following this story, this just one paragraph:
The IPA saga is vintage Clinton politics. Six months after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed the “most egregious” sexual harassment lawsuit ever out of the agency’s Chicago office, Bill Clinton was yukking it up with company founder and convicted criminal John Burgess. For that appearance, Bill was paid $125,000. Later, the campaign contributions flowed to Hillary, as well as a trip in the IPA corporate jet. If she is elected president, Hillary could make the lawsuit go away in a hurry. Predictably, the National Organization for Women is silent—enabling its endorsed candidate to keep tainted money earned within the walls of a place where at least 40 women were sexually assaulted, according to the U.S. government. Obama got a small donation from IPA and returned it after news reports about Burgess’ past, state fraud investigations and the sexual harassment lawsuit surfaced. So did other politicians across the country.
Read the whole thing.

Hillary puts up with anything to win.

Pfleger Goes Too Far

The rabble-rousing radical leftist Rev. Michael Pfleger has gone too far this time. Illinois Review, quoting from the Illinois State Rifle Association:
Nobody expected Saturday's Operation PUSH protest at Chuck's Gun Shop & Range to be anything other than a circus of the bizarre. However, nobody anticipated that an address by a Chicago priest would include a call for the murder of a suburban gun shop owner and legislators who oppose gun control.

During an address at an anti-gun rally in front of Chuck's, Rev. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina's Church, exhorted the crowd to "drag" shop owner, John Riggio, from his shop "like a rat" and "snuff" him. Rev. Pfleger went on to tell the crowd that legislators that vote against gun control legislation should be "snuffed" as well. As many know, "snuff" is slang for especially violent murder.
Audio here. The Second Amendment Foundation calls for an investigation of these death threats.

He's not fit to preach, nor should he serve in any parish.

Related posts: Amended Thinking on the 2nd

Show Me the Money

Bogus cost savings, but higher taxes a sure thing in the Edwards and now Obama health care plans. DOA in Congress? Dissected at WSJ's Washington Wire.

Related post: Obama on the Stump

Don't be unpatriotic


Google does not symbolically commemorate Memorial Day. Bloggers have noticed.

Some suggestions for Google (don't be unpatriotic).

Obama on the Stump

Salon profiles Obama, "Barack Obama's quiet rebellion :
There was only one thing that was surprising about Obama's answer -- he never once acknowledged that he was talking to the father of a soldier headed into a brutal war zone, a parent who feared that his son might die in a conflict that has lost any rationale or larger meaning.

This is not to argue in any way that Obama is unfeeling, but rather to stress that his campaign style avoids many of the commonplace rituals of political life. Obama also seems reluctant to play the populist card that has been a staple of Democratic rhetoric for decades. Previewing his plan for universal healthcare coverage at an ice-cream party in a downtown park in Berlin, N.H., Sunday night, Obama went out of his way to declare, "I'm not somebody who will run down the insurance companies and the drug companies just for the sake of it."

His style is detached, he's professorial, not a natural pol. I wouldn't call it a rebellion. And his policy prescriptions are not radical for a Dem, mostly a throwback to a 70's collectivist mentality. And it's the same old anti-business mantra.

Previous post: Blue State Blues no More?, Obama, McCain Exchange

Bug Buzz




More cicadas emerging. We have an audible buzz now.

Gray Lady Scopes Wilmette

NY Times boilerplate on Republicans supposedly losing their base on the war, dateline Wilmette. They called me on this one on my way out of town, but I am not a fan of the Times, as you know, and was not going to talk to the gray old lady media.

As far as Kirk's district goes, demographics have made it less Republican. The inner suburbs are trending Democrat as the exurbs are more Republican, but as we all know, Illinois overall is a Democrat rout these last few years.

Kirk has always had close wins, as much of his support is a libertarian strain of Republican---socially liberal, fiscally conservative, and usually isolationist---tempered by an appreciation for free trade and the role of America as leader of the free world. It's a delicate balance, a polite dance of Kirk and his constituents. He is more independent than not, and so represents the 10th district fairly well.

But I would say he survived a challenge by an attractive Democrat candidate in the national Democrat tsunami year, so I would think his seat is defensible.

Kirk is also a strong supporter of Israel, a key stance for this district.

Postscript: Besides, now that the Democrats control Congress again, people are reminded of what rats they are.

Gambling with Illinois' Future

A budget standoff among the Democrat leadership in Springfield may finally allow Republican input if no agreement is reached Thursday, but until then all bets are off. Tribune with a story and editorial on more casinos as the sticking point:
The even more egregious proposal -- allegedly sidelined Tuesday, but the session isn't over till it's over -- would divert to many of the Emerald investors the roughly $33 million they dumped into a casino project they thought would make them multimillionaires. If citizens have to pay out this money, it'll be a pure rip-off -- and any Illinois legislator who plays along with Jones should have to eat that vote for the rest of his or her career. Remember, Emerald imploded because the Illinois Gaming Board learned that its officials had repeatedly lied to state investigators and had tolerated investors with alleged mob connections. If the investors feel cheated, they can pursue lawsuits against those Emerald officials.
The Tribune goes on to list those highly-connected investors.

Too many legislators and public officials mix the personal and political, viewing the public dime as their own personal piggy bank. Enough. They are gambling with the future of Illinois, squandering taxpayer dollars on pet projects for their friends while the state is mired in debt.

Immigration and National Security

Hugh Hewitt with the key point on the proposed immigration bill:
Fred, Mitt and Rudy have all blasted the bill, but each should produce a specific indictment of McCain-Kennedy 2.0 that centers on the bill's utter refusal to recognize the new world in which we operate. It isn't just a bill to regularize millions of Spanish speaking economic immigrants from Mexico and Central America's poorest regions.

It is also a bill to regularize hundreds of thousands if not millions of visas jumpers and illegal border-crossers who began their trek in countries that nest significant jihadist networks. Focusing Americans on the problem this presents, and doing so in a way that avoids even remote echoes of nativism while preserving the candor that seriousness permits and indeed obliges will establish these candidates are ready to lead in the post-Bush era. The bill completely fails to address huge gaps in our defense at the borders and entry points across the country and threatens to overwhelm an already heavily burdened security system with tens of millions of new obligations without any sort of manpower or funding plus-up.

We need a serious and focused debate that reassures Americans on these national security issues, and a bill that addresses them.

Related posts: No Idea, Part of the Solution

UPDATE: Sun Times:
The father of a Chicago alderman allegedly snapped the photos that were in the middle of a sophisticated fake ID scheme that culminated in a controversial Little Village raid last month.

Federal authorities say Elias Munoz, 62, of Chicago took the photos to help provide fake documents to Chicagoans every year. Munoz, who owns Nuevo Foto Munoz at 3105 W. 26th St., was charged with taking part in a larger scheme that ensnared 22 people last month.

Tribune:

On three consecutive days, the complaint says, undercover agents had photos taken at the shop and got bogus identification.

Among the items allegedly found in the shop were hundreds of blank Illinois and U.S. identification cards, blank laminates and information stamps. As part of the allegedly illegal work at the photo shop, authorities said, Munoz kept a box of blank order forms.

Lady Nancy, Eco-Tourist


Continuing her Lady Stanhope style tours, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi jetted off on a fleeting eco-tourist visit to Greenland. Apparently Greenland is turning green again.

Previous post: Not the End of the World

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Women Fight Back


Iron Flowers in Thailand.

Saudi women wear colorful, fashionable abayas. One woman in Malaysia bravely converts to Christianity.

Hirsi Ali in Oz.

And thankfully Cindy Sheehan has left the scene.

Rudy Leads the Right

Giuliani leading among social conservatives in a new poll---44% think he's the most electable and 30% give him their support. More from The Politico:
With the primaries a half year away, the pushback within evangelical leadership may still trickle down to the grassroots. But thirty-one percent of social conservatives have given the 2008 presidential candidates "a lot" of thought. Only 23 percent of other Republicans have given the race the same level of scrutiny.

Giuliani has tried to appeal to social conservatives, embracing their agenda by pledging to appoint "strict constructionists" to the Supreme Court, using Justices John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito Jr. as examples. Conservatives expect "strict constructionists" to determine that the Constitution does not mandate abortion rights.

But, like Dwight Eisenhower's in 1952, Giuliani's national security stature after the Sept. 11 attacks more likely explains his continued popularity within the religious right, whose voters have long held hawkish positions on the issue.

I think that's right.

It's all still in play, though conservatives don't trust McCain on social or even tax issues. Romney leads in Iowa, and Thompson is still in the wings.

Here's my initial take on Rudy. And here. I haven't really changed my mind.

UPDATE: Giuliani on the campaign trail. HT RCP Blog. The NY Times says he trying to soften his edges, but he sticks to his message. In response to the question, "Why do they hate us?":

Rudolph William Louis Giuliani III’s eyes pop wide. His eyebrows rise. He is blinking rapidly. For veteran Rudy watchers, all signs point to a rhetorical lunge for this woman’s jugular.

Except he pauses and looks down at his feet and looks up again and — smiles.

“Ma’am, I really respectfully disagree,” the former mayor tells her. “Maybe I’ll answer your question with a question. Respectfully, again, I don’t think you understand the nature of the threat.” [snip]

“They hate you,” he says of the Islamic terrorists, bringing his hands up to his chest. “They don’t want you to be in this college, or you, or you — —.”

Mr. Giuliani wheels around and points toward another middle-aged woman in the front row, who looks momentarily startled. “And you can’t wear that outfit because you’re showing your arms.”

“This is reality, ma’am,” he continues, his voice streaked with just a touch of exasperation. “This isn’t me making it up. I saw reality after 9/11. You’ve got to clear your head.”

His answer meets with sustained applause.

UPDATE: New Rasmussen poll, via RCP shows Romney edging McCain.

Blue State Blues no More?

Sweet on the new Illinois primary date:
The unintended byproduct of Illinois moving up its primary to boost White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) is putting the state in major play for the GOP presidential candidates.

"It really is wide open on the Republican side," said Illinois Republican Party chairman Andy McKenna.

"It's ironic," he said. "A move to help Obama helps the Republican Party.''

That remains to be seen. It'll take more than a presidential primary to bring back the walking wounded Illinois Republican party, with its wounds largely self-inflicted by the out-of-touch party elite. It does hold the promise, though, of substantive debate on the issues to clarify what it means to be a Republican, a message the party leaders could benefit from.

Whatever it takes to get those Blue State Blues out of our heads.

UPDATE: This is not promising.

The Duke of Cook

Sun Times editorial on the imperious Duke of Cook County, Todd Stroger.

Now he's talking about raising property taxes, surprise, surprise.

Related posts: Peraica Kitchen Talk, Stroger Stunner

UPDATE: Tony Peraica to introduce no confidence resolution. Guest post at Illinois Review.

Bless Bryan, and all our Vets


Hey, I'm not a Cubs fan, but this is a heartwarmer. Iraq veteran and Army Sgt. Bryan Anderson throws out the first pitch yesterday, making a gutsy recovery from his grievous injuries. Sun Times. Photo by Tom Cruze, Sun Times.

Playtime Hamas Style

Hamas exploits children again. Sickening video at LGF.

UPDATE: And here's another unbelievable story---rape by decree. Guess what part of the world it hails from. BBC reports.

Related post: Death Cult Women's Rights

Monday, May 28, 2007

Cicada Sighting


Pretty tame so far, a few on our 3 year old oak tree. (I didn't want a real close-up look).

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Obama, McCain Exchange

Obama lamely in the Trib in response to McCain. RedState with a pithy summation. NRO cuts through the Big O's BS. Via RCP.

Previous post: Hill and the Big O say NO

Friday, May 25, 2007

A Few Flowers

Thought I'd get in a "before" pix. Don't remember if cicadas eat flowers. (It's been 17 years.) They are due this weekend.

And remember our troops and their families this Memorial Day Weekend with Operation Hero Miles.

Postscript: Chris Muir comments Day by Day.

Durbin Challenger?

A top executive at the CBOT, Kevin J.P. O'Hara, is considering throwing his hat in the ring against Sen. Dick Durbin. Bernard Schoenburg, State-Journal (scroll down):

O'Hara, 45, does have a great resume. Born in New York City, his family moved to Illinois when he was 9. He's a graduate of Loyola Academy high school in Wilmette, the University of Chicago and the Georgetown University law school.

He joined the board of trade a year ago after being executive vice president of NYSE Group Inc. He had joined Archipelago Holdings Inc., in 1999 and was its chief administrative officer, general counsel and corporate secretary before it merged with the New York Stock Exchange in 2006.

"We built the company from zero," he said of Archipelago, which developed an electronic trading system. "We literally changed what was going on" on the stock-trading floor, he said.

Someone who's smart and understands the real world. That would be a welcome change from Durbin.

Related posts: Do Nothing Durbin, Durbin Knee Deep

Award-Winning BoomerGirl

My RedSkirt BoomerGirl editor, Cathy Hamilton, accepted the award:
Yesterday in Miami, BoomerGirl.com won a prestigious Eppy award in the category of Best Newspaper-Affiliated Web Site with fewer than 1 million unique monthly visitors. The Eppy awards were presented at the Interactive Media Conference sponsored by Editor & Publisher and Mediaweek. We are beyond thrilled and are grateful to our contributors, bloggers, advertisers and especially our readers, who make BoomerGirl.com the dynamic community it is.
Cathy's also written a book, "Boomer Girl: Fighting Midlife One Crisis at a Time".

Peraica Kitchen Talk

Tony Peraica straight from his kitchen to yours. And a great, informative website on Cook County by Tony Peraica, still on the job for taxpayers. HT Bill Baar.

Related post: Stroger Stunner

Eco Rebuttal

As folks gas up for the Memorial Day weekend getaway, a few articles on the myths of ethanol, here and here.

Food for thought here, here and here. (HT ResPublica)

And a kick in the pants to the Goracle. And another.

Related posts: NOT the End of the World, Cool the Alarmism

Islam vs. Islamists to Air

The film PBS tried to cut off at the knees will finally air due to outrage from the Right on their censorship, with taxpayer dollars. Islam vs. Islamists, giving voice to moderate Islam will air via a PBS affiliate in Oregon.

Another moderate Muslim heard at HotAir.

Hill and the Big O say NO

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama cave to the angry anti-American, anti-war at any price Left, voting no on the bill to fund our troops in Iraq. Tribune story here.

These two want to be commander in chief and they can't support our troops in this most fundamental way. They would deny our soldiers reinforcements and equipment when these brave Americans are laying their lives on the line every day to protect us and our way of life.

These two want us to believe they would have the guts to face down evil dictators and vicious terrorist killers when they can't even face down the Nutroots on the Left?

I've thought for a long time Obama was all hat, no cattle, as they used to say about Bush, (unfairly, I might add) but the Hillary vote disappoints. She's going to be in trouble on this one for the general election, because not only does she have her very liberal background to overcome (working for hard-leftist Saul Alinsky), she has the making-the-world-safe-for-Osama legacy of her husband's administration. And she wants to be commander in chief, the leader of the free world, without having managed more than her own campaigns.

You will also note she waited for Obama to vote, before casting her own no vote. Lots of political courage there.

They were for the troops...before they were against them.

Tom Bevan, RCP Blog with more analysis on the polls related to this vote.

Related post: Fatal Limits to Liberals' Foreign Policy

UPDATE: The Al Qaeda Torture Manual. At Hugh Hewitt.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Happy talk from CAIR

Tucker Carlson interviews the bland face of evil, Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR. (Earlier related post here.) Happy talk for us dim dhimmis. HT LGF.
Previous post on CAIR: The Contempt of CAIR

BoomerGirl wins EPpy!


Bragging about this, BoomerGirl, which hosts my RedSkirt blog, wins an EPpy!!!

Fatal Limits to Liberals' Foreign Policy

More on Iran's high-profile hostages. Previous post here on scholar Haleh Esfandiari. The WSJ draws our attention to another forced guest of the Ahmadinejad regime, a consultant for megabucks Democrat bankroller and self-styled brilliant philosopher George Soros:
Meanwhile, Iran has also detained Iranian-American consultant Kian Tajbakhsh, who was working for George Soros's Open Society Institute. "We are concerned for his safety and call for his immediate release," the institute said in a statement.
They sent him a letter. They made a statement. No response. Obviously big whoop on the open society concept in Iran.

Liberals think these creeps will give them a pass, since they never call them the evil they are. Expressing concern is as far as they will ever go, while innocents are brutalized all around the world. They sit in safety, enjoying the protection of the good old US of A, never appreciating it.

Who will take on the brutal bully killers of the world? My representative, Congressperson Jan Schakowsky and her hippie-socialist "Forever Young"-sters? Al Gore and his Lear-Jet liberal Hollywood friends? John Kerry, tough in wetsuit on windsurfer off Martha's Vineyard? John Edwards with his bumper sticker figleaf excuse for a foreign policy? Barack Obama with his fatal charm?

Maybe Hillary could kill them with a look.

We may have to send in the Marines.

Meanwhile, our troops continue to win hearts and minds.

UPDATE: Lefty embed to Dems: troops want to fight on. At HotAir. The Nutroots are aghast at signs of success.

UPDATE: Mitt on Edwards:
UPDATE: Rudy on Edwards:

Meanwhile, Hillary puts out a ditzy ad. Guess she's trying to soften the killer look, about the only thing she has going for her on foreign policy.

Democrats Demonize

The Left trashed former Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft as some kind of religious Neanderthal once he became a member of the Bush administration, conveniently erasing his years of stellar service as a Senator and Governor, elected repeatedly by the people of Missouri. Now that they find him useful to bash the Bush administration he is a "great patriot". Jonah Goldberg in the Trib:
First, the attacks on Ashcroft were always grotesquely unfair. As a presidential candidate, Howard Dean -- who often decries how Republicans question the patriotism of Democrats -- saw nothing wrong with flatly asserting that Ashcroft was "not a patriot. He's a direct descendant of Joseph McCarthy." A second lesson is that the Christian scare that has been spooking liberals often amounts to mass paranoia. In 2001, USA Today's former Supreme Court reporter asked, sincerely, "Can a deeply religious person be attorney general?" The bigotry of the question should be self-evident, and the answer equally obvious. In almost every way, Ashcroft was the Bush administration's most exemplary Cabinet official. An undisputed hawk on the war on terror, he was nonetheless immune to the groupthink that has plagued the Bush White House.
Daniel Henninger, WSJ with more commentary on the perils of a permanent opposition.

I would date the polarizing talk to the early 90's, when Republicans and people of faith were branded as extremists by the Democrats at every level of politics. If you questioned whether welfare really helped more people than it hurt, you were an extremist. If you thought maybe your school should spend less dollars on consultants, and more in the classroom, or wondered why the school hired so many subsitute teachers on Mondays and Fridays, you were an extremist. If you believed in God and the sanctity of life, you were an extremist.

When he came to Washington President Bush tried to be a uniter, not a divider. And he has always been gracious in his speech, no matter the provocation and slander, the grotesque BushHitler comparisons. The Democrats criticize and demonize, they offer nothing constructive. They would rather destroy their opponents than debate them. Democrats engage in character assassination, while our real enemies plot to assassinate us all.

That's why the Democrats will never get me back. Never. They lost me in the Carter administration due to his self-pitying incompetence, and they're still losing me by forcing Joe Lieberman out over Iraq, and by their esteem of Jimmy Carter, one of their leaders to this day, who engages in anti-Semitic hate speech and says unpardonable things about our current president.

Stroger Stunner

Treating Cook County as his personal fiefdom, Board President Todd Stroger's latest stunner. Sun Times:
On paper, he works for the Cook County agency that represents those too poor to hire a lawyer.

But in reality, attorney Richard Velazquez is being paid to give legal advice to County Board President Todd Stroger.

The move has stunned county commissioners and some in the public defender's office, but Stroger said Wednesday there's nothing wrong with his decision to hire Velazquez on the public defender's budget -- only to use him as his own attorney.

Maybe Stroger will be indigent at some point, if he gets convicted of something, (we can only hope), but he can well afford to pay a lawyer on his six figure salary.

And why does he need personal legal advice, hmm?

Previous post: Latest on Cook County, Stroger's PR

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Death Cult Women's Rights

Yesterday the Tribune covered the story of a young girl stoned to death in Iraq. (My initial post here.) Latest manifestation of the insanity (this is "ordinary") that pervades some quarters of the Muslim world, and the subhuman treatment of women. LGF on women in Palestine:
It’s another death cult press conference, featuring the women’s wing of the militant wing of the “moderate” Fatah party. Notice the camera in the lower right corner.
A little gentle coercion there, probably the latest twist on honor killings (either we kill you or you kill yourself) in a culture whose heroines are mothers or widows of suicide bombers.

Meanwhile in Iran a prominent Iranian-American scholar and "bridge-builder" has been thrown into prison. She gets some attention. WaPo:
Editorials in top American and European newspapers -- as well as publications ranging from the Daily Princetonian to Glamour -- have angrily condemned Iran's action. American academics have announced boycotts of Iran and called for demonstrations against Iranian missions around the world, while the 2,700-member Middle East Studies Association wrote Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warning of the "chilling impact" of Esfandiari's imprisonment on scholars worldwide. [snip]

Esfandiari's personal passion was women's rights. She had lately been conducting workshops in the Middle East to educate female activists on how to run for office, get involved in the economy and change laws that restrict the rights of women.snip Ebadi, the Nobel laureate who has taken Esfandiari's case, wrote in 2000 about her own stint in Evin Prison: "They took away all my belongings, even my spectacles, although there was nothing to read. Loneliness and silence could drive one crazy.
Iran imprisons the bridge builders. Let's talk?!! I don't think so. And where are the American feminists on all of this? They are largely silent. Christina Hoff Sommers, The Weekly Standard, "The Subjection of Islamic Women":
The reasons are rooted in the worldview of the women who shape the concerns and activities of contemporary American feminism. That worldview is--by tendency and sometimes emphatically--antagonistic toward the United States, agnostic about marriage and family, hostile to traditional religion, and wary of femininity. The contrast with Islamic feminism could hardly be greater.

Writing in The New Republic in 1999, philosopher Martha Nussbaum noted with disapproval that "feminist theory pays relatively little attention to the struggles of women outside the United States." Too many fashionable gender theorists, she said, have lost their dedication to the public good. Their "hip quietism . . . collaborates with evil."

Those few feminists who speak up are ostracized. And what is NOW promoting these days? Love your body:

NOW has just launched a 2007 "Love Your Body" calendar as part of its ongoing initiative of the same name. The body calendar warns of an increase in eating disorders and includes a photograph celebrating the shape of pears. There is also an image of the Statue of Liberty with the caption, "Give me your curves, your wrinkles, your natural beauty yearning to breathe free." The calendar bears these inspiring words: "None of us is free until we are all free.
Wow. How vapid and airhead can you get. These feminists kinda give women a bad name.

Some food for thought for here at home. In the first Pew poll of its kind, a substantial majority of Muslim Americans want to mainstream and believe you can be successful here if you work hard. That is good news indeed. But disturbingly (as LGF points out) 60% don't believe groups of Arabs carried out the Sept. 11th attacks, and younger Muslims are more likely to think suicide bombings are justified. The Sun Times has a story as well. (Why do they leave out the stat on Sept. 11th? Too disturbing? Doesn't fit the PC victim template the story follows? Apparently the Sun Times thinks Muslim-Americans were the real victims of Sept. 11th.)

Previous posts: Burqa Babes on the Net, Iran the Great Satan, The Sublime Quran

UPDATE: Iranian women beaten bloody by the "Modesty Police". Video at Gateway Pundit.

Bible Thumping Blagojevich


The Tribune with a front page story on our our beleagured Governor Blagojevich:
Federal prosecutors have subpoenaed records from Gov. Rod Blagojevich's campaign fund as part of a sweeping corruption investigation into whether top aides and advisers exchanged state business and jobs for political support, the Tribune has learned. The recent move is the first public indication that political financial records belonging to the governor are being sought. Sources describe the subpoena as the latest step in an ongoing investigation that has focused on major players in the record-breaking fundraising effort that propelled Blagojevich to consecutive terms. Blagojevich has steadfastly refused to answer questions about the federal investigation, including specifics of why his campaign has paid the prominent law firm Winston & Strawn nearly $1 million since 2003.
Our glib governor cites the Bible as he evades questions:
"But I feel real good about all the different things that we do because we follow the rules and we do things right and at the end of the day, as they say in the Bible, the truth shall set you free. The truth is what it is. And the truth is we do things right."
Maybe Winston & Strawn will set you free. But we look forward to seeing you put your hand on that bible, governor, and swear to tell the whole truth. So help you God.

NTHS Wins Grammy


Rated the number school in the country for the quality of its musicians and music dept. this year, New Trier High School wins a Grammy. Initial story here. You can download the celebration performance, live last night, at NTJAZZ.com, featuring the Symphonic Wind Ensemble, Swing Choir, Symphony Orchestra, Concert Choir, Jazz Ensemble I and Choir-Opera.

(And my senior is all done with classes!)

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

McCain Flameout

Sen. John McCain, inflaming the immigration issue, going after Gov. Mitt Romney in a particularly personal and unpleasant way. McCain always aims his most virulent rhetoric at his fellow Republicans. Not much to like there.

More from the RCP Blog.

The Stupid Tax

Well, fine if Blue Skirt (Red Skirt here) thinks we should all be St. Francis of Assisi, give up all our worldly goods and live simply among the gentle creatures of the earth. Her supposition is that the estate tax will solve poverty, homelessness and perhaps afford us eternal youth---it's a moral imperative. You'd think it was the Holy Grail.

But liberals aren't really looking for more morality they're looking for more money. Other people's money. If they really cared so much about those less fortunate they would give directly to charity on their own. They don't, as documented. Even poor conservatives give a greater proportion of their income to charity than the average liberal. But liberals are happy for the government to take other people's money through taxes, so they can feel compassionate without expending any of their own. The estate tax gives liberals special satisfaction because they think it's the scourge of the rich at their death. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Do liberals think without the estate tax the rich will set up a penthouse in the sky? It's the politics of envy even to the grave.

Of course the estate tax taxes the heirs.

But like so many liberal arguments dressed up as compassion when you look at the facts they are threadbare.

Why do liberals always legislate grandiose schemes for the greater good that in reality beggar individuals and families? How does this make any sense at all for the betterment of society?

Is the estate tax really the scourge of the rich?

Should we base public policy on Envy? (It is one of the Seven Deadly Sins, after all.)

Does the tax at the coffin reap a huge return to government coffers, enough to cure all social ills?

First of all, the estate tax is a double tax. These Americans are taxed on their income and again at their death. This is unfair on its face. Sounds un-American to me. Why should the government get to double dip?

Secondly, it discourages wealth creation. Savings and economic growth suffer. Blue Skirt seems to think neither theory nor evidence supports this, but this is simple human nature. The easiest way to avoid paying the death tax is to spend it or give it away before you die. This is fine for a very few hugely wealthy people like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, but the consequence to the rest of society is to massively discourage savings. And of course, savings generate the capital needed for economic growth in a healthy society. Many small businesses are taxed as individuals, then their estates are taxed at death. Their fixed assets---manufacturing machinery or farm equipment and the worth of their land and buildings may push them into a high tax bracket subject to the estate tax. These businesses don't throw off enough cash to pay the death tax so the children who inherit a family business built up over a lifetime may be forced to sell to pay this onerous tax. Jobs will be destroyed.

Small businesses create roughly 80% of the jobs in this country, and last I checked, women accounted for over half of them. Some of them are doubtless single women providing for their families, working hard to give their children a good start in life. Why should they be punished? And I would add, the best solution to poverty is a job.

Then there is the cost of compliance. It runs to the billions, because no one wants to be unlucky enough to die when they've just gotten a windfall, and they have to keep updating their estate plan to anticipate that Congress might be slow to account for inflation and revise the level upward before it kicks in. (think the AMT) (First they came for the "wealthy", then they came for you.) People care about their surviving spouses and children and so are forced to subsidize accountants and lawyers to navigate the maze of the gift tax and estate tax. Hmm, a helpful survivors guide from the IRS which goes on in mind-numbing detail. Then 31 pages of instructions to understand the 41 page form 706 (U.S. Estate Tax Return), not to mention the mere 12 pages of instructions to understand the 4 page form to give a gift (Form 709 U.S. Gift Tax Return). Apparently it is better to give to the government. And this is just the beginning.

But if you insist, liberals, who do you really think should pay this tax? Unaccountable rich persons? Bill Gates and Warren Buffett? But do they pay it? No. Are they accountable? No. They endow foundations, so instead of taxing the Rockefellers, you tax the Rockefeller Foundation. Foundations are notoriously unaccountable, even to their founders. The estate tax merely transforms the wealth in this case.

And the amount taken in by the Feds is miniscule, about 1% of estimated total tax receipts in a year.

To sum up, the estate tax is levied on those who are rich, unlucky (die at the wrong time) and stupid (think they can afford not to hire those lawyers and accountants).

The best argument for the estate tax is someone like Paris Hilton. But we've had this tax for some years and it hasn't prevented her from enjoying unearned income. Why is that? Generations of planning by the Hilton family.

As U. of Chicago Economics professor Gary S. Becker goes on to say:
The energy and political capital spent on supporting high estate taxes is better spent on trying to raise opportunities to children from poor families by improving their education, training, and health.
So forget about Paris and give to your local St. Francis or Mother Teresa. Or start a small business. And let's get rid of the Stupid Tax.

Monday, May 21, 2007

Obama an Electable Liberal?

Is Obama more electable than Hillary? Peter Brown, RCP:
Clearly, Obama has that opportunity. In those same Quinnipiac polls in which Sen. Clinton leads him substantially among Democrats, his more than 2.5-1 favorable/unfavorable ratio among the overall electorate is much better than hers.

That's because independents view him favorably by a 50-12 margin. Yet, more than a third of voters do not know enough about him to have an opinion.

The question is how that third of the electorate and many who have a hazy view of Obama will feel as his views and values become better known.

As Brown points out, Barack's a liberal. I would add he is slightly to the right of Dennis Kucinich, only better spoken and better looking. The last time we elected a president no one knew much about we got Jimmy Carter, the closest thing to a French surrender monkey that has ever "led" this country.

Previous post: Barack Jumps the Shark?

UPDATE: Salon on Michelle Obama's sacrifice, blah, blah. They decided to have children. That should change your life. Someone needs to be around for them. End of story.

There Are No Children

Dennis Byrne on target as usual:
As if to prove that virginity and abstinence are on the run, the new Democrat-controlled Congress is expected to kill a $50 million abstinence education program designed to delay sexual initiation, hopefully until marriage.

The programs include instruction on human anatomy, sexually transmitted diseases, building self-esteem and other techniques that will help combat the powerful peer pressure and cultural messages that encourage early sexual activity. This Title V abstinence program shouldn't be confused with "abstinence-plus" programs, whose basic message is, "Yes, well, abstinence is a fine idea in theory, but if you can't control yourself -- and you won't be able to -- here is how to sexually gratify yourself."

You can be sure that under the Democrats, such how-to programs will continue to be funded, but not the abstinence-only programs. Republicans, when they controlled Congress, at least let the two types of programs exist side-by-side. Democrats apparently can't tolerate kids being told both sides.
Democrats, they're for the children. For exploiting them.

Related posts: It's Educational!, Plan B Over the Counter

Feel the Love

LGF:

An unbelievable story from the University of California Irvine, where the Muslim Students Union is holding a virulently anti-Israel hate week, and at the same time trying to claim victimhood: FBI actions at UCI questioned.

The OC Register says the “FBI” is being questioned. But notice—the students not only tried to detain the agent, they threw a cinderblock at his car.

More here, also this response from a creative rabbi:

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Faith in Action

Front page story in the Tribune on Wilmette native and Army captain Father John Barkemeyer in Anbar province, Iraq. "The Good Shepherd":
But most of Barkemeyer's flock lives off the base. To reach them, he travels by convoy from outpost to outpost, another soldier hidden under body armor and a helmet. He's accompanied by Pfc. Ashley Solorio, a 20-year-old Texan so small her rifle reaches from the ground to her elbow.

Instead of a gun, Barkemeyer carries a camouflage bag, from which he pulls a white and yellow robe, a round brass box holding the Eucharist and a brass cup for wine that the Army won't let him fill. When he says "This is the blood of Christ," he raises an empty cup.
Father Berkemeyer is the only Catholic priest in Anbar province, often saying 5 masses a day, traveling constantly.
With that volume of visits, "I doubted my ability to serve these soldiers," Barkemeyer said. It was the constant death, not the visits, he added. "I knew I could keep it up for a couple of weeks, and then I'd be in uncharted waters."

But just as Barkemeyer thought about giving up in February, violence dropped off. Local sheiks banded together and teamed with Americans to fight Al Qaeda insurgents.

"Talk about the presence of God," Barkemeyer said. It was the answer to many prayers, he says.
If you would like to help Fr. Barkemeyer and our troops, you can donate to ComPadres.org, a group he started to give them a few creature comforts and taste of home in the little free time they have.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Moore, Roskam to Speak

I've been doing spring concerts (doo-wah) and my oldest graduated from college last weekend. Back blogging next week.

Don't forget Stephen Moore of the WSJ will speak at a luncheon on Wed., May 30th in Glencoe, details here.

The Republican Jewish Coalition hosts Rep. Peter Roskam and his wife who will share their experiences of their 10 day trip to Israel at an event on Thurs., May 31st at 6:30 p.m. in Skokie.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Blue and Green Hawaii

Education Notes

Lots of links piling up, so here goes...

On May 16 charter schools lobby Springfield. Give them your support and ask your legislator to raise caps on charter schools in Illinois.

The Independent Women's Forum paper: Help Boys Achieve Their Academic Potential Through School Choice.

Cinny at District 211 has an offering on corruption in the schools---betrayal of children and the public trust.

Sometimes you live long enough for a victory, however pyrrhic, at least for your own kids, but others will benefit in future. This was a major misuse of resources and a huge drain on student teaching time that could be better spent on math, science and reading for example. Al Gore's version of the chicken in every pot, the yellow brick road of the "information" highway to put a laptop on every desk as a "best practice" by know-it-all liberal educators has been proven to be a bust. And worse. And massively expensive. Millions, repeat millions per school district. And for what? (I'm still muttering millions, remember that when schools ask for more money as they always do---they routinely WASTE it on megabuck bells and whistles and often neglect to teach your kids.)

NY TIMES, (the irony). I quote a bit in case you can't get the article:
LIVERPOOL, N.Y. — The students at Liverpool High have used their school-issued laptops to exchange answers on tests, download pornography and hack into local businesses. When the school tightened its network security, a 10th grader not only found a way around it but also posted step-by-step instructions on the Web for others to follow (which they did).

Scores of the leased laptops break down each month, and every other morning, when the entire school has study hall, the network inevitably freezes because of the sheer number of students roaming the Internet instead of getting help from teachers.

So the Liverpool Central School District, just outside Syracuse, has decided to phase out laptops starting this fall, joining a handful of other schools around the country that adopted one-to-one computing programs and are now abandoning them as educationally empty — and worse.

Many of these districts had sought to prepare their students for a technology-driven world and close the so-called digital divide between students who had computers at home and those who did not.

After seven years, there was literally no evidence it had any impact on student achievement — none,” said Mark Lawson, the school board president here in Liverpool, one of the first districts in New York State to experiment with putting technology directly into students’ hands. “The teachers were telling us when there’s a one-to-one relationship between the student and the laptop, the box gets in the way. It’s a distraction to the educational process.”

Sigh. @#%##!!!!! And this:

Alice McCormick, who heads the math department, said most math teachers preferred graphing calculators, which students can use on the Regents exams, to laptops, which often do not have mathematical symbols or allow students to show their work for credit. “Let’s face it, math is for the most part still a paper-and-pencil activity when you’re learning it,” she said.
Another iteration on merit pay---(Could be done much more simply with the market, but the Trib apparently still believes public education is salvageable in Chicago.)

Daniel Pipes, A Madrassa Grows in Brooklyn ( A cautionary tale---we have got to jettison the multiculti moral relativism, the idea that you can't critically assess scholarship or the lack of it. We can't have public schools teaching total falsehoods.)

More concern here about multiculturalism--little girls wearing headscarves, training for the hijab in America. While I think modesty is important and should be respected, do we want to acquiesce as a country to a culture that essentially enslaves women? France bans headscarves in schools. At first I thought this was wrong, (I also thought, France punts on the war on terror but bullies girls?) but then I learned that some girls are forced to wear them by peer pressure when they might not wish to. I guess I think headscarves, maybe, but not covering the face. What do you think?

UPDATE: Higher education under the microscope.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

The Protocols of the Daily Kos

A Daily KOS member calls it quits. Daily KOS, the premier liberal blog that's driving the Democrats' cravenly evil foreign policy. Hat tip LGF.
I have been a member here on dkos for several months. I have read many diaries, and even wrote a few. Today I have decided to leave dkos.
This final diary details why.

In short:

After reading many articles here, I have come to the conclusion that this site has such a wide range of extremist views, that I no longer feel I have a room here - as the moderate I view myself.

Intro

Reading these past months on dkos has led me to believe that people here, under the "progressive" banner, support views that end up in one place: Me dead.

Some call it "Justice".
Some call it "Inalienable rights".
Some call it "anti-Zionism".

The goal is the same, and the reason is not people's concern for Human rights, of even Palestinian rights. Its just plain old Israel Bashing as a way to clear people's conscience by finding a scapegoat and a target for their pacifist post-modernist views.

They used to say a conservative was a liberal mugged by reality. But now you could end up dead. So could we all.

Barack Jumps the Shark?

Has Barack Obama's campaign for president jumped the shark? Since the Dem debate, Hillary has widened her lead in the polls, Barack has made a glaring gaffe (10,000? Make that 12 statewide. Has he ever been to Kansas? Isn't that where his mom's from?). Now a Boston columnist weighs in:
Meet Barack Obama, the BradleyDeanBabbittTsongas of the 2008 election cycle.

I can't recapitulate in just a few words the outpourings of numerous magazine covers, network television features , and acres of cuddly op-ed commentary. In their current revue, Chicago's Second City comedy troupe lampoons Obama-mania: "Barack is accessible," one actor explains to a fictional Hillary Clinton. "You want to talk to him, you want to hang out with him. You want him to lie on top of you and sing you a lullaby."

Yuck.

Previous post: Obama Media Makeover

UPDATE: Powerline on tornadoes. Yeah, we have them in Chicago, but further south than where Obama lives. I grew up in a little town. Tornadoes. Every summer a possibility. But usually skipped over.

Have a Nice day

Here's the link to the summary report of the "Finance" Committee on "Affordable" housing for the village of Wilmette. It was "received", not accepted by the village board at the meeting last night, with emphasis that a follow up meeting to discuss the report in its entirety (explore the universe) will occur in the near future. The full report, which runs some 500 pages, undoubtedly a marvel of command and control, is available at the Village Hall. If you dare.

Please let the trustees, including those newly elected (assuming office at the May 22nd meeting), know what you think of this.

And have a nice day.

Previous post: Bolshevik Tactics

No Idea

FoxNews:
Three brothers charged in the alleged Fort Dix terror plot have been living illegally in the U.S. for more than 23 years and were accepted as Americans by neighbors and friends who had no idea they would scheme to attack military bases and slaughter GIs.

A federal law enforcement source confirmed to FOX News that the three — Dritan "Anthony" or "Tony" Duka, 28; Shain Duka, 26; and Eljvir "Elvis" Duka, 23 — also accumulated 19 traffic citations, but because they operated in "sanctuary cites," where law enforcement does not routinely report illegal immigrants to homeland security, none of the tickets raised red flags.

The brothers entered the United States near Brownsville, Texas, in 1984, the source said, which would put their ages at 1 to 6 when they crossed the border.
No idea at all. How many sanctuary cities do you know about?

Previous post: FBI Stings Jihadists

UPDATE: LGF makes an excellent point---WHAT DOES THIS DO TO THE "ROOT CAUSES" THEORY OF TERRORSIM?

UPDATE: Olberman

I'm from Chicago

That night, on the northwest side, Rahm Emanuel was elected to Congress. A former Clinton whiz kid who'd gotten his start as a fundraiser for Mayor Richard M. Daley, Emanuel was connected -- in the three years after leaving the White House (where he'd helped push through NAFTA), he earned $16 million putting together Wall Street mergers. He was also zealously partisan. He had once owned a consulting business devoted to finding skeletons in Republican closets. At a Clinton victory dinner in Little Rock in 1992, Emanuel celebrated by reciting a hoped-for necrology of Democrats who had "fucked" the president-elect. After every name, he stabbed a steak knife into a table and screamed, "Dead man!"
This quote was from a story on the savior of the Democrats in the last election, the Legend of Rahm.

Rahm Emanuel, larger than life.

Saw Rahm interviewed tonight as a representative of the Democrat leadership in Congress. He had a smirk on his face as he talked about denying funding to the troops, just doling it out a month or two at a time.

We've all heard the appeal. Let me repeat it. Don't tie our troops hands. From the leaders of the VFW and the American Legion:
Not funding direct combat operations is the same as having your hands tied in a knife fight. And while some may regard the rhetoric as normal political-speak, our troops are taking it personally, because they know that not being allowed to take the fight directly to the enemy is exactly what happened in Korea and Vietnam. They don't want to repeat history.[snip]

There are finally signs of hope and progress in Iraq, and it's all because of new leadership with a new plan of action. But it's a plan that is totally dependent on a funding package for the proper training, equipping and fielding of our forces. With it, the surge has a chance of succeeding; without it, the surge is doomed to failure, and it will be the common soldier and his or her family who will pay the price.

But Rahm has a smile on his face as he knifes our troops in the back, playing politics with their lives.

I'm from Chicago, he says. I'm from Chicago.

No lifted heads here now singing with pride.

A Democrat profile in courage.


UPDATE: Someone else agrees with me, from an unexpected quarter.

Not the End of the World

Is your hair on fire yet from the eco-alarmism?!!! Take heart, a global warming rethink around the world.

Lindzen Climate Testimony before the UK House of Lords. Memorandum by Professor Richard S Lindzen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology to the UK Parliament, Select Committee on Economic Affairs:
This brings us, finally, to the issue of climate models. Essential to alarm is the fact that most current climate models predict a response to a doubling of CO2 of about 4C. The reason for this is that in these models, the most important greenhouse substances, water vapour and clouds, act in such a way as to greatly amplify the response to anthropogenic greenhouse gases alone (ie, they act as what are called large positive feedbacks). However, as all assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have stated (at least in the text—though not in the Summaries for Policymakers), the models simply fail to get clouds and water vapour right. We know this because in official model intercomparisons, all models fail miserably to replicate observed distributions of cloud cover. Thus, the model predictions are critically dependent on features that we know must be wrong.

If we nonetheless assume that these model predictions are correct (after all stopped watches are right twice a day), then man's greenhouse emissions have accounted for about six times the observed warming over the past century with some unknown processes cancelling the difference. This is distinctly less compelling than the statement that characterised the IPCC Second Assessment and served as the smoking gun for the Kyoto agreement: The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate. This is simply a short restatement of the basic agreement with the addition of a small measure of attribution. While one could question the use of the word "discernible", there is no question that human influence should exist, albeit at a level that may be so small as to actually be indiscernible. As we have already noted, however, even if all the change in global mean temperature over the past century were due to man, it would still imply low and relatively unimportant influence compared to the predictions of the models that are drawn on in IPCC reports.
Also this:
As you can see, the global warming issue parts company with normative science at a pretty early stage. A very good indicator of this disconnect is the fact that there is widespread and even rigorous scientific agreement that complete adherence to the Kyoto Agreement would have no discernible impact on climate. This clearly is of no importance to the thousands of negotiators, diplomats, regulators, general purpose bureaucrats and advocates attached to this issue.
And Der Spiegel is skeptical as well. Interesting so what? discussion.

NOT the end of the world as we know it.

Previous posts: Rats Rule, A Spoke in the Spin

NOW You Lose

Huge loss for NOW, the feminazi National Organization for Women, and a great victory for free speech and pro-life groups. Hat tip Marathon Pundit:
Tom Brejcha, lead counsel for the defendants and President of Chicago’s Thomas More Society and Pro-Life Law Center explains, "The plaintiffs designed this case as a huge dragnet and they cast it far and wide as if to encompass the entire pro-life activist movement in America. The law of 'res judicata' or 'claim preclusion' varies from state to state, but all pro-life activists who face lawsuits by their local abortion providers may have a defense based on today's final judgment. The judgment bars ‘all claims that might have been brought in this case’ on behalf of all class member abortion clinics. This is not just federal RICO or antitrust claims, but also state and local trespass or harassment claims of all sorts. As NOW and the other plaintiffs have met a final defeat, the tables are turned against them."
Barebones story in the Trib. The Thomas More Society site is here, if you'd like to give them a donation. They have fought long and hard for free speech. Bless 'em.

Related post: The Death Penalty

UIC Violates Trust

I was going to put heads should roll in the headline, but that has extra horrible connotations these days. But it does underscore the concern about preventing future school shootings, and UIC is engaging in typical bureaucratic double-speak. These "public servants" always figure they have a job for life, and they usually do. In this case they are putting our children's lives at risk, having hired and then rehired a man convicted of murder and involved in other probation violations, including keeping an extensive gun collection in his basement, supposedly his wife's. Sun Times:

But UIC officials have no plans to investigate or hold accountable any administrators who allowed him to return. Rosati declined to identify who else was responsible for Morano's return to the campus in 1999.

"I prefer not to disclose them; I'm not sure it would be constructive," Rosati said. "I don't know all of the people involved, but the names that I have heard are people who are dedicated 100 percent . . . to the safety and well-being of our community and our students -- and who make hundreds of decisions a week."

Blah, blah, blah. Maybe UIC should have more rigorous standard procedures and follow them. Obviously they can't adequately handle all those decisions. A routine background check for starters.

Rosati did not explain how the university found out that Morano had lied on his original job application or how Morano avoided being fired in 1997. Rosati emphasized that Morano was never accused of doing anything wrong around students or staff.

Still, the head of a prominent Chicago crimefighting group says UIC administrators need to be held accountable for allowing Morano to work on campus. "People who manage taxpayers' dollars have to be held to even higher standards and have to exhibit concern for the safety of the people on their property," said Jim Wagner, president of the Chicago Crime Commission. "And having an individual with this background employed in any capacity in an environment like that should be totally unacceptable."

Who protected this guy? Who is protecting UIC students?


Related post: Painful Truth

Obama Media Makeover

A little touchup, "photoshlocking" by his friends at the WaPo. Via Gateway Pundit.

Despite the star treatment, a stumble by the candidate as he stumped in Virginia.

UPDATE: Ruben Navarrette has the right idea on this, but the wrong candidate:
Fifty years from now, people will look back and they won't believe that during the 2004 presidential election -- the first since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 -- the debate in America wasn't really over the location of Osama bin Laden but over whether John Kerry was ever in Cambodia or whether George W. Bush spent the requisite amount of time in Alabama to maintain his status as a member of the Air National Guard. You would have thought we could have found something more urgent to focus on -- like how best to combat the threat of global terrorism.
Don't look to Obama for leadership on foreign policy, his thinking is muddled to put it mildly. And just because he's younger than the other candidates doesn't mean he has fresh ideas---his are recycled from the 70's. (As a Boomer I can attest to that.)

Previous post: Obama's Pastor, RINOs on the Loose

Boom and Bust

Coastal Megalopolises lose out to Interior Boomtowns. Michael Barone chronicles the shift. Native born outflows outnumber immigrant inflows to the coastal (including the Middle Coast of Chicago) cities. And the political consequences are significant:
Democratic politicians like to decry what they describe as a widening economic gap in the nation. But the part of the nation where it is widening most visibly is their home turf, the place where they win their biggest margins (these metro areas voted 61% for John Kerry) and where, in exquisitely decorated Park Avenue apartments and Beverly Hills mansions with immigrant servants passing the hors d'oeuvres, they raise most of their money.

The bad news for them is that the Coastal Megalopolises grew only 4% in 2000-06, while the nation grew 6%. Coastal Megalopolitan states--New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois--are projected to lose five House seats in the 2010 Census, while California, which has gained seats in every census since it was admitted to the Union in 1850, is projected to pick up none.
Why are people moving out if they can? In search of lower taxes. More house and space for the money. Freedom.

Chicago has slowed the shift somewhat by the growth of the South Loop which has become a university town, but the near suburbs are losing population to the exurbs and overall Cook County is losing bigtime.

The Dems tho can inflict their class warfare mentality on themselves, but we don't buy it, because everyone is getting richer. And we can leave.

Previous posts: Blue State Blues, More Elbow Room

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Mickey Mouse to Jihad


Hamas hijacks Mickey Mouse to exhort children to jihad and death. Video at LGF.

FBI Stings Jihadists

Jihad in America. WaPo:
Federal authorities in New Jersey have arrested six men who allegedly plotted for 17 months toattack the Fort Dix military base with automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades, federal officials said today.

The plan, first reported this morning by New York's WNBC television, involved four men from Albania, one from Jordan and one from Turkey, said Greg Reinert, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in New Jersey. They intended to storm the World War I-era base and kill as many military and other personnel as possible.

Charging document filed in federal court in Camden yesterday portray an ambitious and cold-blooded -- but somewhat bungling -- cadre who hoped to kill at least 100 soldiers, but also dropped training videos off at a local store to be copied, and spoke openly to a Philadelphia police sergeant about obtaining maps of Fort Dix.

Well, we can't always rely on the stupidity of terrorists. And we have to contend at home with critics of these sting tactics, those Blanche DuBois liberals who want to rely on the kindness of strangers.

At least three are here illegally, one is a citizen.

Previous posts: The Visible Jihad, I am from America

UPDATE: Tribune:
"It doesn't matter to me whether I get locked up, arrested or get taken away," a suspect identified as Serdar Tatar said in another recorded conversation. "Or I die, it doesn't matter. I'm doing it in the name of Allah."

Another suspect, Eljvir Duka, was recorded saying: "In the end, when it comes to defending your religion, when someone is trying attacks your religion, your way of life, then you go jihad." [snip]

Christie said one of the suspects worked at Super Mario's Pizza in nearby Cookstown and delivered pizzas to the base.

House Hearing on GRT Wed.

From Sen. Bill Brady:
House Hearing on Gross Receipts Tax Wednesday

House Speaker Michael Madigan has scheduled a rare Committee of the Whole meeting of the House of Representatives Wednesday morning on the Gross Receipts Tax proposed by Governor Blagojevich. The committee hearing will be at 9 a.m. Wednesday, May 9. Live audio and video coverage is available at the General Assembly's website, http://www.ilga.gov/house/audvid.asp.

There will also be a direct link to the coverage at StopRod.org.

A majority of the members of the House have already voiced their opposition to the gross receipts tax by signing on as cosponsors of House Resolution 344. A similar resolution opposing the governor's tax is being filed in the state Senate.

Madigan has expressed doubts about the governor's plan but last week told a business group in Springfield that Illinois' budget woes may require some form of tax increase this spring.
This is just the first phase in the anti-tax struggle.

Obama's Pastor

I've always thought Obama is essentially a secularist, joining a black power church in his district for its political message rather than its religious significance. (You know, kind of like belonging to the Episcopal Church. And actually I think his philosophical allies are even more unsavory.) The church's pastor is a relic of the 60's and 70's which squares with Obama's liberal voting record in Illinois and DC. So far Obama has been able to smother any hard-edged questions about his pastor by pushing him in the background on his announcement day, and smoothing it all over with his happy talk centrist campaign.

Obama has yet to really repudiate his pastor's cozying up to the terror-master Gaddafi in the past, his view that America deserved 9/11 and his essentially equating Zionism with racism, profiled in this NY Times story:
Mr. Wright, who has long prided himself on criticizing the establishment, said he knew that he may not play well in Mr. Obama’s audition for the ultimate establishment job. “If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me,” Mr. Wright said with a shrug. “I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen.
But now, it's not only some bloggers on the right who are raising the issue, it's moderate Democrats. Mickey Kaus, Slate, via RCP:
Old CW: Not Black Enough; New CW: What's All This Black Business? Tom Maguire wonders why Jodi Kantor's front-page NYT piece on Barack Obama's pastor, Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, hasn't generated more controversy. Having now read it, I tend to agree. I'd certainly be more comfortable with a presidential nominee whose main spiritual man 1) hadn't visited Col. Qaddafi (even back in '84); 2) talked less about "oppression" and "this racist United States of America;" 3) when discussing the solution to poverty, talked more about individual achievement and less about the role of "community"--including maybe even celebrating "middleclassness" instead of using it as shorthand for selfishness; 4) in general wasn't so obsessed with race.
There's more discussion and it will probably continue as the race with Hillary heats up, if not by her then by her surrogates.

Hillary was here

Hillary makes it plain she's in for the long haul, not ceding Illinois to Obama, meeting with her supporters among black ministers and at Mercy Home to court Catholics. Tribune:
Clinton, herself seeking to become the nation's first woman president, acknowledged that it will take some time for "people to get to know me" as her friends have, to conclude that she's "a person just like everybody else."

"I know that I am maybe not the most charismatic person in this race. I may not be the person that somebody immediately knows and understands is on their side," Clinton said. "But I think my track record and my lifetime of work and experience demonstrates that conclusively.
"
People do know Hillary, and what they know most don't like. But Dems may go for her because she has the gravitas to be President, unlike Barack.

Related posts: Durbin Knee Deep, Phony Folksy Hillary

"The Legend of Rahm"

Quite the lead in to "The Legend of Rahm". Chicago reporter Edward McClelland in Salon:
Election Night 2002 was a gloomy watch for Democrats. Their party, led by a pair of innocuous Midwestern Main Streeters, Richard Gephardt and Thomas Daschle, lost control of the Senate and lost seats in the House, sinking to its lowest ebb since the Roaring '20s. Smug right-wing pundits predicted the Democrats were on their way to joining the Whigs in the ashcan of American political parties.

It was a different story in Illinois. The Democrats won everything. They took the governorship for the first time in 30 years. They captured the state Senate. This despite running a ticket made up of ward bosses' children and in-laws. I remember sitting on my couch in Chicago and thinking, "If the Democrats want to turn it around, they need to take some lessons from the machine around here. Chicago Democrats have no scruples. They treat political offices as feudal inheritances. They shake down contributors like a corrupt pope selling indulgences. They're sleazy, they're arrogant … and they WIN."

And when Republicans act like Democrats---corrupt and cocky---they lose everything, as they did in Illinois then and in Congress in 2006.

More on Rahm:

That night, on the northwest side, Rahm Emanuel was elected to Congress. A former Clinton whiz kid who'd gotten his start as a fundraiser for Mayor Richard M. Daley, Emanuel was connected -- in the three years after leaving the White House (where he'd helped push through NAFTA), he earned $16 million putting together Wall Street mergers. He was also zealously partisan. He had once owned a consulting business devoted to finding skeletons in Republican closets. At a Clinton victory dinner in Little Rock in 1992, Emanuel celebrated by reciting a hoped-for necrology of Democrats who had "fucked" the president-elect. After every name, he stabbed a steak knife into a table and screamed, "Dead man!"
Oh yeah, there's a new book out on Rahm by an admiring Tribune reporter. This review mentions Rahm is a product of Wilmette. Some may wish to lay claim to him, but I wouldn't be among them. He lived here starting in junior high, growing up in Chicago, though the "growing up" part is questionable too.

Smart, hungry for power and unprincipled, that's Rahm. Liberal bloggers agree with that characterization and worry about the tenuous majority Democrats won with their liberal wolf in moderate sheep's clothing approach. The navel-gazing worriers of the Left. They should worry. We'll see how this all plays out with the American people. Fierce at home, craven abroad. Rahm and the Democrats.

Related posts: Rahm's Overreach, Vulture Politics, A Few Questions for Rahm

The Fertile Heartland

We have our values, we have our dreams. We have children. Nicholas Eberstadt, WaPo:
The single most important factor in explaining America's high fertility level these days is the birthrate of the country's "Anglo" majority, who still account for roughly 55 percent of U.S. births. [snip]

The main explanation for the U.S.-European fertility gap may lie not in material factors but in the seemingly ephemeral realm of values, ideals, attitudes and outlook. In striking contrast to Western Europe, which is provocatively (but not unfairly) described as a "post-Christian" territory these days, religion is alive and well in the United States. It is not hard to imagine how the religiosity gap between America and Europe translates into a fertility gap. Unfortunately, the hypothesis is devilishly difficult to explore. There are virtually no official national data for the United States that would permit a rigorous testing of the hypothesis that America's religiosity is directly related to its childbearing. For the time being, at least, this religion-fertility proposition must be treated as speculation.
Speculation perhaps, but the Roe Effect is undoubtedly a factor. The numbers of children per family are down from the 50's and 60's, but will still help ease the needed reform of Social Security, no thanks to the feminazis.

Galapagos George


Jane Austen meets Galapagos George. The intrepid John Tierney on the travails of a turtle (pix by Laurie Rosenwald):
It is a truth universally acknowledged, at least among humans, that a giant tortoise in the possession of the last sperm of his species must be in want of a wife. But what if the tortoise prefers a different lifestyle?

When I met Lonesome George two decades ago, in his pen on the main island of the Galápagos, I had the usual impulse to fix up the world’s most famous bachelor.
Fascinating story which does not yet have an ending. Will George find true love or retreat into his shell?

Monday, May 07, 2007

Onward Christian Cubans

The Catholic church in Cuba has stopped the publication of a brave and influential little Catholic magazine, Vitral. The bishop who shepherded its founding has retired and the church leadership is yielding to pressure from the Castro regime. Mary Anastasia O'Grady, "Onward Christian Cubans" WSJ:
Under Bishop González's care, Pinar del Rio became a problem for the regime. The diocese regularly prayed for the many political prisoners on the island, and voiced open concern about the country's wretched economic circumstances. The bishop also protected Mr. Valdes who, writing in Vitral, broached touchy subjects like democracy and plurality. In his parting shots in the April edition, the Vitral editor complained about Cuba's "anachronistic economic measures," the "violation of worker rights," and the isolation of the people, who are not permitted to travel around or leave the island.

There was one more thing Bishop González did in Pinar del Rio that did not ingratiate him with the owners of the slave plantation known as Cuba. He openly supported Mr. Paya's Varela Project, which accumulated more than 10,000 signatures on a petition calling for free elections. This linked the province's Catholics to the island's wider Christian movement clamoring for peaceful, democratic change. The movement grew even stronger last month when Mr. Paya and dissident leader Marta Beatriz Roque, who had been previously estranged, signed a unity pact, along with other opposition leaders.

More on Vitral here. For a free Cuba.

Related posts: Communist Chic, The Real Island Prison

Latest on Cook County

At least one Cook County commissioner wants to keep the public in the dark about the battle between those who oppose the Toddler's wasteful spending and nepotism and those who are propping him up. The Sun Times editorial disagrees "Keep county's cartoon funhouse on TV".

The RJC is sponsoring an event with Cook County Commissioner Tony Peraica this Wednesday for the latest at the historic Pritzger Military Library:

Unwind after work and socialize while viewing the priceless military memorabilia at the Priztker Military Library. After enjoying appetizers and drinks, we are privileged to have Cook County Commissioner Tony Peraica update us as to the current state of county government and his efforts to fight the rampant corruption of the Stroger administration.

Wednesday, May 9

Kosher Appetizers, Cocktails and library viewing: 6:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Program to start at: 7:30 pm.

Pritzker Military Library
610 N. Fairbanks Court 2nd Floor
Chicago IL 60011
312-587-0234 Library phone
www.pritzkermilitarylibrary.org

$10 for current paid RJC Members and students
$25 non-members
Includes admission, Kosher appetizers and cocktails

RSVP is required
Email Dr. Michael Menis at rjcchicago@gmail.com
or call 815-459-7400

Do Nothing Durbin

Dennis Byrne on Sen. Dick Durbin.

Related posts: Durbin and Dems Disgrace, Losing the Future

Fred Thompson Introduced

Fred Thompson says a number of sensible things. Text of his Orange County speech via RCP. And hometown talk from The Tennessean.

RINOs on the Loose

"Republicans defect to the Obama camp", Times' story by Sarah Baxter. A bunch of RINOs on the loose. (Well, I couldn't find a pix with a donkey, so did the best I could. Looks like they've already started feeding at the public trough.) What else is new. Guess they were worried about becoming roadkill, dithering in the center.

And this final bit is really ridiculous:
For his optimism about the future, Obama has been dubbed the “black Ronald Reagan”. He frequently challenges the black community to support two-parent families and encourage school students, instead of criticising them for “acting white”.
We are to believe Obama is to the hard left of Hillary on the war, but really a JFK bear any burden kind of guy overall on foreign policy (no inconsistency there) and that he's to the right on social issues?!!! Fine. Nice talk the centrist talk, but Obama is a huge liberal on his votes, in Illinois and Washington. And he's never managed anything other than his own campaign so he has no track record of governance. Where he's had the chance to support what even begins to approach reform candidates in his own Dem machine backyard here, he's declined to stick his neck out. Not to mention his milking the corrupt contributions cow for all its worth. Has Obama ever seen a tax he doesn't like? No Reagan mantra there.

So pardon me for a little skepticism. Pardon me for thinking this centrist happy talk is a little cynical. And I'll only even start to begin to give a glimmer of consideration to the Reaganesque moniker when Obama comes out for across the board tax cuts, school choice, any restrictions at all on abortion (despite his paying lipservice to religion. No changed view due to the recent Supreme Court ruling) and refers to Iran, Syria and their terrorist friends Hamas and Hezbollah as an evil Islamo-fascist empire (rather than expressing sympathy for terrorists and then lying about it.) And then actually walks the walk on this stuff. (No piglets launching overhead yet.)

A RINO defection is no indication of Obama's "appeal to conservatives". Only the "New Yorker" could think that. (Yes, the perfect magazine illustrative of Obama, highflown, prosing on in a gauzy, self-absorbed literary haze, freighted with Deep Significance. The author's mandatory Comparisons to Lincoln, (prefaced by admiring remarks by a U of C professor who defended Bill Clinton's behavior in the Oval Office):
Obama has staked his candidacy on union—on bringing together two halves of America that are profoundly divided, and by associating himself with Lincoln—and he knows what both of those things mean. He calls America’s founding a “grand compromise”: compromise, for him, is not an eroding of principle for the sake of getting something done but a principle in itself—the certainty of uncertainty, the fundament of union.
?! How precious, but what does it mean?) ( Scroll down if you want a New Yorker snotty description of people from the Midwest waiting to see Obama. Maybe a few stray RINOs in there.) He's not a conservative, he's a status-quo liberal Dem, clinging to the failed big-government policies of the past. And when he thinks he needs to be, he's a deal-maker. He's a liberal in love with the sound of his own voice who doesn't stick his neck out for his principles.

RINOs are not conservatives, they're the last vestige of country club Republicanism, vintage Nelson Rockefeller and a bit of Bush père. (Good riddance to their patronizing tax collectors for the welfare state mentality.) Conservatives will support Obama when pigs fly.

And as far as herding some politically simple-minded RINOs to the Dems, there are some DINOs, at least on the issue of the war on terror, who know the world is no country club.


Previous posts: O'Bama Roundup, Obama Ethics Slip

UPDATE: Sweet, also here. A flex-fuel car for the campaign? Put-put.

QubeTV, Right Wing News

Now conservatives have an alternative to YouTube, which has been known for some biased censorship. It's called QubeTV. And premier interviewer John Hawkins of RightWingNews added to blogroll. One of his great recent columns, "10 More Differences Between Conservatives and Liberals".

Rats Rule

Draconian eco-measures in the UK, driven by global warming hysteria in the EU. Is this the future here? Lionel Shriver, WSJ:
Pressed to meet European Union targets for reducing landfill volume, many local councils now collect refuse only once every two weeks. As flies and vermin gather while food scraps achieve a fine perfume, residents have grown so enraged that bin-men are under repeated physical attack. [snip]

Halving the frequency of waste removal conveniently saves money. A host of other new "green" measures in the U.K. will make money: $200 fines for poorly separated recycling, or microchips implanted in wheelie bins to weigh residential refuse -- dragging Britain's surveillance culture to a new low, and facilitating charges for waste disposal by the kilo. Furious that they are already paying once for this service through local taxes, some householders have ripped the microchips from their bins.

The premier example of having to pay twice for the same dispensation, all under the guise of environmentalism, is the British government's proposal to bring in "road pricing," unveiled last December. This literal highway robbery would charge motorists up to $2.56 per mile to drive on roads whose construction they had paid for to begin with. Announcement of the scheme stirred the complacent, slow-to-anger British public to circulate an Internet protest petition that secured 1.8 million signatures.

Mark Steyn on the selective civil libertarian outrage on the Left and some implications for human progress.

Will rats rule?

(I would put up a pix of rats but I can't make myself do it.)

Meanwhile, contrarian observations are piling up on global warming being man-made. In addition to the not man-made Mars ice melt, others planets are melting as well. A very informative piece by Tom Bethell "Global Warming in Space" in the May issue of the American Spectator (print edition). Here's a key phrase that explains why this issue has become so easily politicized:

"Climatology is a generalist discipline in an age of specialists". Here's a key paragraph: A new book, Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future, notes the failure of mathematical models to predict changes in coastal geology. The modelers too freely apply fixed values to quantities that vary all the time, the authors say. If they didn't, their equations would become excessively complex, they wouldn't be able to predict much of anything, and they wouldn't attract media attention.
Rats!

UPDATE: He was the first director of Sen. Earth Day Gaylord Nelson's (D-WI) Institute of Environmental Studies at the UW, established back in the 70's (I was a Senate intern in Nelson's office in the summer of '74). Before that, Dr. Reid A. Bryson, now 86, founded the Meteorology Dept. at UW, now the Dept. of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science. Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News:
Bryson is a believer in climate change, in that he’s as quick as anyone to acknowledge that Earth’s climate has done nothing but change throughout the planet’s existence. In fact, he took that knowledge a big step further, earlier than probably anyone else. Almost 40 years ago, Bryson stood before the American Association for the Advancement of Science and presented a paper saying human activity could alter climate.

“I was laughed off the platform for saying that,” he told Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News.

In the 1960s, Bryson’s idea was widely considered a radical proposition. But nowadays things have turned almost in the opposite direction: Hardly a day passes without some authority figure claiming that whatever the climate happens to be doing, human activity must be part of the explanation. And once again, Bryson is challenging the conventional wisdom.

“Climate’s always been changing and it’s been changing rapidly at various times, and so something was making it change in the past,” he told us in an interview this past winter. “Before there were enough people to make any difference at all, two million years ago, nobody was changing the climate, yet the climate was changing, okay?”

“All this argument is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd,” Bryson continues. “Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.”

We're just getting back to the norms of when Greenland was Greenland. And this:

Q: Could you rank the things that have the most significant impact and where would you put carbon dioxide on the list?

A: Well let me give you one fact first. In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, on the average, outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay?

Q: Eighty percent of the heat radiated back from the surface is absorbed in the first 30 feet by water vapor…

A: And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.

Sunday, May 06, 2007

Sarko Saves France

Sarko saves France with a win. No Paseran with updates on the "youth" response. A little perspective, via No Paseran, Denis Boyles a few days ago:
The Euro-press’s morose mantra is that Sarkozy is mean, a nationalist, a populist — the terms usually reserved for Jean-Marie Le Pen, but now directed against the Gaullist, who, on an American spectrum, would be seen as a moderate Democrat, but in France is viewed as “radical conservative” to use Bremner’s delicate phraseology. To the BBC’s World Service, Sarko’s simply a “rightwinger” — but then to the World Service, who isn’t?
Ah yes, he's supposedly a conservative. Also here. The Times: “
The French have chosen to break with the ideas, habits and behaviour of the past,” he said. “I will restore the value of work, authority, merit and respect for the nation.”

He would also rid France of its habit of “repenting” for its past historical sins. “This repentance is a form of self-hatred,” he said.

Mr Sarkozy offered friendship to the United States, but urged Washington to act urgently on climate change. He also warned fellow European leaders that he expected them to join him in making the Union more protective.

“It must not be the Trojan horse for globalisation’s ills,” he said.

By choosing Mr Sarkozy, France turned a deaf ear to the warnings of Ms Royal and much of the left that his muscular plans for restoring the work ethic, cutting welfare and fighting crime would lead to violence and even insurrection.

He won despite advocating an "un-French" philosophy "Work more to earn more". What a concept. A clean break from ruinous socialist abstraction.

UPDATE: Financial Times, via RCP:

Some left-wing militants threaten to conduct the third round of the presidential elections on the street and to resist his legislative programme.

Mr Sarkozy still needs to form a majority in parliament after June’s legislative elections before he can make good on his promises.

Yet Christine Lagarde, the trade minister expected to retain a prominent government role, is confident he can succeed saying the trade unions will not be able to “hold the country hostage” as they have in the past.

“The majority [of voters] have said they want reforms. While trying to accommodate everyone, he will deliver on those reforms,” she says. “He is not a weak character.”

UPDATE: France's new First Lady:

Cecilia Sarkozy, whose husband Nicolas was elected Sunday as France's new president, is a fiercely independent former model and PR executive unlikely to fit easily into the discreet role of first lady.

"I don't see myself as a first lady. It bores me. I prefer going round in combat trousers and cowboy boots. I don't fit the mould," the elegant 49-year-old brunette has said.

UPDATE: I break out some champagne. American, but it's the thought that counts. The first time in some time we can feel good about the French.

Previous post: The Young and Restless

Burqa Babes on the Net

Disturbing story of young women taking off their burqas and more on the net, a perverse seeking of the freedom they are not allowed in a repressive society. Yet more opportunity to exploit women in the Middle East. A Lebanese TV report translated by MEMRI. At LGF.

Related post: Iran the Great Satan, The Sublime Quran

Discover the Network


Rezko splashed across the front page Saturday of both major Chicago papers. Discovering the network, digging down to the nitty gritty. Tribune, "Developer was mole for feds":

Records made public so far do not identify the targets of the federal probe, and the FBI and U.S. attorney's office declined to comment for this article.

But the case could send ripples through Chicago's huge financial and real estate industries because Thomas' business clients and associates include several well-known commercial and residential developers.

Among them is Rezmar Corp., which was run by Antoin "Tony" Rezko, the politically-connected entrepreneur who pleaded not guilty last fall after being indicted on federal influence-peddling and fraud charges.
"Feds sic mole on Rezko" Sun Times:

When Mahru was a partner with Rezko, their company -- Rezmar Corp. -- was helped by Thomas' Carnegie Realty Partners to obtain financing to build a 24-story condominium complex at Chicago and Hudson, a project that ultimately did not get off the ground.

The financial institution that backed that deal was Broadway Bank, which is owned by the family of state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias. Elected in the Democratic sweep last year, Giannoulias has had to answer criticism over loans his bank made to reputed crime figures.

"Carnegie brought us to Broadway," Mahru said, and introduced him to Giannoulias' father.
And Alexi Giannoulias of Broadway Bank was one of Obama's biggest backers, besides Rezko that is.

In turn, Obama backed Giannoulias for the state Treasurer slot, despite the lingering questions, rather than the Downstate candidate backed by the party regulars.

Amended Thinking on the 2nd

A dawn of strict constructionism on the 2nd amendment that cannot be denied. Even the NY Times can't ignore it. New adherents include liberal Harvard Law professor Lawrence Tribe, Yale Law professor Akhil Reed Amar, and Professor Sanford Levinson, UT. Via RCP:
The earlier consensus, the law professors said in interviews, reflected received wisdom and political preferences rather than a serious consideration of the amendment’s text, history and place in the structure of the Constitution. “The standard liberal position,” Professor Levinson said, “is that the Second Amendment is basically just read out of the Constitution.”

The Second Amendment says, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Some transcriptions of the amendment omit the last comma.)

If only as a matter of consistency, Professor Levinson continued, liberals who favor expansive interpretations of other amendments in the Bill of Rights, like those protecting free speech and the rights of criminal defendants, should also embrace a broad reading of the Second Amendment. And just as the First Amendment’s protection of the right to free speech is not absolute, the professors say, the Second Amendment’s protection of the right to keep and bear arms may be limited by the government, though only for good reason.

D.C.'s draconian gun restrictions, which have had no discernible impact on the murder rate, have been challenged in the courts:

If the full United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit does not step in and reverse the 2-to-1 panel decision striking down a law that forbids residents to keep handguns in their homes, the question of the meaning of the Second Amendment is almost certainly headed to the Supreme Court. The answer there is far from certain.
It's a clearer-cut case in one respect since there are no state laws to govern D.C. and it goes straight to the federal courts for consideration. And it's not a slam-dunk left-right issue, as two sitting justices, Souter and Ginsberg, usually on the Left voted with Scalia in a dissenting opinion the last time a similar case came up on the previous Supreme Court.

This issue is not of mere academic interest in Wilmette, which also has a local ban and has had legal challenges of its own arising from home invasions.

Previous post: The Right of Self-Defense

Friday, May 04, 2007

I don't know if I can watch it

I haven't watched the video yet, don't know if I can, but here is the gruesome story of a Kurdish teenage girl who was stoned to death.

Bahai in Spring


The Bahai Temple in Wilmette, voted one of Illinois' Seven Wonders.

Cinco De Mayo


Cinco De Mayo GOP style. Former party chairman Ken Mehlman "Hispanic outreach crucial to GOP".

Party time:
The RNHA of Cook County in conjunction with the Chicago Young Republicans are hosting the best Cinco De Mayo celebration at RUMBA.

Saturday May 5, from 7-9 we have an open bar at RUMBA, 351 W. Hubbard
$30 for members / $35 for non-members Dancing afterwards - LIVE BAND

Come and dance the night away at one of Chicago's hottest salsa venues in a fusion of cultures, music and best of all, people! Based on the track record of previous YR and RNHA this promises to be a blockbuster!

Check out RUMBA at Metromix

Solving Poverty

Another thought-provoking, simply elegant essay by Arnold Kling, TCS Daily, via RCP:
The point of this essay is to simply state the obvious. If you look at poverty from the broad perspective of international and historical comparisons, the solution to poverty is decentralized entrepreneurial activity under capitalism.

The capitalist solution to poverty is unsatisfying to many people, because it is not planned or intended. Policymakers and anti-poverty programs per se are not involved.

The phenomenon of unplanned results exceeding planned outcomes is quite widespread. As Nassim Taleb points out in his new book The Black Swan, and in this fascinating interview, human planning tends to work poorly when compared to trial and error. He argues, for example, that many medical discoveries are serendipitous, while systematic efforts such as those of the National Cancer Institute often yield disappointing results.

Link to the book here. Kling suggests focusing on outcomes, which has proved successful in practice.

Related posts: The World Explained ,Room to Read, The Lemonade Stand Approach to Politics

Bolshevik Tactics

They lose the election. Now they're planning to storm the Reichstag and set it on fire ...(they would set it on fire, only they're worried about Kyoto).

Advocating mob rule to thwart the will of the majority-- Bolshevik tactics in Wilmette. Pulling off the mask and revealing their contempt for democracy.

(Emphasis mine in the key paragraph below)

Sent: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:18 PM
Subject: Housing Alert: Wilmette, Tues., May 8

Dear Wilmette residents, religious leaders, and business leaders,

The support of each and every one of you is needed to pass new, important affordable housing programs and policies! Come to the next meeting of the Wilmette Village Board, Tues., 5/8, at 7:30 pm. If you haven't already done so, "sign" the attached letter of support for affordable housing in Wilmette being circulated by Wilmette Citizens for Affordable Housing .


At last, the hard work of the Finance Committee of the Village is moving toward action. This committee, headed by Trustee Lali Watt and additionally comprising Trustees Joanne Aggens and Mari Terman, is presenting its recommendations to the Village Board. Recall that this committee also conclude a survey of nearly 1,000 public and private employees in the Village and definitively established, by income level and family size, their interest in living in the Village. These recommendations will include the creation of a Wilmette affordable housing trust fund, a Wilmette community land trust to leverage these funds into the creation or preservation of affordable units, and what's likely to be a hybrid, multi-source method to capitalize the trust fund.

As you can see from the message below from Ed Miller and Celia Muench of Wilmette Citizens for Affordable Housing, there's an especially strong feeling of concern because May 8 is the last meeting of two trustees (Joanne Aggens and Jim Griffith) who have been especially passionate proponents of a Village role in the stewardship of housing.

Please come on 5/8 to urge passage of these initiatives, thank the Finance Committee, and let all trustees know that Wilmette has a solid base of support for affordable housing. It's the right thing to do!

Bring your friends, family members, co-workers. Tell your stories.
We need you.

Thank you,
Gail

Gail Schechter
Executive Director
Interfaith Housing Center of the Northern Suburbs
620 Lincoln Ave.
Winnetka, IL 60093
Phone: 847-501-5762, ext. 406
Fax: 847-501-5722


Dear Friends,

As you may know, only one of our affordable housing candidates, Mari Terman, was elected to the Village Board of Trustees. We are sad to say that Joanne Aggens, our other candidate, lost by 319 votes.Spillers and Basil, the new trustees, have already expressed their opposition to affordable housing.

We are disappointed because Joanne was one of the most committed trustees in favor of affordable housing and was a tireless fighter for the cause. She will be missed. We have invited her to join us and continue the advocacy for affordable housing in Wilmette. I am sure that we will have her support.

Thank you for all of YOUR support! And we need you NOW more than ever!

Next Tuesday, May 8 at 7:30 p.m.in the Village Hall, the Village Board of Trustees will be receiving the final report of the Finance Committee on Affordable Housing. The recommendations include the establishment of an Affordable Housing Trust Fund, an Affordable Housing Land Trust and a Community Challenge Grant where the Village of Wilmette would match $500,000 raised by the community.

This is the LAST meeting of the existing Board of Trustees. Jim Griffith and Joanne Aggens, both big supporters of affordable housing, will be voting members for the last time. We need to show up in LARGE numbers to let the trustees know that the community supports the recommendations of the Finance Committee.

At next Tuesday's meeting, Wilmette Citizens for Affordable Housing will be presenting the letter of thanks to the Finance Committee that you recently "signed". We will also provide the Board with some business and environmental reasons for having affordable housing in Wilmette.

Please come on Tuesday night and bring other Wilmette residents and/or community leaders to this critical meeting.

Thanks again for your support!


Ed and Celia
Wilmette Citizens for Affordable Housing

Board link here.(link down at time of post) Agenda for Tuesday, May 8th Board Meeting should show up here sometime today.

UPDATE: Jog your memory on MOLD FEST and assorted other schemes. Related earlier post, A Fruitless Effort

UPDATE: Post by the Wilmette Blog

UPDATE: Email:
Last week I was in the Village Hall seeking a fence permit when I encountered a delegation from the Atrium Apartments. The group was seeking answers to a problem at the Atrium, and had been upstairs and was then sent to Community Development. They looked, and sounded, frustrated. These seniors were literally being given the run-around.

Wilmette has yet to resolve the issues which developed from its support of the Atrium Apartments. The Village of Wilmette should not consider sponsorship of an even larger "affordable" housing program until it can manage the housing program it has in place.

Mary Louise O'Reilly
UPDATE: Email:
I am a frustrated Wilmette resident and have chewed around the corners of Wilmette politics for a long time. I first moved to Wilmette in 1976 at age 10 and recently moved back 4 yrs ago. While I am frustrated by the Village Trustees, I was happy to see the election of Karen Spillers and Mike Basil - the continued use of the trustee position to promote personal agendas was voted down by voters now that Joanne Aggens and Jim Griffith have lost their seats.

I saw your affordable housing blog and am infuriated by the use of my (taxpayer) money to support someone else's agenda. I have been preaching to whomever will listen that Mallinckrodt is a gross misuse of Wilmette's bond rating and the continued insistence by the board to regulate my personal property is against a taking of my property without just compensation. It seems that the voters are tired of it too and I am hopeful that the new board will begin to focus on what is really important to Wilmette on May 22nd.

Power for Lunch

Power for lunch, pork and fraud on the menu.

Will Jan bring her husband? Will Geraldine bring hers?

Will DiFi be there and bring hers?

And will Nancy wear her headscarf, in case there are any stray murderous dictators around to suck up to?

I suppose it's an improvement over last year.

Painful Truth

(This was sent to me by a friend. I checked it out, it is authentic, (also here) testimony given on May 27, 1999, to the House Judiciary subcommittee on crime after the Columbine school massacre. Very poignant given recent events, which is why I reprint it now. Darrell Scott continues to honor his daughter's memory with the Rachel's Challenge foundation.)

"Since the dawn of creation there has been both good & evil in the hearts of men and women. We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher, and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries out for answers." "The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field.

The villain was not the club he used. Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain's heart. "In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA.

I am not a member of the NRA. I am not a hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA - because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death. Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent."

"I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy-it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here in this room.

Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves. "I wrote a poem that expresses my feelings best. This was written way before I knew I would be speaking here today:"

Your laws ignore our deepest needs,
Your words are empty air.
You've stripped away our heritage,
You've outlawed simple prayer.

Now gunshots fill our classrooms,
And precious children die.
You seek for answers everywhere,
And ask the question "Why?"

You regulate restrictive laws,
Through legislative creed.
And yet you fail to understand,
That God is what we need!

"Men and women are three-part beings. We all consist of body, soul, and spirit. When we refuse to acknowledge a third part of our make-up, we create a void that allows evil, prejudice, and hatred to rush in and reek havoc. Spiritual influences were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history. Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a historical fact.

What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs politicians immediately look for a scapegoat such as the NRA. They immediately seek to pass more restrictive laws that contribute to erode away our personal and private liberties.

We do not need more restrictive laws." Eric and Dylan would not have been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our own hearts.

Political posturing and restrictive legislation are not the answers. The young people of our nation hold the key. There is a spiritual awakening taking place that will not be squelched! We do not need more religion. We do not need more gaudy television evangelists spewing out verbal religious garbage. We do not need more million dollar church buildings built while people with basic needs are being ignored.

We do need a change of heart and a humble acknowledgment that this nation was founded on the principle of simple trust in God!" "As my son Craig lay under that table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very eyes, He did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to deny him that right!

I challenge every young person in America, and around the world, to realize that on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School prayer was brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate with Him. To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA- I give to you a sincere challenge.

Dare to examine your own heart before casting the first stone! My daughter's death will not be in vain! The young people of this country will not allow that to happen!"


And here's the crux---if liberals don't want to view this issue in a faith context, that man has a capacity for good or evil, then they have to admit that those suffering from severe mental illness have a greater capacity for violence. They can't have it both ways. That's the painful truth.

Related posts: Commitment Phobia, The Acceptable Bigotry, The Coming PC Crack-up

UPDATE: Steve Chapman, Tribune:
Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said the organization supports measures to assure that mental health records get into the federal database.

"Our position on this is crystal clear: If you are adjudicated by a court to be mentally defective, suicidal, a danger to yourself or to others, you should be prohibited from buying a firearm," he told Newsweek.

You might think that if you can persuade the NRA to endorse a restriction on gun ownership, you can persuade anyone. But the McCarthy bill drew fierce opposition from another group: those claiming to advocate for the mentally ill.
Read it all.

Islam vs. Islamists

The film PBS doesn't want you to see. Voices from the Muslim Center. Trailer at HotAir.

Previous posts: Step Forward, Liberals , The Disgrace that is PBS

Targeting Schoolgirls

Al Qaeda in Iraq targets schoolgirls. Cliff May, The Corner, NRO.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

Debate & the Reagan Diaries

Watched the debate. (Horrible shock to see Olberman as the lead-in, what a snarky guy he is. And with Chris Matthews hosting a debate it's a wonder anyone can get a word in edgewise.) Romney helped himself, Giuliani did Ok, as did McCain. The setting at the Reagan Library made me nostalgic so here's RedState with excerpts of the Reagan Diaries and further link to more at Vanity Fair.

(P.S. I liked this comment from blogger California Conservative, which gives the flavor of Matthew's questions:
It's funny how framing changes everything. Instead of asking "Will you continue Bush's legacy on tax cuts, economic growth, support for unborn children, and conservative judicial appointments?" The question is, "Should Bush be executed or merely impeached?"

If only Chris Matthews was willing to ask questions like this to Hillary. My first question to Hillary would be, "As president, would you return to the policy of looking the other way every time terrorists attack U.S. targets?"

The Clintons don't like to talk about national security because it has never been a priority for them.

Commitment Phobia

E. Fuller Torrey, a doctor and author on "Commitment Phobia", WSJ:
The question inevitably follows the carnage at Virginia Tech: Are individuals with severe mental illnesses more dangerous than the general population? Since the 1960s, when the emptying of public mental hospitals went on fast forward, this question has recurred with each publicized psychiatric tragedy. And each time, mental health organizations have replied with an identical mantra: Psychiatric patients are not more dangerous than the general population.

This answer may be politically correct, but it is factually incorrect. To be precise, mentally ill individuals who are taking medication to control the symptoms of their illness are not more dangerous. But on any given day, approximately half of severely mentally ill individuals are not taking medication. The evidence is clear that a portion of these individuals are significantly more dangerous. [snip]

Specifically regarding homicides, a 1985 study in Contra Costa County, Calif., found that individuals with severe mental illnesses were responsible for 10% of homicides. Multiple European studies have reported a range from 5% to 18%. Using the most conservative estimate of 5% for the United States, individuals with severe mental illness would have been responsible for 885 of the 16,192 total homicides in 2005. And if this 5% were applied to all homicides in the U.S. between 1966, when deinstitutionalization got underway, and 2005, the total would be 37,969 homicides. Most of these would not have happened if the perpetrators had been receiving treatment.

We desperately need a rethink on this issue before another tragedy happens.

Previous posts: Overreaction or Not?, Sad Thoughts

Forum on Gross Receipts Tax

A first thing in the morning gathering on the GROSS Receipts TAX tomorrow, Friday, May 4, 2007; 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.(refreshments will be served). AFP:
ROLLING MEADOWS – The Illinois chapter of the grassroots free-market group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) in partnership with the Illinois Chamber of Commerce and the Illinois Coalition for Jobs, Growth and Prosperity, will host a citizen forum to discuss Governor Blagojevich’s proposed gross receipts tax on Friday, May 4, at the Park Central Park District building in Rolling Meadows. The event will feature expert panelists, including State Senator Mat Murphy and Americans for Prosperity national Policy Director Phil Kerpen.

Kerpen, who recently weighed in against the Governor’s ill-conceived tax hike plan for the
Chicago Tribune’s opinion page, will discuss why the Governor’s proposed gross receipts tax would result in a huge price hike for consumers and strike a one-two punch to the Illinois economy. Kerpen will also provide a larger national perspective on gross receipts taxes.
And in a related opinion piece in the WSJ, Leo Melamed, chairman emeritus of the Merc on America's need to meet new competitive challenges:
To remain competitive in the 21st century, the U.S. must first accept the reality of the modern global paradigm. We cannot pretend or assume that things will ever again be as they were. In the future, our private sector will have to fight for business flows on a world stage. It will require our best efforts and brightest minds. Similarly, U.S. government officials must accept the fact that U.S. businesses face competitors from across the ocean rather than across the river.

The old road map is history. The new map necessitates continued deregulation to promote continued innovation, reduction of burdensome compliance costs, containment of baseless litigation and open markets for goods. Beyond that, we must redouble our efforts to sustain the academic excellence that helped give us our first-mover advantage in the first place.

Let's not let Illinois fall behind.

O'Bama Roundup

Well, it's official, Obama of the gift of gab comes by it naturally courtesy of his mom's family roots in Ireland. Sun Times here.

Tribune on Obama's record of pork in the Illinois statehouse:
During his nearly eight years in Springfield, he tucked special earmarks into massive budget bills to shower small bequests on inner city schools, parks and youth service agencies.

But some of the larger grants Obama sponsored were tied to political allies and show how difficult it is even for politicians advocating reform to avoid the appearance of favoritism as they dole out taxpayer funds. Several non-profit directors, for instance, gave money to Obama's campaigns soon after their allotments were awarded.
WaPo on Obama's tough love tack with Black America.

Previous post: Obama Ethics Slip

UPDATE: The Swamp on polling, Sweet on Camp Obama.

First Republican Debate

Debate tonight on MSNBC, at the Reagan Library. Latest polling Hugh Hewitt here. RCP blog here.

UPDATE: John Fund, WSJ on the shadow candidates:
Playing hard-to-get also creates allure and curiosity. Today noncandidates appeal to both parties. Depending on the poll, between one-third and three-fifths of Republicans are dissatisfied with their current crop of candidates. Last month, a straw poll at the Oklahoma Republican Party's convention saw noncandidates Fred Thompson and Newt Gingrich top the field with a majority of the votes between them. Democrats are more happy with their field, but persistent doubts about Hillary Clinton's electability or Barack Obama's seasoning fuels speculation that Al Gore or some other savior will enter the race. [snip]

Mr. Thompson, whose movies and network appearances are a fixture on TV screens, is clearly being helped for now by not being part of the candidate pack. The day after tonight's GOP debate he will appear before a large GOP audience in Orange County, 75 miles south of the Reagan Library. C-Span and CNN will cover the event live. His solo act may get as many viewers as tonight's debate. Pollsters John Zogby and Doug Schoen both agree that Mr. Thompson could shake up the GOP race.

The World Explained


One of my friends tipped me off to this talk with amazing animated software, bringing statistics alive and dispelling myths about the developing world. Developed by doctor and researcher Hans Rosling and his Gapminder Foundation. The Trendalyzer software has been acquired by Google.

The world explained. The underlying lesson that comes through is free minds and free markets generate the wealth and health of the world.

U of I Stiffs Vets Update

My friend John Ruberry, Marathon Pundit has followed up with more in-depth investigative reporting on the University of Illinois denial of promised scholarships to veterans. Initial post here. Latest here.

We Win, They Lose

Coloring the News

From NewsBusters:
Time magazine's Joe Klein is no exception. The journalist and formerly anonymous author of "Primary Colors" shared with readers of the "Swampland" blog today his complaints about a Bush administration that "trafficks" in publicity stunts such as the May 1, 2003, carrier landing. Klein went on to complain that Donald Rumsfeld was the worst Secretary of Defense in the history of the Republic who, along with "the spinners who gave us the Abraham Lincoln stunt" should be "emptying bed pans at Walter Reed."

Klein's ire draws from liberal talking points about the four-year old "major combat operations" speech. You know the meme "Mission Accomplished" and an end of "major combat operations" were impossibly rosy scenarios in light of the ongoing insurgency.

But for the record, Klein himself described the war as having been won shortly after President Bush's USS Abraham Lincoln speech.

I look forward to Klein's sequel on Hillary. For sure.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Options for Women

According to the Boston Globe, women are dropping off the partnership track. Why is this news? The main reason cited is that they are having children and find it difficult to work such long hours, while arranging to care properly for their children.

This should not be a surprise to anyone. And women are choosing to opt out:
THE United States Bureau of Labor Statistics recently published its long-awaited study, ''Trends in Labor Force Participation of Married Mothers of Infants.'' ''In recent years,'' the number crunchers reported, ''the labor force participation of married mothers, especially those with young children, has stopped its advance.''

Sixty percent of married mothers of preschool children are now in the work force, four percentage points fewer than in 1997. The rate for married mothers of infants fell by about six percentage points, to 53.5 percent. The bureau further reports that the declines ''have occurred across all educational levels and, for most groups, by about the same magnitude.''

In sum, sometime well before the 2000 recession, wives with infants and toddlers began leaving the work force. And they stayed out even after the economy began to revive.

What's going on? We have to explain this to feminists, as even faced with the facts and human nature they refuse to take it in.

Feminists have been beating this pay-gap dead horse with a blunt instrument for over 20 years, using the same crude numbers, pushing the same tired old myth on "equal pay day". For an example, here's a piece by one of these aging feminists.

When I was in business school in the early '80's I remember we discussed the supposed pay gap in class. Much of it disappeared after adjusting for differences in experience and career interruptions due to childbearing and choice of jobs. Women often chose jobs that were less risky and provided more prestige in the community and as a result paid less. Non-profits and teachers come to mind. Men took jobs that were often dirty and dangerous, and more got killed on the job.

Carrie Lukas of the Independent Women's Forum explores further:
Another group should join in the fun: men who work part-time. The same Department of Labor statistics that show the wage gap among full-time workers reveals a gap among those who work part-time. But this time it’s the men who are the victims. The median male part-time worker makes about 90 percent of the earnings of the median part-time woman. Their “Equal Pay Day” would fall in mid-February, not April, but the concept is the same.
Of course this points out that there's more to supposed wage gaps than meets the eye. (Read her piece for the explanation of the part-time disparity.)

Steve Chapman, Tribune, on the subject:
June O'Neill, an economist at Baruch College and former director of the Congressional Budget Office, has uncovered something that debunks the discrimination thesis. Take out the effects of marriage and child-rearing, and the difference between the genders suddenly vanishes. "For men and women who never marry and never have children, there is no earnings gap," she said in an interview.
Lukas in the Washington Post:
Surveys have shown for years that women tend to place a higher priority on flexibility and personal fulfillment than do men, who focus more on pay. Women tend to avoid jobs that require travel or relocation, and they take more time off and spend fewer hours in the office than men do. Men disproportionately take on the dirtiest, most dangerous and depressing jobs.

When these kinds of differences are taken into account and the comparison is truly between men and women in equivalent roles, the wage gap shrinks. In his book "Why Men Earn More," Warren Farrell -- a former board member of the National Organization for Women in New York -- identifies more than three dozen professions in which women out-earn men (including engineering management, aerospace engineering, radiation therapy and speech-language pathology). Farrell seeks to empower women with this information. Discrimination certainly plays a role in some workplaces, but individual preferences are the real root of the wage gap.

When women realize that it isn't systemic bias but the choices they make that determine their earnings, they can make better-informed decisions.
(Link to the book.) And that means voting in a more-informed manner as well. So let's stop the mythology, stop the victimology, keep the flexibility. Part of being an adult is making responsible choices and being responsible for your actions. Children are a responsibility and a priceless blessing.

Durbin Knee-Deep

Sen. Dick Durbin and Sen. Hillary Clinton have yet to return major contributions from a company and its CEO charged with multiple counts of sexual harassment as well as the subject of a fraud investigation and a RICO lawsuit. Reverse Spin:
Politicians across the country have been running for the hills to return campaign contributions from the suburban Chicago business consulting company International Profit Associates and its founder John Burgess. Except, apparently, Hillary Clinton. And Dick Durbin, who is knee-deep in IPA-related money and has its lawyer (pictured above) on his finance committee for a big Chicago fundraiser on Friday.
Even Governor Blagojevich has returned this guy's money, as has Sen. Barack Obama. And yes, there's a Rezko connection through the company's lawyer, also a top Dem donor.

Losing the Future

Tony Blankley on the alarming attitudes of the Muslim world (and these are countries we consider moderate) and the implications of the constant demagoguery against the war on terror:
Winston Churchill warned when he took over government in 1940: "If we open a quarrel between the past and the present, we shall find that we have lost the future."

And, as an official alarmist, let me assert that the data, such as above, suggest that our future is quite losable if we persist in ignoring the regrettable realities pregnant within it.
Fred Thompson on the Democrats. Via the RCP Blog.

Everyday Inspiration


I've never been much of a cook, learning to out of self-preservation, I've always like to bake but man does not live on sweets alone. My husband is a great cook so fortunately for our kids' palates and mine, they have him to look forward to on the weekends.

Lately though, I've started watching the Food Network while folding clothes or cleaning up the basement. The Sun Times has a great rundown today of TV chefs, which I mostly agree with, especially panning "Semi-Homemade Cooking". You'd think that show would appeal to me given that's how I cook, but it looks like cardboard is on the menu--color coordinated with the table arrangements and the hostess outfit.

Yeah, I like The Barefoot Contessa the best, despite the name she looks and sounds comfortable and is in my age bracket. I try to exercise watching that one, though.

As I say, I live an exciting life.

Everyday inspiration.

From Lawn Chairs to the Nanny Village




(Latest Red Skirt, Blue Skirt response.
In related news, BoomerGirl.com is up for an EPpy award.)
I think that I shall never see

A poem lovely as a tree
Two lines. They were written by poet Joyce Kilmer in 1913 and I memorized the poem as a class assignment by my third grade teacher, Mrs. Penzkover. Fortunately most of the class was ahead of me by the time it was my turn to recite. But who knows if I would have remembered more than that first line over 40 years later if I hadn't had to memorize it, just have read it.

In 1913 Wilmette had grown from prairie, farmland, or swamp. There were a few trees to go with the few homes.

This week the village passed an ordinance mandating a tree canopy of 35%. It runs 8 pages. What's Wilmette's current tree canopy, painstakingly quantified by UIC students? Almost 50%, the laissez faire level, up from zero when Wilmette was founded.

The truth is, homeowners like trees.

What's the greatest threat to Wilmette trees? Dutch Elm and now Emerald Ash Borer disease. And the Village of Wilmette.

So this ordinance is purely symbolic. But if the village insists on passing symbolic ordinances, please, brevity is preferred. Especially if this ordinance is to serve as a model for other communities.

Rather than 8 pages of bureaucratese, (if memory serves), Trustee Swanson said it nicely at the board meeting on Tuesday...
Plant a tree in the front yard.

Plant a tree in the back yard.
Two sentences. That's poetry for you.

I learned my first lesson in suburban politics the first winter we lived here. A major snowstorm paralyzed the city of Chicago and my suburb as well. At the time I lived one suburb south, in Evanston, right next to the City.

People started digging their cars out. The snow had covered most of them. As I dumped snow on the sidewalk (where else?), I noted neighbors who had finished digging bringing out big plastic garbage cans, bar stools, lawn chairs… Then they would string something around them to mark off their newly liberated parking space. The bar stools had a certain cachet, but over the next few days I observed they were most likely to be stolen. The lawn chairs emerged as the superior choice. After all, you could comfortably lounge on sentry duty, or chat with similarly occupied people, kind of a mobile front porch. Or you could twist the lawn chairs until they made a kind of fence---you could even call it street art, and who could disagree? The most secure arrangement was to loop bike locks through them, perhaps casually looped around a nearby streetlight or post. In Chicago a little bit of effort entitled one to convert public property to personal use. Our politicians of all stripes have taken this to heart. Thus we see corruption both grand and petty, and public offices bequeathed to children.

But I was shocked to hear air-raid sirens go off one night. What now!? My new husband, having been in town a few months longer, reassured me that since our suburb had declared itself a “nuclear free zone” this was the suburb’s way of reminding people to move their cars so the plows could come through. This struck me as both alarmist and trivial, but I suppose it is one way to alert people who otherwise have no expectation that the local government will actually plow the streets in a timely manner. But as my spouse also pointed out, if the nukes come, people in Evanston will be out moving their cars. The second lesson I learned that there is absolutely no limit to the amount of symbolic gestures my fellow citizens will make.

We moved one suburb north. Wilmette had cobbled streets, old houses, and lots of trees. It had an image of “little old lady in tennis shoes” conservatism. That reputation is way out of date. Oh, there are the left-over libertarians, the social conservatives here and there. But they have been taught to mind their own business and keep out of local affairs. While the taxes are too high, the level of services is high--- decent schools, the village plows the sidewalks and picks up leaves from the curb—no need to bag them. These folks send their checks to Club for Growth but are a non-factor except for the occasional property tax rebellion.

The most common kind of conservative is the “good government” conservative. This successful business executive will run for office promising to bring business methods to the local government bodies and make them more efficient. The trouble is they do treat government like a business---a growth industry. The school superintendents, the village managers and the park district directors soon capture them. These business folk raise taxes because they are fiscal conservatives. They defend buying houses for the village manager or arranging a $200k pension (paid by the state, not the local taxpayers) for a beloved school superintendent. They are the political living dead. Watching a meeting you may think it’s that deer-in-the-headlights look, but it comes back at you---their dead conservative souls stream out of their lifeless eyes as they go along with raising taxes to extend school children’s P.E. by two minutes, or giving a $25 subsidy to village residents who buy a Prius. They play along because they have succeeded in business by being team players. So they block and tackle for the wrong team.

The team is being quarterbacked by another set of good government types. These folks, having labored on the Appearance Review Commission or the Fine Arts Commission, believe they have earned lawn chairs. These lawn chairs are used to mark other people’s private property and convert it to “public use.” This public use turns out to be a currently favored cause- but mostly a symbolic one.

An old convent came up for sale in an old part of town, residential on one side, commercial on the other. The retired nuns sold the land to a developer of single family homes. But everyone had an opinion on the sale of church land. No separation of church and state here. One faction wanted open space for a park. There were some wonderful old trees on the property and for sure they needed to be saved. Another group wanted part of the land for soccer fields, yet another for senior housing. And there was a group who wanted to preserve the historic building, presumably not preserving the nuns within as well. They all signed a petition to put the purchase of the land on the ballot for a negligible $25 million. The referendum passed. Candidates for village trustee who supported the referendum triumphed at the polls. Alas, the construction of affordable housing necessitated cutting down many of the trees that had just been saved from private developers. One newly-elected village trustee said they weren’t supposed to cut all the trees down at once. Perhaps in penance, the newly elected trustees passed an ordinance requiring homeowners to get a license to cut down any tree and pay a fine if the tree exceeds a certain circumference. The dozen senior “affordable” units will sell for $199,000 (the other 69 units are priced from $400,000 to $2 million.)---not really affordable outside of Manhattan or South Beach, but a symbol of triumph for our caring liberal friends.

The causes multiply. Handguns are banned. Smoking is banned. Hybrid cars are subsidized. The village is now considering how to enforce the Kyoto treaty.

I started blogging a year ago, having outworn my welcome among some in the village. Andrew Klavan, City Journal, chronicles his experience in "The Big White Lie":

The thing I like best about being a conservative is that I don’t have to lie. I don’t have to pretend that men and women are the same. I don’t have to declare that failed or oppressive cultures are as good as mine. I don’t have to say that everyone’s special or that the rich cause poverty or that all religions are a path to God. I don’t have to claim that a bad writer like Alice Walker is a good one or that a good writer like Toni Morrison is a great one. I don’t have to pretend that Islam means peace.

Of course, like everything, this candor has its price. A politics that depends on honesty will be, by nature, often impolite.
By blogging I only alienate people indirectly or by accident as they browse, so liberals around here can maintain their polite fictions, at least among themselves.

When the snows melted, my neighbors took their lawn chairs and restored the public street. The lawn chairs of our village government will long outlast the melting snow.

We have a couple of newly elected board members, two incumbents off in a few weeks. And I keep blogging.

Sad Story

A sad and scary story we are grappling with around here:
McCormack, seven months sober, wants to warn other teens about the hazards of using alcohol and drugs. But he also wants parents to know how easy it is for teens to pop painkillers before a class or find a weekend keg party at a home where parents are out of town.

"They always blame it on whoever is having a party," McCormack said. "It's nobody's fault but the kids'. It just takes courage. You've got to be brave and not do it."

Step Forward, Liberals

A comprehensive piece on the PBS censorship of a film, "Islam vs. Islamists" on the intimidation of moderate Muslims by radical practitioners of the faith. Previous post, The Disgrace that is PBS. At RedState. One excerpt of particular interest to Chicagoans:

An important point I want to make here is that in the Burke film, Saudi Arabia and their Wahhabi sect within Islam do not fare well for their influences and their monies poured in to the US over the years to American Muslim groups to help fund, among other things, the construction of many many mosques around the country.

As the film would tell you (were you allowed to see it), one of the first communities targeted by the Saudis was Chicago, and the Nation of Islam; the so-called "Black Muslims." It is theorized that this "investment" in American Muslims was inspired in part by "an almost forgotten event in Saudi Arabia back in November 1979, when heavily armed Wahhabi extremists stormed the Grand Mosque in Mecca seizing the holiest place in all of Islam."

These extremists proclaimed the Royal Family was too "corrupt, decadent, and Westernized" and they were dislodged ONLY when French commandos were called in, ending a 2 week bloody siege. The event terrified the ruling classes, and "their solution was in effect to buy their way out of further problems by pouring billions of dollars into whatever the fundamentalists...the Wahhabis...wished to do as long as these activities occurred outside of Saudi Arabia." This, it is asserted, was the beginning of a building boom of Saudi Mosques across America.

Op-ed in the Washington Times by Frank Gaffney, a producer of the film, which is still being suppressed. Gaffney notes:

It is bad enough that the public airwaves were used to disseminate only one rendering of the state of Islam in the West -- and a highly misleading one, at that. The process whereby the voices of anti-Islamist Muslims were silenced by PBS and WETA was also characterized by egregious behavior, some of which would typically evoke howls of outrage from American liberals.

These included: attempts to blacklist producers on political grounds; outlandish conflicts of interest (notably, Mr. MacNeil's self-dealing and his film's featuring of two Islamist-sympathizing Muslim "advisers" recruited by WETA to help determine which documentaries were aired); and one of those advisers' unauthorized preview of a "rough-cut" version for representatives the Nation of Islam, a subject of the film -- in clear violation of the most basic tenets of journalistic ethics.

The question occurs: Where are the liberal non-Muslims in the controversy over "Islam vs. Islamists"? They have at least as much on the line as the rest of us in the outcome of this struggle for the soul and future character of Islam.

After all, the anti-Islamist Muslims and conservatives are not the only ones in the Islamofascists' cross hairs. Homosexuals, women and Jews are among those whose lives will be made miserable, or simply be prematurely terminated, in the new world order the Islamists have in mind. Blacks are still being sold into slavery in Islamist nations. And, to date, the Islamists have been responsible for killing more of their fellow Muslims than any other population, not just in Darfur but around the world.
Is there anything left of the classical liberal ideals in the Western liberalism of today? Now would be the time to step forward, liberals.

The Young and Restless

Apparently there are lots of the French who have taken refuge in Britain, their old foe, presumably because France is falling apart. And the Poles are emigrating to England and Ireland as well, despite the booming Polish economy. Anne Applebaum, WaPo:
All of this is, of course, precisely what previous generations of European politicians have feared. For the past decade, French, German and other European leaders have tried to unify European tax laws and regulations, the better to "even out the playing field" -- or (depending on your point of view) to make life equally difficult everywhere. The emigration patterns of the past decade -- and the past five years in particular -- prove that that effort has failed. Sarkozy's election campaign, if successful, might put the final nail in the coffin.
The young and those restless for opportunity have voted with their feet. Are there enough of them left in France to elect Sarkozy? Who knows, but the playing field will eventually be leveled one way or another.

More pungent commentary on the upcoming election at No Paseran here, here, here.

New Horizons


Storms and clouds on Jupiter. Pix from NASA's New Horizons probe. Storm Spectra.

Nonie Darwish on Al Arabiya

Egyptian-American Nonie Darwish, author of Now They Call Me Infidel in an interview on Al-Arabiya "We must begin to view the Jews in a forgiving light". Excerpts and clip at MEMRI.

And in other news, a top Hamas official gives us a piece of his mind:
Sheik Ahmad Bahr, acting Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, declared during a Friday sermon at a Sudan mosque that America and Israel will be annihilated and called upon Allah to kill Jews and Americans "to the very Last One". Following are excerpts from the sermon that took place last month, courtesy of MEMRI.

Ahmad Bahr began: "You will be victorious" on the face of this planet. You are the masters of the world on the face of this planet. Yes, [the Koran says that] "you will be victorious," but only "if you are believers." Allah willing, "you will be victorious," while America and Israel will be annihilated. I guarantee you that the power of belief and faith is greater than the power of America and Israel. They are cowards, who are eager for life, while we are eager for death for the sake of Allah. That is why America's nose was rubbed in the mud in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Somalia, and everywhere.

Worshipping death at a place of worship. Forgiveness is scarce.

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

A Spoke in the Spin


The top hurricane forecaster in the US puts a spoke in the "global warming caused by humans" spin. At HotAir. (And what on earth is happening on Mars?)

Previous posts: Stabilizing the PLANET, No More Americone Dream?

Obama Ethics Slip


Another Obama ethics slip. Following upon his meeting with his campaign manager in his Senate office, an Obama Senate staffer uses Senate equipment to send political missives.

(Hat tip Taegan Goddard's Political Wire) Newsweek:
Senate ethics rules allow senators with active campaigns to "split" the work time and salary of official schedulers such as Obama's Molly Buford. According to Obama's campaign spokesman, Robert Gibbs, she in fact is paid by both entities. But Senate rules and federal law forbid the use of official equipment—such as faxes and phone lines—to conduct campaign business, which was what Buford was doing last Thursday when she faxed Obama's political "call list" to the senator's personal aide at a Columbia, S.C., hotel.
And then there's the Rezko run of corruption. Rezko is a close, personal friend of Barack's.

Durbin and Dems Disgrace

Another see-no-evil liberal, albeit a somewhat sympathetic one, suggests singing a Beach Boy tune or two to give peace a chance, with the original lyrics to Barbara Ann, not Sen. McCain's reprise. Recall that the "Bomb Iran" parody took place during the 444 days of the Iran hostage crisis. Iran emerged as the Terror State, a first for the world, a state dedicated to spreading terrorism and led by terrorists then and now, as Iran's President Ahmadinejad was one of the student leaders who stormed the American Embassy in Tehran.

Magically the hostages were released on the day of President Ronald Reagan's inauguration, as America recoiled from the dark, helpless years under Jimmy Carter.

Iran remains a threat, building nukes, sponsoring terror and directly threatening our troops in its bid to destabilize Iraq and become the dominant power in the Middle East.

In the face of these threats, (recall Saddam stockpiled chemicals, which are now being used by Al Qaeda in Iraq) the Democrats try to rewrite history and escape responsibility in the mode of Carter and Clinton, even as they control the levers of power in Congress. Sen.Dick Durbin of Illinois leads the Dems in a disgraceful litany of lies.

Related posts: Fertilizer Bombers, The Trouble With Harry, Heroes and Fools, Durbin the Ditz

UPDATE: Giuliani in Chicago. Tribune:
"In the history of war, I have never heard of a situation in which one nation is required to not only retreat, but give a schedule of its retreat to the enemy," Giuliani said. "I mean, when has an army that has to retreat ever had to give a printed-out list of how it's going to retreat to its enemy? That's not the most prudent thing to do."

Giuliani, whose stewardship of New York City in the aftermath of 9/11 has given him a political platform to discuss terrorism, said he agreed with former CIA Director George Tenet that "we have to presume there's an Al Qaeda presence in the United States."

The Rezko Run

From Jack Higgins, Sun Times
Rezko, Rezko, Rezko. Run Obama run.

Related posts: Illuminating Debate, Obama on the Spot Again

Iran the Great Satan

Iran arrests women and blames it on us. Via Michelle Malkin. Who do you think is the Great Satan in this episode? Anything to say Nancy?

Atlas Shrugs

Another Egyptian blogger has gone silent. Atlas Shrugs:
SANDMONKEY: "Any kind of democratic reform in the country [Egypt] for the past 3 years has been rolled back specifically because there is no more pressure coming from Washington anymore."

ATLAS: Why? What happened to the pressure in Washington?

SANDMONKEY: You know what happened to the pressure in Washington. The Democrats won the Congress. There is no more pressure coming from Bush because he is not able to push people anymore to do those things. He is not able to push the Egyptian government anymore because the American public is suddenly not interested in reforming the Middle East because of what's going on in the Iraq. So suddenly the Egyptian government is not afraid of the American pressure. They are doing whatever they want to do. They are beating up demonstrators, they are cracking down on activists, they are changing the constitution, and eroding civil liberties once and for all and they are using proxies to take down bloggers.
Read on if you can stand it. Nancy Pelosi has a lot to answer for.

Fertilizer Bombers

Anhydrous ammonia. The fertilizer bomb plot revealed. Connecting the dots in the UK, touching on 9/11 as well. Via LGF. Watch it all, especially the concluding remarks. Doing jihad together in a big way.