Friday, March 10, 2006

The New and Bigger Public Pie

Aldermen in Chicago have made noises about taking over Catholic church property for historic preservation purposes, which is probably a trial balloon for taking them over entirely on some other pretext. And high-density housing development advocates and other special interest groups around Chicago have targeted church property as well. Now we have baldly grasping attempts by local government to displace a Filipino Baptist Fellowship building in Long Beach, CA.

Via Castle Coalition, the Baptist Press News:
The congregation has adequate legal grounds to argue the case, Eastman, a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, said.

“This is a church, and the Supreme Court’s decision ... didn’t involve a church,” he said. “I think the fact that it’s a church means we’re going to have to force the court to [re-examine] whether you can just take people’s private property for economic development when you’ve got an institution that doesn’t have an economic base -- it has a spiritual base for its contribution to the community.”

Part of the problem, Eastman said on Fox, is that the government has lost its way regarding its purpose.

It’s supposed to protect our inalienable rights to things like our own property. They think their job is to collect as much tax revenue as they can to make things prettier in other parts of the city,” he said.
The targets of eminent domain are more often poorer and less connected constituents, as municipal officials bow to the demands of their well-connected friends and special interest groups, looking for a favored piece of the new and bigger public pie---made out of your property.

No comments: