It is a national disgrace that children, most often poor and minority, are trapped in failing and dangerous schools. The latest Tribune story here. Sun Times here. This has been going on for at least a generation.
This is the civil rights movement of our time.
And who is standing in the schoolhouse door, keeping children from crossing the threshold of learning? Who is holding the children back, keeping them from developing their full potential, and denying them the special, individual attention they need?
Who indeed. The teachers' unions.
These are unions who run the schools not for the benefit of the children, but for their own benefit. These are unions who not only treat all children the same in the one-size-fits-all schools, but treat all their teachers the same, rewarding age and mediocrity and discouraging excellence.
You may not like the No Child Left Behind law, which mandates national testing, taking some prerogatives away from local schools, but it has enabled some students to move out of failing and dangerous schools, if states care enough to support the law. And you may not like President Bush, but he has consistently spoken of the "soft bigotry of low expectations" and honestly tried to raise learning standards and performance.
In his last State of the Union address, the president stressed the importance of training more teachers in math and science, so that our children can compete in the global marketplace. An emphasis on reading, math and science fundamentals, especially in the early grades, can do more for the ultimate success of our children than any investment in laptops. They are the building blocks of lifelong learning. We need to remember that facts and substance are more important than process---give a child a fish, they will be nourished for a day, but teach them how to fish, they will be able to provide their own nourishment for a lifetime. (Read Thomas Sowell here, via RCP)
Senator Barack Obama, to his credit, has raised the subject of merit pay, which will be necessary to recruit more math-oriented teachers. I say pay on the merits and teachers will come--especially male teachers who are needed for the subjects they teach, as male role models, and to reverse the overly-feminized culture of our public schools. (Read Clarence Page here, via RCP) Sun Times:
Obama prodded Democrats on education. "I do not believe that being against No Child Left Behind is an education policy," he said. "We should take a look at pay for performance," an idea not generally popular with teacher unions.Sen. Obama might be one of the few Democrat politicians who has enough star power to take on the teachers' unions successfully, as they are a core Democrat constituency, but does he have the guts to follow through? Sen. Lieberman tried it some years ago, before he had to cave to Al Gore's Presidential platform when he was his running mate. Now he is practically a pariah in his own party, for that and other issues.
Now a Republican presidential contender, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, is taking on the teachers' unions.