And then there's this, which seems to me to open up people's historic homes to takeover. You tell me.
Senate Floor Amendment No. 2Here's the Daily Herald's description of the pros and cons of the bill. And here's their editorial, via state Sen. Susan Garrett's site.
Further amends the Statute on Statutes in relation to the exercise of eminent domain for private development purposes. Excludes from the term "private development": (1) development for which the exercise of eminent domain is authorized under the Telephone Company Act; and (2) development of property that is a historic resource, local landmark, or contributing structure within a local landmark district, if the proposed development requires that the character of the property be preserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment