Once again, the NY Times exists in their own world. Michael Luo watched a different debate than I did. There was nothing particularly heated about Mitt Romney asking Mike Huckabee whether it was true that he, net net raised taxes $500 million as Arkansas governor. Huckabee evaded the question three times, looking more weak each time.
Must the NY Times use words like these "angry", "struck back with a vengeance", "aggressively", and "orthodoxy", "chastised", "rancorous" in describing Republicans? Sadly, yes. Apparently the Times is easily angered.
Here's my take of this debate and Saturday's, here and here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment