Are we there yet?
When I was a kid, back in the last half century, we piled in the back of the family station wagon and headed off, usually with a tent. We went East, to visit relatives, and to the NY World's Fair, where we got a glimpse of telephones you didn't have to share on a party line, technology that would take us to the moon. We traveled South, shared a prayer circle with the Cherokee, and walked back in history at
It was a time when most people drove rather than flew. It was a time of no air-conditioning but cheap gas. It was a time when you only got fresh vegetables in season, when you shopped at the corner store and shopped in town and what they had was what you got. If you didn't like ruffles and blue, too bad. That was the only dress that fit. And living in a small town, we had cable, yes, but only so we could get two TV channels rather than one. I grew up without ABC:)
I don't think I was deprived as a child. But I certainly wouldn't want to go back to all of that limited choice and seasonal scarcity. I certainly will still want the choices at the mall or on the net--not necessarily in the neighborhood, and not necessarily made in the
We are competing globally now, we have global choices--and so does much of the rest of the world. Populous
Obama wants to slow, McCain wants to grow.
Whose policies will mean jobs?
The economy runs on energy. We have had a moratorium on drilling offshore for almost 20 years. We haven't built a new refinery for nearly 30. While
In an age where everyone appreciates the enormous technological advances driven by computers, why are we ignoring the tremendous progress made in drilling and transporting oil? Did anyone notice that even the powerful, destructive force of Katrina did not spill any oil in the Gulf? Are you aware that ANWR in
High energy costs are a huge tax on working people.
Then there are the high food prices, driven up by Democrat policies that mandate corn be grown for fuel not food. Does this make sense, when almost as much energy goes to grow corn as is supposedly saved by using it as ethanol? Why are we sacrificing now based on the unproven threat of global warming, which even if it exists, even if we did everything Al wants, would barely budge the thermometer? And how does it help the planet to drill in less advanced and responsible countries? Some perspective please.
In the short term we are stuck with oil and gas. We need to drill now. Democrats somehow think it's pie in the sky to talk about drilling for oil when it can't happen immediately, yet they want to take immediate steps to protect against global warming that may never happen. Democrats have been saying this for years--but if we'd started drilling years ago we wouldn't be in trouble now. We can start drilling from existing platforms off
Conservation yes, but it's not enough. Alternatives yes, but even maxing out and peppering pristine stretches of the west with windmills will only amount to 20% of what we need. Unless we want our economy and our future to shrink, long term we must have nuclear. Any plan that doesn't include nuclear is wishful thinking, irresponsible, and risky to the well-being of our families and the security of our country.
We need to drill here, drill now—we’ve got to start somewhere.
--crossposted at BlogHer
No comments:
Post a Comment